This is why the FBI is pointless

The point is that almost no one refuses to talk to Federal agents.
Your concept is inane

Almost no one!!

So you're not sure. :good4u:

Let me help.

Do I have to talk to the FBI?
No. The FBI does not have the authority to make anyone answer questions (other than name and address [see errata]), to permit a search without a warrant, or to otherwise cooperate with an investigation. Agents are usually lawyers, and they are always trained as investigators; they have learned the power of persuasion, the ability to make a person feel scared, guilty, or impolite for refusing their requests for information. So remember, they have no legal authority to force people to do anything -- unless they have obtained an arrest or search warrant. Even when agents do have warrants, you still don't have to answer their question.
 
I get it just fine.
She is a hundred times more successful than you, and you are not worthy of judging her, you sick fuck.

Is this Dr. Ford, before she became a Dr.??

NSFW
42449899_2368082916541482_2540287840630079488_n.jpg
 
The assholes who refuse to speak to the FBI will be telling us a lot.

The FBI does not just ask for a statement. They actually ask questions...so they can evaluate any statements that have been made.
 
The assholes who refuse to speak to the FBI will be telling us a lot.

The FBI does not just ask for a statement. They actually ask questions...so they can evaluate any statements that have been made.
I'm sure they
will have lots*and lots to ask Mrs. Ford....and much to look into....
 
The assholes who refuse to speak to the FBI will be telling us a lot.

The FBI does not just ask for a statement. They actually ask questions...so they can evaluate any statements that have been made.

People that refuse to speak can ‘say’ many things, Frank.

Like ‘screw this, I don’t want the media hounding me’. Or ‘if for some reason this thing makes it to court I may be called as a witness...screw that’.

See what I mean?
 
I'm sure they
will have lots*and lots to ask Mrs. Ford....and much to look into....

It’s entirely plausible she isn’t the most stable individual.

But if it’s going to be investigated they should investigate ALL OF IT. Can they retrieve her social media? If so, they should because for instance if she’s a hardcore abortion activist that could be a potential motive to make ‘embellishments’ in her account. We’ve heard from plenty of Kavanaugh’s friends. Maybe they should interview Ford’s.

The one thing they could do forensics on is the letter that started this whole thing. They should have a look to see if it was edited in any way. If so, by whom and why.

Problem is they only have a week and since it’s a political stunt [no doubt they’re quite aware of it] I suspect they’ll just talk to people and give democrats more time to come up with something else.

Wait for it.
 
The assholes who refuse to speak to the FBI will be telling us a lot.

The FBI does not just ask for a statement. They actually ask questions...so they can evaluate any statements that have been made.

If you refuse to speak, you're not "telling" anything :rolleyes:
 
Even if he survives this brief investigation into his jurassic past and gets appointed, some people
know and will come forth even after. This guys rep is toast. Not sure about the rape line legend, but if
that indeed happened and more than once, at some point loose lips will sink ships, someone
will know whose house, a date, his presence in such a line....
 
Even if he survives this brief investigation into his jurassic past and gets appointed, some people
know and will come forth even after. This guys rep is toast. Not sure about the rape line legend, but if
that indeed happened and more than once, at some point loose lips will sink ships, someone
will know whose house, a date, his presence in such a line....
Where are they? He's been in the courts for a long time.....
 
You realize the FBI falls under the executive branch, right?
Doesn’t that mean Trump can direct them to look in places Congress was reluctant to lol?

Of course. That wasn't my statement, was it? My statement was "depends on how hamstrung they are by Toadstool" (as they do their investigation). Will Toadstool direct them not to interview witnesses pertaining to K.'s alcoholic binges... including Judge's since they were joined at the hip back then? Will they be instructed to look only at the backgrounds of the accusers, or will they be given more latitude to look at *all* the parties' histories, including his denials of heavy drinking?
 
Of course. That wasn't my statement, was it? My statement was "depends on how hamstrung they are by Toadstool" (as they do their investigation). Will Toadstool direct them not to interview witnesses pertaining to K.'s alcoholic binges... including Judge's since they were joined at the hip back then? Will they be instructed to look only at the backgrounds of the accusers, or will they be given more latitude to look at *all* the parties' histories, including his denials of heavy drinking?

My understanding is that your president has given them free reign lol.

Kavanaugh has already gotten the rectal exam from congress. Don’t be surprised if Trump directs them elsewhere. And keep in mind you goof balls wanted this.
 
My understanding is that your president has given them free reign lol.

Kavanaugh has already gotten the rectal exam from congress. Don’t be surprised if Trump directs them elsewhere. And keep in mind you goof balls wanted this.
what are they bitching about now???
 
People that refuse to speak can ‘say’ many things, Frank.

Like ‘screw this, I don’t want the media hounding me’. Or ‘if for some reason this thing makes it to court I may be called as a witness...screw that’.

See what I mean?

Yeah. You "mean" that inferring that they want to hide something is not one of the things you want to consider.

Okay. I get that.
 
Back
Top