This should be a law

[Flash]

I haven't seen any. But if it's just on a message board, probably not a common thing. Though it does say something about the failure of conservative economics that this happens.

Here is just one example. There are many more:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...elfare-From-New-York-quot&highlight=subsidize

 

[archives]

GDP by state [Bureau of Economic Analysis).

GDP by State:

1. CA
2. TX*
3. NY
4. FL*
5. IL
6. PA*
7. OH*
8. NJ
9. GA*
10. NC*

6 of the top 10 are red states.

But those four Blue States add up to nearly thirty percent of the total US GDP, the six Red States less than a quarter, and seven out of the next ten are Blue States

 

[TTQ64]

There is an interesting phenomena among leftists that I think should be addressed

Step 1: They vote for policies and politicians that make leftist States unlivable

Step 2: Once it becomes unbearable, they leave for conservative states with low taxes and low regulation to escape the bullshit they voted for

Step 3: They begin to vote for the same policies that led them to leave their left wing totalitarian State

With that in mind, red states should pass laws that prohibit people moving from Blue states from voting in state and local elections for a period of 10 years after they move. They will be able to vote in national elections for President, Senate and House. But nothing local.

We have to stop these diseased leftists from spreading their poisonous ideology

I agree....and we should also let red states fend for themselves by letting my state, CA and other progressive states, give just enough to keep the toilets running in the white house.

Anything more your state will need will have to come from the revenue of your low taxes and deregulation.

And for the record...…...no one is moving to bumfuckkentucky!

 

[Bill]

the problem is freedom of ignorance

Judge not yee, lest yee be judged....

You &*&%$ Novo semi-constitutionalist...

 

[StoneByStone]

Not really. It has to do with Southern states being primarily agricultural historically which were poorer than the northern industrial states (until they moved South).

But it's not just the Southern states.

 

[archives]

I understand. But the red states are not responsible for money being redistributed to them by the federal government and are most often the ones seeking to cut back on some of those programs (although the current budget increased non-defense discretionary spending by 11%). Also, there may be more red states that fit into that category, but they are all small states and the richer blue states have a lot more people collecting a lot more of that money.

A lot of it is not distributed because of lower income in red states but because of increased migration to those states by retiring seniors and collecting their Social Security and Medicare, Medicaid and VA benefits.

Social Security, Medicare, and VA benefits aren't included in the money going to State Governments, and the inequality is based upon what each State pays to the Federal Gov't compared to what they receive in return

 

[Into the Night]

They will have to show proof of voting for conservatives. Not Trans Righty assholes

Hmmmm. Sounds like a political test to vote. That can't be done at the federal level of course, but for a State, that could be possible if the State's constitution sets it up that way. It's similar to religious tests to hold offices that States can and have done.

I could actually see this kind of thing being possible. A State doing it would get roasted by the Democrats, but who cares?

 

[Into the Night]

Source?

History, dude. History. Something you are always denying and trying to change.

 

[Into the Night]

Let freedom of thought reign..

You know Somalia could really use a great leader like you, you are wasting your talents here.....

Freedom of thought does reign. Just not the right to vote for 10 years if you like to vote liberal.

 

[StoneByStone]

History, dude. History. Something you are always denying and trying to change.

Can you give me some examples?

 

[Into the Night]

"unbearable?"

The actual numbers aren't that great, and even of that a good number are snowbirds, who return home every April. And if it wasn't for that "leftist ideology" the United States would look like Kansas, dwindling away in mediocrity

Kansas is not dwindling away. Neither is anywhere else.

 

[Into the Night]

I've never heard anyone complain about that.

Source?

History, dude. History. Something you like to deny and try to change.

 

[Into the Night]

Inversion fallacy. Third Monkey to the Left fallacy. Conundrum of the Falling Man fallacy. Paradox from 4th Dimension Fallacy. You wouldn't know logic if it were sodomizing you.

Teflon Don was right: you're both complete simpletons who've never held a job.

Bulverism fallacy.

 

[Bill]

Freedom of thought does reign. Just not the right to vote for 10 years if you like to vote liberal.

One party state like cuba & china..... Now you ppl are showing your true colors....

 

[Into the Night]

Fuck The Red States That Voted For Trump!


Fuck Pennsylvania. Fuck Ohio. Fuck Florida. Fuck Michigan. Fuck Wisconsin. And fuck Iowa. and the south

All flyover fucking redneck idiots who have contributed to the destruction of America.

Nobody in the important states give two shits about them.

California, Illinois and New York. The states that contribute the most to this country in terms of GDP, education, agriculture, income, industry, and every other indicator that matters.

Red states contribute nothing. Red states produce nothing. They only take, take, and take.

The United States is more than just three States. California has effectively left the Union. They no longer honor the Constitution of the United States nor their own state constitution.

GDP doesn't matter. Education doesn't matter. California does not have a stable agriculture. Income doesn't matter. California is losing industry. None of these are indicators.
Every State produces something. Every State contributes something. You are just being a bigot.

 

[StoneByStone]

Freedom of thought does reign. Just not the right to vote for 10 years if you like to vote liberal.

So only people with certain politics should be allowed to vote?

Why even have democracy then?

 

[Into the Night]

I haven't seen any. But if it's just on a message board, probably not a common thing. Though it does say something about the failure of conservative economics that this happens.

You must nullified everything you posted.

 

[Into the Night]

I agree....and we should also let red states fend for themselves by letting my state, CA and other progressive states, give just enough to keep the toilets running in the white house.

Anything more your state will need will have to come from the revenue of your low taxes and deregulation.

And for the record...…...no one is moving to bumfuckkentucky!

Did you know Kentucky has a population of 4.6 million? Oh, and the Kentucky Derby is held there every year too. Rather popular horse race, you know.

 

[Bill]

So only people with certain politics should be allowed to vote?

Why even have democracy then?

Maybe there will conpromise & give ppl that don't vote as they wish a 3/5ths vote like "they" did before....

 

[Into the Night]

Judge not yee, lest yee be judged....

You &*&%$ Novo semi-constitutionalist...

Since conservatives have already been judged by liberals as worthless piece of shits anyway, it's only just that conservatives consider liberals ineligible to vote for 10 years. The liberals have judged. Now they are being judged as they have judged.