Thomas Massie Obliterates Trump Lynching.

Soros employee Alvin Bragg has been called before congress as part of the ongoing investigation into the weaponization of government, particularly the legal system by the Biden Regime and the democrat party.

Massie questions FEC Commissioner Trey Trainor to examine just what the lynching in New York was based on, and in doing so obliterates the farce that was used against the political opponent of Joe Biden. No one intelligent or honest can watch this and still claim there is anything valid about the NY Case.


That's some idiocy.

The only thing Massie obliterates is any reasonable person thinking Massie is intelligent.
Paying a lawyer for work done on his divorce is not what Trump did.
Buying a house is not what Trump did.
Relatives, particularly spouses, are treated differently under campaign finance law. A campaign can only pay them if they provide a valid service.
Trainor can not legally give advice on NY law. He is not a lawyer in NY. He has not studied the NY statutes. He may be violating his legal ethics by giving legal advice under oath he is not legally authorized to give.
Massie then gets the FEC commissioner to admit they would thoroughly investigate any complaint of payment to hide up an affair to hide an election.
This has to be one of the stupidest committee hearings I have ever heard. It contains no facts but only opinion that is not based on facts.
 
List the other three... Bragg couldn't do it... So, maybe you can...
Oh for fuck's sake. You have been told this repeatedly. Do you have dementia?
Bragg listed them in a court filing before the trial. Trump's lawyers responded to the filing by Bragg before the trial. The judge ruled on them before the trial. Prosecutors listed them in their opening statement. Prosecutors listed them in their closing statements. The judge ruled on what would be in the jury instructions. Trump's lawyers filed a motion about what could be included in the jury instructions. Finally the judge included them in the jury instructions.

To claim Bragg couldn't list the possible other crimes is the height of sticking your head in the sand. Are you really this stupid? It seems you are.

Read page 12. This is the judge's ruling on Feb 15, before the trial.
It lists the 4 other crimes that Bragg says are possible to elevate the charged crime to a felony. The judge rules on them, that 3 of them were presented to the grand jury.
The Court has considered the respective arguments of the parties and finds that the
evidence presented to the grandjury for the first three theories was legally sufficient to support
the intent to commit the "other crime" element of falsifying Business Records in the First Degree.


Can you now dispense with your idiotic claim that Bragg didn't list the crimes?
He listed them on multiple occassions in court and in court filings and presented them to 2 different juries, the grand jury and the trial jury.
 
That's some idiocy.

The only thing Massie obliterates is any reasonable person thinking Massie is intelligent.

Got it, so FEC Commissioner Trey Trainor stating under oath that no crime was committed and that Bragg acted outside of the law to trump up charges against a political opponent gets the usual "NUHN UHN" from you.

Paying a lawyer for work done on his divorce is not what Trump did.

No, Trump paid a lawyer to craft and execute an NDA - which 2/3rds of those in Congress have done on multiple occasions.

Buying a house is not what Trump did.

True.

What Trump did was pose a credible threat to the power of the democrat party - which is the only reason he was lynched.

Relatives, particularly spouses, are treated differently under campaign finance law. A campaign can only pay them if they provide a valid service.

Trainor is the Commissioner of the FEC, who have sole authority over campaign finance. The Soros team shit all over the law, particularly the Supremacy Clause to put this sham lynching together as a means of corrupting the federal presidential election.

Trainor can not legally give advice on NY law. He is not a lawyer in NY. He has not studied the NY statutes. He may be violating his legal ethics by giving legal advice under oath he is not legally authorized to give.

We all know that under the Biden terror regime, anyone who exposes the plans and plots of the party is subject to arrest and imprisonment. It takes great courage to speak against tyrants like Pol Pot, Mao, and Joe Biden.

Massie then gets the FEC commissioner to admit they would thoroughly investigate any complaint of payment to hide up an affair to hide an election.
This has to be one of the stupidest committee hearings I have ever heard. It contains no facts but only opinion that is not based on facts.

Your party was utterly and completely exposed. No one intelligent or honest can watch this and still claim there is anything valid about the NY Case.

Yes, you will say anything to promote absolute power by your party - but the damage this does to your lynching is extreme.
 
Oh for fuck's sake. You have been told this repeatedly. Do you have dementia?
Bragg listed them in a court filing before the trial. Trump's lawyers responded to the filing by Bragg before the trial. The judge ruled on them before the trial. Prosecutors listed them in their opening statement. Prosecutors listed them in their closing statements. The judge ruled on what would be in the jury instructions. Trump's lawyers filed a motion about what could be included in the jury instructions. Finally the judge included them in the jury instructions.

To claim Bragg couldn't list the possible other crimes is the height of sticking your head in the sand. Are you really this stupid? It seems you are.

Read page 12. This is the judge's ruling on Feb 15, before the trial.
It lists the 4 other crimes that Bragg says are possible to elevate the charged crime to a felony. The judge rules on them, that 3 of them were presented to the grand jury.
The Court has considered the respective arguments of the parties and finds that the
evidence presented to the grandjury for the first three theories was legally sufficient to support
the intent to commit the "other crime" element of falsifying Business Records in the First Degree.


Can you now dispense with your idiotic claim that Bragg didn't list the crimes?
He listed them on multiple occassions in court and in court filings and presented them to 2 different juries, the grand jury and the trial jury.

Got is, so enemies of the party are to be convicted for "possible other crimes."

No need for prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, or guilt at all. "Possible" crimes are enough when dealing with enemies of the party.

The rule of law and American Jurisprudence are a thing of the past, this is the Biden Banana Republic.
 
No charges of blasphemy under Sharia? I mean the Soros team is charging federal law - which they have no authority over, why not Sharia law as well?
1st amendment establishment of religion provision excludes government policy aiding or hindering religion.

"Soros team"? Pure BS aimed at producing hate and disinformation.
 
Got it, so FEC Commissioner Trey Trainor stating under oath that no crime was committed and that Bragg acted outside of the law to trump up charges against a political opponent gets the usual "NUHN UHN" from you.



No, Trump paid a lawyer to craft and execute an NDA - which 2/3rds of those in Congress have done on multiple occasions.



True.

What Trump did was pose a credible threat to the power of the democrat party - which is the only reason he was lynched.



Trainor is the Commissioner of the FEC, who have sole authority over campaign finance. The Soros team shit all over the law, particularly the Supremacy Clause to put this sham lynching together as a means of corrupting the federal presidential election.



We all know that under the Biden terror regime, anyone who exposes the plans and plots of the party is subject to arrest and imprisonment. It takes great courage to speak against tyrants like Pol Pot, Mao, and Joe Biden.



Your party was utterly and completely exposed. No one intelligent or honest can watch this and still claim there is anything valid about the NY Case.

Yes, you will say anything to promote absolute power by your party - but the damage this does to your lynching is extreme.
No. It seems the only thing you have got is a non functioning brain.

Trainor is not a NY lawyer and has no training in NY law or understanding of NY statutes. He didn't address the crime that Trump was convicted for.
Trump did not pay Cohen $480,000 to craft an NDA. Only a fool would think that.
Trainor is not THE commissioner of the FEC. There are six commissioners for the FEC. They each have equal votes on what is a violation. Trainor does not get to decide what is a violation of the law. His vote can be easily outvoted.

When is the Biden regime coming after you for speaking out against their terror? It seems the fact that you are still here disproves your idiotic claim.
 
2 out of three are federal and neither Trump nor what's-her-name are NY residents...
No. You clearly don't know what you are talking about.
1. Violation of Federal election law
2. Violation of NY election law
3. Violation of NY tax law.
4. Violation of NY law on falsifying records by multiple other companies, AMI and Cohen entities. (Judge denied this one since not presented to GJ.)
Can you count to 3? 2? 1?
 
No. It seems the only thing you have got is a non functioning brain.

Trainor is not a NY lawyer and has no training in NY law or understanding of NY statutes. He didn't address the crime that Trump was convicted for.

Trump wasn't convicted of a crime. Trump was lynched for posing a credible threat to the power of the democrat party.

Trump did not pay Cohen $480,000 to craft an NDA. Only a fool would think that.

LOL

Anyone who has EVER employed a lawyer knows about expenses.

Cohen paid Stormy $360K to stop her smear campaign. Put it down as a $400K expense and embezzled $60K


Trainor is not THE commissioner of the FEC. There are six commissioners for the FEC. They each have equal votes on what is a violation. Trainor does not get to decide what is a violation of the law. His vote can be easily outvoted.

So the FEC moved against Trump, or declined on lack of evidence?

You try so hard, yet fail so completely.

When is the Biden regime coming after you for speaking out against their terror?

When I become prominent enough to pose a threat to their power.

It seems the fact that you are still here disproves your idiotic claim.

It seem's you're just not very bright.
 
Trump wasn't convicted of a crime. Trump was lynched for posing a credible threat to the power of the democrat party.



LOL

Anyone who has EVER employed a lawyer knows about expenses.

Cohen paid Stormy $360K to stop her smear campaign. Put it down as a $400K expense and embezzled $60K




So the FEC moved against Trump, or declined on lack of evidence?

You try so hard, yet fail so completely.



When I become prominent enough to pose a threat to their power.



It seem's you're just not very bright.
Trump was convicted of 34 crimes. He is a felon now.

It was also found by a court that
Trump is a Rapist!!

That leaves us to wonder why you support a rapist and a felon for President. Do you hate the US?
 
Trump was convicted of 34 crimes. He is a felon now.

But won't be in a year - as we both know.

It was also found by a court that
Trump is a Rapist!!

Still lying, huh?

Well, you are Communist - it is your nature.

That leaves us to wonder why you support a rapist and a felon for President. Do you hate the US?

Trump will restore the Constitution - which scares the hell out of your Stalinists.
 
Back
Top