Thoughts on Steubenville

Of course you defended it. You praised rape as a natural part of being a "normal" male.



Oh, don't worry, sweetcheeks. I categorically stated the two rapist pedophiles you are defending will forever be considered pedophiles.

I'm thinking of an old phrase about birds and feathers...

Birds and feathers? Leave your deviant sex life out of this pole smoker. No wonder queers are so prone to getting infested with AIDS. What a waste of health resources. Maybe we should ban queers because if the burdens they put on the healthcare system with their immoral deviant behavior.
 
No it isn't. The point is that men (even teenaged men) should not (repeat - NOT) ever do what those animals did.

I think that it has been well established that what they did was pretty sick, there is no need to reiterate it over and over. I posted an article from the Guardian where they stated that those Big Red parties were notorious for that sort of behaviour and that teenage girl had lied to her parents about where she was going.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/17/steubenville-rape-trial-depressed-town
 
I think that it has been well established that what they did was pretty sick, there is no need to reiterate it over and over. I posted an article from the Guardian where they stated that those Big Red parties were notorious for that sort of behaviour and that teenage girl had lied to her parents about where she was going.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/17/steubenville-rape-trial-depressed-town

There is no doubt that getting drunk and passing out at a party is not smart. But what you asked me was whether or not that was the point. No, it is not the point.
 
I think that it has been well established that what they did was pretty sick, there is no need to reiterate over and over. I posted an article from the Guardian where they stated that those Big Red parties were notorious for that sort of behaviour and that teenage girl had lied to her parents about where she was going.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/17/steubenville-rape-trial-depressed-town

Look it is clear that Snarla and Homo Howey think it is irresponsible to teach young teenage girls to act responsibly and not put themselves where they can fall victim to predators.

They are so blinded by their ideology they can't even see common sense. Nobody here has defended the rapists. Not one. But, you can't tell that to Snarla
 
You and ila both prove your unable to incorporate new information. Your idiotic beliefs may have seemed rational in 1980 but its just foolishness now.

The same reason you think the unproven quotes of a corpse are always topical.

Newsflash for ya...

It doesn't matter what this rape was "about".

Rape is rape and regardless of whatever the "overriding reason behind the rape"...


IT.


IS.


WRONG.


Is that so hard to understand?


Yes, its wrong, ....did I say it wasn't ?....the reason for the rape certainly does matter....but its academic, not for you .....
 
Look it is clear that Snarla and Homo Howey think it is irresponsible to teach young teenage girls to act responsibly and not put themselves where they can fall victim to predators.

They are so blinded by their ideology they can't even see common sense. Nobody here has defended the rapists. Not one. But, you can't tell that to Snarla

In post #41, Tom asked "Isn't the point though that you wouldn't expect your daughter to get rat arsed like that and then allow herself to be humiliated in that way.".

While that may not be defending the rapists but it is certainly saying that the victim should be blamed. After all, isn't that the point?
 
In post #41, Tom asked "Isn't the point though that you wouldn't expect your daughter to get rat arsed like that and then allow herself to be humiliated in that way.".

While that may not be defending the rapists but it is certainly saying that the victim should be blamed. After all, isn't that the point?

No
 
In post #41, Tom asked "Isn't the point though that you wouldn't expect your daughter to get rat arsed like that and then allow herself to be humiliated in that way.".

While that may not be defending the rapists but it is certainly saying that the victim should be blamed. After all, isn't that the point?

I was specifically asking about you and you've turned it into a general observation.
 
There is no doubt that getting drunk and passing out at a party is not smart. But what you asked me was whether or not that was the point. No, it is not the point.

Not smart and obviously downright dangerous....I'm sure you would advise your daughters and even sons not to get themselves into this condition.

It may not be "the" point, but it certainly has to be "a" point......
.....If the 2 guys had any morals or values, they would not even consider having sex with a girl that has no capacity to give consent.....If she had better friends, they
would not have allowed this to happen to her in the first place....if she was sober, she could have defended herself if accosted by this kind of idiot...
....if she did not get blind drunk and pass out, she most likely would not have been raped, and 2 other students would not
be going to jail......or many other things could have happened instead of what actually what did happen....

That does not mean the event was caused by her or it was her fault.....the perpetrator of the crime is ALWAYS the one at fault in the end....

Read the underlined parts again so you don't get it wrong......
 
In post #41, Tom asked "Isn't the point though that you wouldn't expect your daughter to get rat arsed like that and then allow herself to be humiliated in that way.".

While that may not be defending the rapists but it is certainly saying that the victim should be blamed. After all, isn't that the point?


The point that SHE, this girl, this particular girl, might not be a victim.....the victim could have been someone else, or maybe even no one.....

Only the mountain climber can be killed falling off a mountain....if you ain't the mountain climber, it won't be you, will it....?


You insist on seeing an implication that was never intended, drawing a conclusion from your own biased mind that was never intended......
even after being told over and over that your mistaken and mis-interpriated the statement.
 
Last edited:
In post #41, Tom asked "Isn't the point though that you wouldn't expect your daughter to get rat arsed like that and then allow herself to be humiliated in that way.".

While that may not be defending the rapists but it is certainly saying that the victim should be blamed. After all, isn't that the point?

If a faggot has unprotected sex with an AIDS infested faggot, is the faggot to blame for getting AIDS?
 
Not smart and obviously downright dangerous....I'm sure you would advise your daughters and even sons not to get themselves into this condition.

It may not be "the" point, but it certainly has to be "a" point......
.....If the 2 guys had any morals or values, they would not even consider having sex with a girl that has no capacity to give consent.....If she had better friends, they
would not have allowed this to happen to her in the first place....if she was sober, she could have defended herself if accosted by this kind of idiot...
....if she did not get blind drunk and pass out, she most likely would not have been raped, and 2 other students would not
be going to jail......or many other things could have happened instead of what actually what did happen....

That does not mean the event was caused by her or it was her fault.....the perpetrator of the crime is ALWAYS the one at fault in the end....

Read the underlined parts again so you don't get it wrong......

Wow...another rapist pedophile defender.
 
Back
Top