Thousands of small banks will now disappear

Bijou said:
You play dumb and throw it out as bait. You developed your snark, snide bs with me during the misogyny arguments and I don't forget. Your political leanings have zero to do with your immature pettiness. Grow the fuck up and address me properly if you want me to engage you. Dismissed.
Click to expand...

So asking a persons opinion is playing dumb? Ok.

What were the misogyny arguments?
 
cawacko said:
What was the thread? I'd like to know what I said.
Click to expand...

I don't remember which thread or threads. You said very little DURING the discussions, but were obviously following along because you made a number of snarky, snide comments about you being a man or some such bullshit - it was a deliberate dig to insinuate that men in general were the 'enemy'. Typical uninformed, insecure-male horseshit. You dug the hole. Dig your way out.
 
Bijou said:
I don't remember which thread or threads. You said very little DURING the discussions, but were obviously following along because you made a number of snarky, snide comments about you being a man or some such bullshit - it was a deliberate dig to insinuate that men in general were the 'enemy'. Typical uninformed, insecure-male horseshit. You dug the hole. Dig your way out.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, can't say I remember the thread. Was probably fvcking around but many things can be taken the wrong way on the internet. I'm sorry you have the wrong impression of me but it is what it is.
 
Bijou said:
I like everything about it. :)
Click to expand...

Maybe you could explain why the Dodd-Frank law needs 849 pages, compared with 66 pages in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a 2002 law that overhauled accounting rules following the Enron scandal? The landmark Glass-Steagall Act, which created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and barriers between commercial and investment banking during the Depression, was only a slim 34 pages and that prevented a banking collapse like 2008 for over seventy years!!

Dodd-Frank is a "full-employment act," as the New York Times reports on the "legions of corporate accountants, financial consultants, risk management advisers, turnaround artists and technology vendors all vying for their cut."
 
Last edited:
cawacko said:
Asking why someone believes Dodd-Frank is good legislation is passive-aggressive? Ok.
Click to expand...

Attacking you is all they have. If they actually knew what was in Dodd Frank, they would discuss it. Instead, they just parrot 'it be good' and when asked why they attack you rather than show how little they know about the legislation. Standard left wing nut tactic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top