Thousands of small banks will now disappear

Bijou said:
Damo isn't stupid, but he goes to bat for Stupidville regularly here. I'm not interested in righty/retard assessments of my opinion or posting style. My leisure time's become very scarce lately. This is pure mindless entertainment for me at this point. I don't bother wasting moments trying to engage mean-spirited douchebags. It doesn't interest me in the least.
Click to expand...

So says the mindless mean spirited douchebag
 
Stargazer said:
Great news. More food-stamps and Obamaphones for the freshly unemployed.

With half the banks gone, the minority working class can forget it if they need a loan for anything.

Good times ahead!

Forward >>>>>>>>
Click to expand...

Another moron joins the board...
 
Superfreak said:
Except that it does the exact opposite. It strengthens the hold the big banks have and it makes them even bigger. It is also almost 900 pages of crap compared to the simplicity of Glass Steagall. The only way to stave off another potential financial sector mess is to break the big banks back up and let the pieces stand or fall on their own. Separate the investment banks from retail banks.
Click to expand...
Could you kindly illustrate how it strengthens the big banks?
 
Rune said:
I insulted Damo too, didn't you notice? OK, you win, I am sorry for pointing out your misogyny. Buddy buddy again?

JUST KIDDING. Bet I got you though huh? I love you Tom. You know that.
Click to expand...

It is bad enough when the Bitch Finder General, apologies to the late Vincent Price, sounds off but I expected a bit more from you, anyway I accept your apology.
 
Last edited:
Superfreak said:
Except that it does the exact opposite. It strengthens the hold the big banks have and it makes them even bigger. It is also almost 900 pages of crap compared to the simplicity of Glass Steagall. The only way to stave off another potential financial sector mess is to break the big banks back up and let the pieces stand or fall on their own. Separate the investment banks from retail banks.
Click to expand...

It imposes a shitload of new regulations for precious little return except for corporate lawyers and management consultants. It's like another carbon tax for them!!
 
Rune said:
Seriously? Read a thread much before jumping in? Cawackoff is a moron. Tom is the site misogynist.
Click to expand...

So, when she decided not to answer Cawacko, it was because Tom is a misogynist? What was it you said?.. I think it went something like: "read the thread much?"
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
It is bad enough when the Bitch Finder General, apologies to the late Vincent Price, sounds off but I expected a bit more from you, anyway I accept your apology.
Click to expand...

Tom, I am sorry for calling you names. You are a good poster. The ladies here are my friends too though.
 
To me the Economist has produced the best article on breaking down what's in Dodd-Frank and what the legislation requires from industry. I'm open to hearing from those who read this and disagree with what the Economist says and where/why you believe they are off.


http://www.economist.com/node/21547784
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top