Time Magazine...
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.2
- Start date
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I didn't think your post was that bad Damo.
Awww. Darla made a funny.
evince
Truthmatters
how many times Have been proven right and you have been proven full of shit and lies?
there were no broker rules for years due to republican maneuvering of the GLBact.
there was white phosphorous use in fallugia
the voting machines were insecure.
Bush did lie us to war.
what were you ever right about?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
You really want to be embarrassed on this yet AGAIN? You still have yet to show that you comprehend that the rules you scream and rant about were EXCEPTIONS to registration requirements. Prior to be put in place there was MORE regulation, not less. You moron.
1) Glass Steagall repeal
2) Broker rules, I actually know what they are... you don't
3) That you are a complete moron
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?55485-Bill-Clinton-signed-the-bill
chew on this.
in interm rules were never applied asshole
chew on this.
in interm rules were never applied asshole
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
From post number 3 in that thread (you posted it)
"Washington, D.C., June 2, 2004 - The Securities and Exchange Commission today voted to publish for comment proposed Regulation B. This new regulation is designed to implement provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 that delineate the securities activities banks may engage in without registering as brokers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934."
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.willkie.com/files/tbl_s29Publications/FileUpload5686/1890/Regulation_B.pdf
The six line into that tell you the interm rules were never allowed to impliment either.
The republicans made sure the banks had NO rules in acting as brokers.
they went to town making fucking money and FUCKED everyone else.
thank your republican party
The six line into that tell you the interm rules were never allowed to impliment either.
The republicans made sure the banks had NO rules in acting as brokers.
they went to town making fucking money and FUCKED everyone else.
thank your republican party
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2004-73.htm
SEC Votes To Propose Provisions Implementing Gramm-Leach-Bliley Bank Broker Rules
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2004-73
Washington, D.C., June 2, 2004 - The Securities and Exchange Commission today voted to publish for comment proposed Regulation B. This new regulation is designed to implement provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 that delineate the securities activities banks may engage in without registering as brokers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Regulation B Proposals
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) replaced banks' complete exception from the definition of "broker" with eleven "functional exceptions." The Commission today voted to propose new rules to implement the GLBA definition by defining some of the statutory terms used in the eleven exceptions. It also proposed a number of new exemptions for some particular bank activities, under conditions that are consistent with investor protections. All of these provisions build off of rules the Commission adopted in 2001 (Interim Rules).
SEC Votes To Propose Provisions Implementing Gramm-Leach-Bliley Bank Broker Rules
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2004-73
Washington, D.C., June 2, 2004 - The Securities and Exchange Commission today voted to publish for comment proposed Regulation B. This new regulation is designed to implement provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 that delineate the securities activities banks may engage in without registering as brokers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Regulation B Proposals
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) replaced banks' complete exception from the definition of "broker" with eleven "functional exceptions." The Commission today voted to propose new rules to implement the GLBA definition by defining some of the statutory terms used in the eleven exceptions. It also proposed a number of new exemptions for some particular bank activities, under conditions that are consistent with investor protections. All of these provisions build off of rules the Commission adopted in 2001 (Interim Rules).
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
so once again, when proven wrong, you resort to deflection?
Tell you what Desh... YOU provide us with the rules you want to discuss.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
can you read?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
wrong moron... what does the TITLE of that article say????
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
are you seriously this fucking retarded?
The 'rules' you keep harping about are exceptions to regulation registration requirements. Meaning once the rules were in place there were LESS regulatory requirements, not MORE.