Time to impeach the rapist already?

Dems to eye $18 million donor who helped steal Garland's seat

09 FEB 2019 AT 09:58 ET


Taking to Twitter on Friday night, Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D) hinted that there will be an investigation into a donor who gifted the Judicial Network with $18 million to steal the Supreme Court seat belonging to Merrick Garland.

As part of his observations on the Matt Whitaker hearing where he was confronted about a mysterious $1.2 million donation that funded his salary, Whitehouse said Democrats shouldn’t stop there.

‘Whitaker did political hit work for a front group called FACT that does not reveal its donors. Today he admitted that its donor was Donors Trust, an entity that hides the identity of right-wing donors. That means the unknown real donor hid behind two entities,” Whitehouse tweeted.

“Double-layered deception? Who tries that hard to hide? Not anyone up to any good,” he added.

.....the rapist confirmation was illegal, time for Congress to step in


[link provided upon request]
 
Dems to eye $18 million donor who helped steal Garland's seat

09 FEB 2019 AT 09:58 ET


Taking to Twitter on Friday night, Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D) hinted that there will be an investigation into a donor who gifted the Judicial Network with $18 million to steal the Supreme Court seat belonging to Merrick Garland.

As part of his observations on the Matt Whitaker hearing where he was confronted about a mysterious $1.2 million donation that funded his salary, Whitehouse said Democrats shouldn’t stop there.

‘Whitaker did political hit work for a front group called FACT that does not reveal its donors. Today he admitted that its donor was Donors Trust, an entity that hides the identity of right-wing donors. That means the unknown real donor hid behind two entities,” Whitehouse tweeted.

“Double-layered deception? Who tries that hard to hide? Not anyone up to any good,” he added.

.....the rapist confirmation was illegal, time for Congress to step in


[link provided upon request]

Garland's seat wasn't stolen. The way things were done had been approved by Joe Biden 25 years earlier when a Republican was President and running for re-election.
 
yes, it was

Not according to the standard set by Biden in 1992.

You can't steal something someone doesn't have and doesn't belong to him/her.

Trump has two confirmations and when Ginsburg finally does the country a favor and stops breathing, Trump will get #3. The Republicans have a greater majority now than when you haters tried to smear the good name of his 2nd appointee.
 
Not according to the standard set by Biden in 1992.

You can't steal something someone doesn't have and doesn't belong to him/her.

Trump has two confirmations and when Ginsburg finally does the country a favor and stops breathing, Trump will get #3. The Republicans have a greater majority now than when you haters tried to smear the good name of his 2nd appointee.

oh I see, Biden is the reason McConnell refused to even bring his nomination to the floor

you're a piece of shit klan boy, go fuck yourself
 
Dems to eye $18 million donor who helped steal Garland's seat

[link provided upon request]

Link provided upon request?

Was that article copyrighted? :thinking:

5. When Posting Copyrighted Material.. All material posted from copyrighted material MUST contain a link to the original work.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?2-Rules-of-the-Board!
 
Dems to eye $18 million donor who helped steal Garland's seat

09 FEB 2019 AT 09:58 ET


Taking to Twitter on Friday night, Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D) hinted that there will be an investigation into a donor who gifted the Judicial Network with $18 million to steal the Supreme Court seat belonging to Merrick Garland.

As part of his observations on the Matt Whitaker hearing where he was confronted about a mysterious $1.2 million donation that funded his salary, Whitehouse said Democrats shouldn’t stop there.

‘Whitaker did political hit work for a front group called FACT that does not reveal its donors. Today he admitted that its donor was Donors Trust, an entity that hides the identity of right-wing donors. That means the unknown real donor hid behind two entities,” Whitehouse tweeted.

“Double-layered deception? Who tries that hard to hide? Not anyone up to any good,” he added.

.....the rapist confirmation was illegal, time for Congress to step in


[link provided upon request]
Strange OP. Clinton was impeached. Which has nothing to do with anything mentioned in the OP.
 
Dems to eye $18 million donor who helped steal Garland's seat

09 FEB 2019 AT 09:58 ET


Taking to Twitter on Friday night, Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D) hinted that there will be an investigation into a donor who gifted the Judicial Network with $18 million to steal the Supreme Court seat belonging to Merrick Garland.

As part of his observations on the Matt Whitaker hearing where he was confronted about a mysterious $1.2 million donation that funded his salary, Whitehouse said Democrats shouldn’t stop there.

‘Whitaker did political hit work for a front group called FACT that does not reveal its donors. Today he admitted that its donor was Donors Trust, an entity that hides the identity of right-wing donors. That means the unknown real donor hid behind two entities,” Whitehouse tweeted.

“Double-layered deception? Who tries that hard to hide? Not anyone up to any good,” he added.

.....the rapist confirmation was illegal, time for Congress to step in


[link provided upon request]

Impeach him already.

What are you waiting on? Democrats have occupied the House for well over a month and they haven’t impeached anyone yet lol.
 
oh I see, Biden is the reason McConnell refused to even bring his nomination to the floor

you're a piece of shit klan boy, go fuck yourself

The standard that McConnell followed was one the Democrats had no problem following when it suited them. It's not a matter of whether it was right or wrong. It's a matter of if the Democrats are going to follow a standard, their only concern when it's the other side in the same situation is to STFU.

I'm not the one that's crying like a little bitch because a situation one of his own followed and benefited from is followed when you don't like the results.

As for Ginsburg, the sooner the better.
 
I suspect she already has, since there is no proof that she is alive.

I suspect you are correct. If she was alive, RG and the rest of the lefties on this forum would be fighting each other to see who could show proof first.
 
Dems to eye $18 million donor who helped steal Garland's seat

09 FEB 2019 AT 09:58 ET


Taking to Twitter on Friday night, Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D) hinted that there will be an investigation into a donor who gifted the Judicial Network with $18 million to steal the Supreme Court seat belonging to Merrick Garland.

As part of his observations on the Matt Whitaker hearing where he was confronted about a mysterious $1.2 million donation that funded his salary, Whitehouse said Democrats shouldn’t stop there.

‘Whitaker did political hit work for a front group called FACT that does not reveal its donors. Today he admitted that its donor was Donors Trust, an entity that hides the identity of right-wing donors. That means the unknown real donor hid behind two entities,” Whitehouse tweeted.

“Double-layered deception? Who tries that hard to hide? Not anyone up to any good,” he added.

.....the rapist confirmation was illegal, time for Congress to step in


[link provided upon request]

Clinton was already impeached. Duh
 
The liberals will try to smear Trumps third nominee as well.
Trump should nominate a strict conservative black women who is transgender and disabled and who’s DNA says she is 1/5000 Native American. What would the liberals do with that one.
 
Back
Top