Time to Revisit the Legalized Murder Travesty
- Thread starter Granule
- Start date
Said the drooling degenerate...
Robo
Verified User
Apparently not worth repeating since you haven’t taken the time to do so. Probably embarrassed about it and unwilling to defend it, right?
Elitist holier-than thou alleged “morals and standards” that attempt to assume the righteousness of God as your own giving you some perverted right to mind other people’s business and ignore the constitutional rule of law.
Then since you allegedly “understand” that the Constitution was written for ALL , you can provide a rational explanation of WHY you wish to prohibit the 4th amendment rights of women then, right?
Actually, the Constitution does not guarantee any rights to the unborn as I have often proven. Therefore, you have no constitutional evidence that abortion is a murder.
Existing constitutional rule of law gives no reason of evidence to overturn Roe V Wade. Therefore only a constitutional amendment can guarantee constitutional protection to the unborn, a quest you are avoiding proving you’re simply a busybody fake pro-lifer.
I know what you’re NOT doing. You’re not promoting a constitutional amendment, you belong to no such organized quest. You do NOT support a charity that provides homes for unwed mothers and supports orphanages and reduces the incentive for a woman to abort.
What you DO by your own admission is piss and moan about other people’s business, proclaim that your some kind of saintly elitist messenger of God ordained to introduce his wrath into human law ignoring the constitutional rule of law. In other words, you’re a fake Aunt Nancy busybody who’s only quest is minding other people’s business and thereby promoting more BIG government.
Your problem is you cannot produce any constitutional authority to prove that abortion is murder. There is NO constitutional protection guaranteed for the unborn as there is for the born. (see Amendment 14)
Again your claim here is absurd and bassackwards. The freedom of abortion requires no GOVERNMENT laws or enforcement, which is consistent with LIMITED GOVERNMENT.
Prohibition of abortion by government requires more LAWS and ENFORCEMENT which is consistent with BIG government.
In short, you're a tool for the democrat party, as you will fight for abortion rights to your very last breath.
Oh, you also can't shut the fuck up about the obvious.
Good for you, pussy.
Last edited:
More from the article:
Blackmun’s reasoning was ridiculous, his facts erroneous, his key historical claims demonstrably false. The process behind the decision was appallingly shoddy. Roe and Doe constituted a full-blown exercise in policy-making—the arbitrary (untethered to the Constitution) invention of a new nationwide abortion policy to reflect the personal preferences of a majority of the justices.
Even pro-choice legal experts don’t try to defend Roe on its merits. “What is frightening about Roe is that this super-protected right is not inferable from the language of the Constitution, the framers’ thinking respecting the specific problem in issue, any general value derivable from the provisions they included, or the nation’s governmental structure,” wrote the eminent constitutional scholar and Yale law professor John Hart Ely. “It is bad because it is bad constitutional law, or rather because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.”
Yet stunted perverts like Robopussy sit there smugly and defend this shit stain of a decision. Why? Is it because he's caved in to the political pressure or is it because he's just an idiot? Or is it both?
Blackmun’s reasoning was ridiculous, his facts erroneous, his key historical claims demonstrably false. The process behind the decision was appallingly shoddy. Roe and Doe constituted a full-blown exercise in policy-making—the arbitrary (untethered to the Constitution) invention of a new nationwide abortion policy to reflect the personal preferences of a majority of the justices.
Even pro-choice legal experts don’t try to defend Roe on its merits. “What is frightening about Roe is that this super-protected right is not inferable from the language of the Constitution, the framers’ thinking respecting the specific problem in issue, any general value derivable from the provisions they included, or the nation’s governmental structure,” wrote the eminent constitutional scholar and Yale law professor John Hart Ely. “It is bad because it is bad constitutional law, or rather because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.”
Yet stunted perverts like Robopussy sit there smugly and defend this shit stain of a decision. Why? Is it because he's caved in to the political pressure or is it because he's just an idiot? Or is it both?
Keeping the original link in pace with the lecture.....
http://www.lifenews.com/2014/01/21/r...-undemocratic/
http://www.lifenews.com/2014/01/21/r...-undemocratic/
Robo
Verified User
Your problem there is the fact that the Democrats endlessly accuse me of being a tool for the Republicans and also the fact that Democrats, just like Republicans have no loyalty to the Constitution and I do. I'm simply a constitutional literalist and tool for no political party but a Constitution promoter. As a matter of fact I detest all political parties for the perverted corrupt special interest they are.
The "obvious" being your hypocrisy and being a trash-mouth Aunt Nancy busybody who thinks you're ordained by God and some macho maleness gender superiority to control the bodies of women. The "obvious" You support NO crusade to amend the Constitution to guarantee all constitutional rights to the unborn. The "obvious" being you donate to NO charities that support homes for unwed mothers or orphanages and adoption centers, all proving you're simply a loud-mouth, trash-mouthed phony who cares nothing about limiting abortions and really couldn't care less about the unborn. You just want more BIG government to stimulate your macho male superiority. You're an authoritarian opposed to freedom. Why should I "shut up" about that? My quest here is constitutionalism and exposing the phony corrupt rightist and leftist brainwashed partisan lunatics like you.
There's no end to your problems. You have zero understanding of the intent of the Constitution, as you read it through the eyes of democrats. You hate life, you hate freedom, and your opinion on the Constitution jibes with no one of value.
Stop contradicting yourself. Nobody believes your bullshit.
Another important piece of the article:
"Since 1973 the Court has modified Roe while stubbornly clinging to its “essential holding.” But the Court’s abortion jurisprudence cannot forever withstand the weight of fact and reason.
Third, Roe is undemocratic. It struck down the democratically-decided abortion laws of all 50 states and imposed a nationwide policy of abortion on demand, whether the people like it or not. Because the Court lacked any constitutional warrant for this move, it usurped the rightful authority of the elected branches of government to determine abortion policy".
Leave it to the fucking leftists to force tyranny on the good people of this country. and you diapered moonbats are STILL fucking with the citizenry.
"Since 1973 the Court has modified Roe while stubbornly clinging to its “essential holding.” But the Court’s abortion jurisprudence cannot forever withstand the weight of fact and reason.
Third, Roe is undemocratic. It struck down the democratically-decided abortion laws of all 50 states and imposed a nationwide policy of abortion on demand, whether the people like it or not. Because the Court lacked any constitutional warrant for this move, it usurped the rightful authority of the elected branches of government to determine abortion policy".
Leave it to the fucking leftists to force tyranny on the good people of this country. and you diapered moonbats are STILL fucking with the citizenry.
Robo
Verified User
If there were a dime's worth of credibility to any of that, you'd actually be making a credible argument in opposition to my view of the Constitution. However you only contribute rambling insults, blabbering unfounded and unproven accusations and nary a sentence from the Constitution to back any of your pathetic laughable bullshit.
You speak for "nobody," huh?
I'm in your face with credibility, abortion lover. Point out how your views on the Constitution aren't right in line with the democrat party.If there were a dime's worth of credibility to any of that, you'd actually be making a credible argument in opposition to my view of the Constitution. However you only contribute rambling insults, blabbering unfounded and unproven accusations and nary a sentence from the Constitution to back any of your pathetic laughable bullshit.
You speak for "nobody," huh?
I speak for those who can't deal with Saul Alinsky disciples. Go fuck yourself.
Legionthecat
Double Platinum Catroll
I'm in your face with credibility, abortion lover. Point out how your views on the Constitution aren't right in line with the democrat party.
I speak for those who can't deal with Saul Alinsky disciples. Go fuck yourself.
Poor Granny.
Mr. Shaman
Seer
After losing the battle, over Never-Ending Appeals.....I think most "conservatives" would prefer to avoid the subject.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/innocence-list-those-freed-death-row
Mr. Shaman
Seer
Robo
Verified User
Sorry for you Aunt Nancy, but my "views" are correct and "in line" with the Constitution. Worry not, I'll never expect you a cheapskate peeping Aunt Nancy to admit that you've been raked over the "Robo Coals."
I speak for those who can't deal with Saul Alinsky disciples. Go fuck yourself.
Actually "you speak" for every authoritarian busybody Aunt Nancy in America who's agenda has never been to support charities that provide homes for unwed mothers and orphanages in an effort to "LIMIT" the incentive for abortions. You speak for the lazy rightwing busybodies that love to mind women's business but haven't ever even thought about creating or joining a crusade to amend the Constitution to guarantee constitutional protections to the unborn. You're just another fucking phony authoritarian busybody BIG government loving neo-con creep.
You and Leon Troll belong together, underpants.
Wake up and smell the democrat sauce, pussy. Your views are smothered in it. Just stop typing. You look ridiculous with my boot print on your ass.
Actually I speak for who I said I speak for, pussy. I speak for all those who either don't have the desire, or the skill, to debate with Saul Alinksy disciples. YOU are a Saul Alinsky disciple. You rarely make sense, and when you do make sense, it's about simplistic shit that everyone already understands. You, dumbass, are a bore. You're also an idiot, and of course, you are a pussy. Most of your views fall directly in line with the democrat party, and the funniest thing in all of this is, that you aren't even aware of it.
Wake up and smell the leftism. You're right in the middle of it.
Last edited:
Robo
Verified User
Well then now we all can expect you to re-post some or maybe just one of your alleged "boot prints" to prove that point, right? I'll wait!
Is that more of your alleged "boot prints?" Sorry Aunt Nancy but fucking insults just make me laugh and they prove you have squat when it comes to a rational debate. That's because you're just another fucking Aunt Nancy BIG government busybody who's only talent is minding other people's business.
Then you're announcing with this post that the Democrats have the right constitutional argument relative to the abortion issue, right Aunt Nancy? If their view is the same as mine, then they're constitutionally right and I have proven it.
Wake up and smell the leftism. You're right in the middle of it.
Leftist almost always promote BIG and BIGGER government that would put them more in bed with you Aunt Nancy, you love BIG authoritarian government. You want to use it to legislate your busybody holier-than-thou morals.
yes you will wait, pussy, as you're too dumb to answer the simplest of questions. Now toddle off to the beginning of my kicking your ass all over this thread and tell me what you find.
You mean "Is this one of your boot prints, Granule?" Why yes, pussy, it is. Are you tired of getting it kicked every time I respond? I suspect you would be, unless... unless you enjoy getting your ass kicked. Are you a masochist, pussy?
No, pussy, I'm arguing that you're a democrat. Prove me wrong.
Wrong again, pussy. You're trying to tell me that Government is smaller because of Roe v Wade. How dumb do you have to be, pussy?
This thread is about legalized murder. Are you for it, or are you against it?