TO: ANY Leftist who has ANYTHING to say about 01/06/21...

Please provide your indictments of people involved with BLM that were arrested for violence.
RQAA
Here is a rather extensive list of Trump supporters that were indicted that includes the indictments and charging documents.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases
None of them are Trump supporters. Trump does not condone violence or support Antifa or BLM.
As you read through the cases, you will find people that told the FBI they went to the Capitol because Trump told them to. You will find instances of people saying they had weapons to protect from Antifa.
They lie just like you do.
I challenge you to find a single indictment for arson where the person said they supported BLM.
RQAA.
 
There is no such thing as a faulted election.
Yes there is. Election fraud by Democrats on this scale faulted the election.
The states all certified their electoral votes
States do not certify electoral votes.
and Congress counted them and declared the winner all according to constitutional requirements.
Congress does not have authority to choose electors for any State.
 
Sure.. all the videos are fake.
No. Your claims about them are fake.
All the facebook posts in support of Trump by people that attacked the Capitol are fake.
True.
All the people that are pictured at multiple Trump rallies who also were in the Capitol on 1/6 are fake.
Not a crime to be at either.
I'll bet you are fake too.
You just failed the Turing test.
This photo must be fake...
It is.
I am curious why the GOP didn't want this investigated
They do.
if Antifa was behind all the violence.
It wasn't. The Democrats are.
Certainly, they would want the evidence to be presented to the public if that was true.
Already was. RQAA.
 
You don't recognize the Constitution of the United States not the constitution of any State. It is just the same as any other Democrat.

I do recognize that OUR National Constitution is not the same as the Constitution of any or all of the State Constitutions; you may be that simple but I'm not. But, there you go again; your first sentence and the second don't go together.
 
You can't just wish the evidence away, dude.

We don't have to wish the evidence away--it never appeared. We have been anxiously awaiting to see this evidence for eight months now.


Into the Night:

“Currently, it looks like GA is going to choose Republican electors.
AZ looks like it might also, but seems to be further away from actually choosing.”

“Only religions use supporting evidence. Science doesn't.”

“The phrase “freedom of speech” does not appear in the Constitution”
 
Well, I see you've set yourself up as a Constitutional scholar, yet you don't know what a militia is. That's a very improtant and pivitol word in OUR Constitution, you should figure it out. BTW, your first four sentences don't make any sense either.

tell us what a militia is..........according to your so called constitutional expertise
 
tell us what a militia is..........according to your so called constitutional expertise

I don't think I made any claim to any level of "Constitutional expertise", however, I think this would be a close aproximation of OUR Constitutions veiw:

A group of private citizens who train for military duty in order to be ready to defend their state or country in times of emergency. A militia is distinct from regular military forces, which are units of professional soldiers maintained both in war and peace by the federal government.

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Militia
 
I don't think I made any claim to any level of "Constitutional expertise", however, I think this would be a close aproximation of OUR Constitutions veiw:

Nice try, but dictionaries don't define words. No dictionary owns any word. The Constitution does not define 'militia' either.
 
Back
Top