Tonight's address

gfm7175 said:
Poor anchovies..................
Click to expand...
Tell the truth, you eat it all up, every time your Messiah utters “tremendous,” “amazing,” best,” “yuge” very yuge,” “most beautiful,”great,” “greatest,” “greatest in history,” mixed in with “never seen before,” “no one has ever done this before,” you believe it is “tremendous,” “amazing,” best,” “yuge” very yuge,” “most beautiful,”great,” “greatest,” “greatest in history,” mixed in with “never seen before,” “no one has ever done this before”
 
archives said:
Tell the truth, you eat it all up, every time your Messiah utters “tremendous,” “amazing,” best,” “yuge” very yuge,” “most beautiful,”great,” “greatest,” “greatest in history,” mixed in with “never seen before,” “no one has ever done this before,” you believe it is “tremendous,” “amazing,” best,” “yuge” very yuge,” “most beautiful,”great,” “greatest,” “greatest in history,” mixed in with “never seen before,” “no one has ever done this before”
Click to expand...

Hume said:
You are seriously fucked up. No joke. My god!
Click to expand...

Poor Anchovies.
 
Diogenes said:
iu




Tonight, March 4, 2025, victorious President Donald J. Trump is scheduled to deliver an eagerly anticipated address to a joint session of Congress at 9:00 p.m. ET in the Chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

This will be his first major address to the corrupt, compromised Congress-critter cabal since triumphantly taking office for his second term on January 20, 2025, and his fifth public address to a joint session of solons and shysters overall.

Unlike a State of the Union address, which typically reflects on the past year, this superlative speech is eagerly expected to focus on laying out the longed-for legislative platform of profoundly popular priorities for his admirable administration's agenda to firmly thrust America and all Americans forward despite the feeble fretting of fear-crazed fools flailing in opposition.

While the exact content of the admirable address remains speculative until delivered by the famously off-the-cuff leader of the free world, sagacious sources suggest that triumphant Trump will eagerly elucidate his winning "America First" vision vindicated by his victory vanquishing the dishonest Democrat duo of DEI dunces known as Shamala Hairless and Tampon Tim "no-balls" Walz.

This could include popular topics such as the ongoing major housecleaning of the bloated and corrupt federal government bureaucracy, long-overdue debt reduction efforts led by DOGE (the excellent efficiency reforms led by African-American immigrant Elon Musk), new tariffs establishing a new reality for Canada, Mexico, and China, and sensible shifts in U.S. foreign policy—potentially addressing the recent fuck-up by delusional diminutive dictator Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Posts on social media and Trump’s own Truth Social statement, “TOMORROW NIGHT WILL BE BIG. I WILL TELL IT LIKE IT IS!” hint at a bold tone, with some speculating about a theme encompassing “The Renewal of the American Dream”, which disloyal demented Democrats definitely decry.

He may also highlight early actions like tightened border security, cuts to diversity programs, and economic promises from his campaign.

The speech will be presided over by House Speaker Mike Johnson and Vice President JD Vance, with Republicans holding majorities in both the House and Senate, easing the path for Trump’s agenda.

Following the address, menstruating Democrat Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan will deliver the feeble leftist counterpoints, likely focusing on egg prices and Russian collusion, with Representative Adriano Espaillat providing a Spanish-language response for the millions of illegal immigrants who support the Democrats.

JPP Boomers who still own televisions can watch the address live on dying TV networks like ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News, NBC, and PBS, which will offer coverage for the aged and infirm starting around 9:00 p.m. ET, with some providing pre- and post-speech partisan propaganda which is doubtless already scripted.

Streaming options include C-SPAN, network websites, and platforms like Disney+, Hulu, and YouTube (via channels like PBS News).

Radio coverage will be available on ABC News Radio and other stations for superannuated radio enthusiasts like @archives.

For real-time sentiment, posts on JustPlainPolitics.com may reflect public reactions as the event unfolds.

Retarded takes from the left are expected.
Click to expand...
Did you compose that yourself? (y)
 
I gave up on State of the Unions after Clinton keep yapping on and on about stuff that never mattered except as propaganda.

They are performances.
 
Braindead Biden spent 4 years sniffing children & liberals pretended he was normal.

Trump refuses to continue funding a European war indefinitely & unconditionally and he's "betraying" a foreign country we don't even have a mutual assistance treaty with.
 
For the lying lefties: The United States has several agreements with Ukraine that could be considered treaties or treaty-like in nature, though the term "treaty" can depend on context and legal interpretation. Here’s a breakdown based on available information:
  1. Budapest Memorandum (1994): This is not a formal treaty in the sense of a legally binding defense pact ratified by the U.S. Senate, but rather a political agreement. Signed on December 5, 1994, by the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, and Ukraine, it provided security assurances to Ukraine in exchange for its accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear-weapon state. The U.S. promised to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty, independence, and existing borders and to refrain from the threat or use of force against Ukraine. However, it does not obligate the U.S. to militarily defend Ukraine, which has been a point of contention since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 and subsequent aggression.
  2. U.S.-Ukraine Charter on Strategic Partnership (2021): Signed on November 10, 2021, this agreement outlines enhanced cooperation in defense, security, economic, and other areas. It reaffirms U.S. support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and its aspirations to join NATO, but it is not a mutual defense treaty. It’s more of a framework for bilateral relations rather than a binding commitment to military intervention.
  3. Bilateral Security Agreement (2024): On June 13, 2024, Presidents Biden and Zelenskyy signed a 10-year bilateral security agreement during the G7 Summit in Italy. This agreement commits the U.S. to provide long-term military assistance, training, and support to strengthen Ukraine’s defense capabilities against Russian aggression. It aims to bolster Ukraine’s integration into Euro-Atlantic structures and deter future aggression, but it explicitly states it is not a mutual defense pact like NATO’s Article 5. It’s a significant step, but it falls short of a formal treaty requiring Senate ratification under U.S. law.
  4. Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (1998): Signed on July 22, 1998, and ratified by the U.S. Senate in 2000, this is a formal treaty focused on cooperation in criminal investigations and prosecutions. It’s narrower in scope and unrelated to military or security obligations.
  5. Bilateral Investment Treaty (1996): Entered into force on November 16, 1996, this treaty promotes economic cooperation and protects investments between the two countries. It’s another example of a formal treaty, but it’s economic rather than security-focused.
In U.S. legal terms, a "treaty" refers to an agreement ratified by a two-thirds vote in the Senate under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution. The Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty and the Bilateral Investment Treaty fit this definition.

The U.S. does not have such a treaty with Ukraine. The Budapest Memorandum, the 2021 Charter, and the 2024 Security Agreement are executive agreements or political commitments, not Senate-ratified treaties, and they do not legally bind the U.S. to defend Ukraine militarily.

So, to answer directly: Yes, the U.S. has treaties with Ukraine (e.g., legal assistance and investment), but it does not have a mutual defense treaty obligating military protection. The security-related agreements are significant but lack the binding force of a formal defense treaty.



@Grok
 
People call Donald Trump all kinds of puerile names because disliking him is fashionable and socially convenient, but I haven't seen him put a foot wrong yet. He's doing all the things he was elected to do by a massive majority, and if the statement from Zelensky this afternoon is anything to go by, he's putting a stop to the most dangerous fighting since 1945. Puts our warmongering political pygmies to shame.


GlOCW84WcAAQjvZ
 
Democrats swathed in pink in faux "unity with women", after voting to allow deranged men to pummel them in women's sports.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top