SmarterthanYou
rebel
no, it isn't. you are completely and totally incorrect. face it.
Torture impairs ability to tell the truth
- Thread starter FUCK THE POLICE
- Start date
no, it isn't. you are completely and totally incorrect. face it.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
The Southern Man was not owned. The Constitution was written by "The People of the United States", and these people have no right, duty or obligation to set rules for the rest of the world.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Since we signed the UN Resolution which bans torture. And since waterboarding fits the UN Resolution's definition of torture.
What we did was illegal.
I am still waiting for anyone to explain the difference bwteen what the japanese did and what we did.
What we did was illegal.
I am still waiting for anyone to explain the difference bwteen what the japanese did and what we did.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Repeating the same shit just makes it more shitty.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
You have done so this entire thread.
The waterboarding of the detainees was illegal.
It doesn't get any simpler.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
irrelevant. the constitution was written to prescribe certain powers to the central government and nothing else. the rest of the world doesn't even come in to play. It's all about defining the federal governments powers and restrictions.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Exactly, so it doesn't define rights for non US Citizens. *shrug*
SmarterthanYou
rebel
it doesn't need to. the framers wrote the constitution with full knowledge that all people had rights. That 'all men are created equal' doctrine. your strawman fails.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
All men are created equal; it's what they choose to do after that that defines their legality. Your strawman fails.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
STY has got you on this one.
But I think the proper view of this subject is more within the limits of our signing a UN Resolution that forbids torture. And that same resolution defines torture in such a way that it include waterboarding.
So what was done was illegal.
But I think the proper view of this subject is more within the limits of our signing a UN Resolution that forbids torture. And that same resolution defines torture in such a way that it include waterboarding.
So what was done was illegal.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
STFU Solitary you have no standing to judge anybody.
Show us some pictures of the wife and kids.
Show us some pictures of the wife and kids.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Au contraire, I have equal standing with all americans.
And the facts I stated are not disputed by anyone who has done the research.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Show us some pictures of the wife and kids.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Stick with the topic. I am not showing you pictures of anyone in my family.
Have you read the UN Resolution on Torture?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
As I recall he Japanese methods have been described fairly recently on this very board. Perhaps you should spend less time reading Solitary's old posts (prior to him losing his job and his nervous breakdown) and read more current posts.
In other words, get your priorities straight and do your own research.
Bottom line... if you KNOW the differences, then POST them... don't give some 'well, I think they were posted before by someone else' comment and make everyone else go searching for something that may or may not exist.
STATE THE DIFFERENCES... or admit you just made it up.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
The principle is the same irrespective of the individual circumstances.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Dont hold your breath... there is no difference. That is why he refuses to answer the question.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
That's like saying that hitting someone with a squirt gun is the same as using a fire hose.