Transgender Democrat shoots up Christian school a hate crime.

So tell us all Dutch, just how did the 1994 AWB "punish" Americans, as opposed to the banned weapons formerly on the list now laying waste to people because it's the overall weapon of choice for mass shooters? We'll wait.

AR's were never banned, only on the democrat's wishlist. The only reason it's the weapon of choice in mass shootings is because of all the publicity it's given by the liberal press.
 
So tell us all Dutch, just how did the 1994 AWB "punish" Americans, as opposed to the banned weapons formerly on the list now laying waste to people because it's the overall weapon of choice for mass shooters? We'll wait.

Who is "us"? You and your tape worm?

I believe restricting the rights of innocent Americans because of your personal fears and feelings of inadequacy is, indeed, punishment.

Saying "We'll" is stupid, dumbass. You think it makes you look stronger, but it's no different from another online anonymous dumbass bragging about their Ferrari, golf score and trophy wife.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
So tell us all Dutch, just how did the 1994 AWB "punish" Americans, as opposed to the banned weapons formerly on the list now laying waste to people because it's the overall weapon of choice for mass shooters? We'll wait.

Actually dumbfuck, if you want to talk about mass shooters you have to talk about gangs...and they're not using AR-15's.

:palm: During the daytime, put on your socks & shoes, toddle over to your nearest police precinct, and let them explain to you the how's and why's they categorize "mass shootings" and gang related shootings differently. Or give the reading audience links to the FBI or ATF and such pages that back what you say, because I personally am sick and tired of you gun flunky's mental flatulence posing as facts & logic.

You and your like minded gun flunkies STILL cannot explain why the majority of mass shootings done in the last what, 20 years or so, were done with weapons that were formerly on the 1994 AWB list. Cowards.
 
Actually dumbfuck, if you want to talk about mass shooters you have to talk about gangs...and they're not using AR-15's.

Rarely are ARs used. Big difference between walking down the streets of New York, Detroit, Chicago or LA with an AR instead of two 9mm handguns under a coat.

The Bill Clinton inspired Democratic Party fascination with AR-15s is partly fearmongering and partly as a political first step to total disarmament of the population...except for the rich. LOL

Does anyone here really think the Clinton's guards, both during and after Bill's Presidency, didn't have guards with automatic weapons?

Bill banned semi-automatic rifles yet continued to benefit from the tool. That type of hypocrisy is the #1 reason why I'll never vote Democrat. The fact Bill faced the nation and lied to our face more than once is another reason.

FWIW, the fucking Trumpers jump on me for trashing Trump for being a lying, adulterous draft-dodging pieces of shit yet they never say squat about me doing the same to Slick Willie. This is one reason why I no longer vote Republican.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
So tell us all Dutch, just how did the 1994 AWB "punish" Americans, as opposed to the banned weapons formerly on the list now laying waste to people because it's the overall weapon of choice for mass shooters? We'll wait.



Who is "us"? You and your tape worm?

I believe restricting the rights of innocent Americans because of your personal fears and feelings of inadequacy is, indeed, punishment.

Saying "We'll" is stupid, dumbass. You think it makes you look stronger, but it's no different from another online anonymous dumbass bragging about their Ferrari, golf score and trophy wife.

No, my self described arrogant asshole friend...I refer to the readers (that includes others than the usual suspects). Or are you so disturbed by the mere fact that you can't logically or factually support (much less prove) one of your contentions that you must throw this hissy fit.

A pathetic display by you, Dutch. Sad.
 
:palm: During the daytime, put on your socks & shoes, toddle over to your nearest police precinct, and let them explain to you the how's and why's they categorize "mass shootings" and gang related shootings differently. Or give the reading audience links to the FBI or ATF and such pages that back what you say, because I personally am sick and tired of you gun flunky's mental flatulence posing as facts & logic.

You and your like minded gun flunkies STILL cannot explain why the majority of mass shootings done in the last what, 20 years or so, were done with weapons that were formerly on the 1994 AWB list. Cowards.

You want links? OK, but you do it first. You don't supply links. Start doing that and I may start to respect your opinion.
 
AR's were never banned, only on the democrat's wishlist. The only reason it's the weapon of choice in mass shootings is because of all the publicity it's given by the liberal press.

Um, why don't you stop being an asshole and actually READ what others write before you respond? Go read the original list of banned weapons on the 1994 AWB list. Remember, all guns bought legally BEFORE the list went into legal effect were exempt. No gun shop/retailer could sell them afterwards until the sunset in 2004.

And yes, genius.....the advertising worked because THE WEAPONS WORKED EXACTLY AS ADVERTISED. Which is why not only were they popular among "regular" gun enthusiast (great sales after 2004), but a favorite among the mass shooters (sad to say). Capice'? If so, maybe you can pick up the gauntlet for Dutch and tell the reading audience how the American public was "punished" when the ban was in place, and how would they be punished if enacted again?
 
Um, why don't you stop being an asshole and actually READ what others write before you respond? Go read the original list of banned weapons on the 1994 AWB list. Remember, all guns bought legally BEFORE the list went into legal effect were exempt. No gun shop/retailer could sell them afterwards until the sunset in 2004.

And yes, genius.....the advertising worked because THE WEAPONS WORKED EXACTLY AS ADVERTISED. Which is why not only were they popular among "regular" gun enthusiast (great sales after 2004), but a favorite among the mass shooters (sad to say). Capice'? If so, maybe you can pick up the gauntlet for Dutch and tell the reading audience how the American public was "punished" when the ban was in place, and how would they be punished if enacted again?

That's actually true. The point of owning an AR is to kill people, specifically feds who overstep their bounds.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
:palm: During the daytime, put on your socks & shoes, toddle over to your nearest police precinct, and let them explain to you the how's and why's they categorize "mass shootings" and gang related shootings differently. Or give the reading audience links to the FBI or ATF and such pages that back what you say, because I personally am sick and tired of you gun flunky's mental flatulence posing as facts & logic.

You and your like minded gun flunkies STILL cannot explain why the majority of mass shootings done in the last what, 20 years or so, were done with weapons that were formerly on the 1994 AWB list. Cowards.


You want links? OK, but you do it first. You don't supply links. Start doing that and I may start to respect your opinion.

Why don't you stop being an asshole/liar, Guillermo? I supply links when needed....I've done so on this particular thread, as the chronology of the posts shows. You're just an insipidly stubborn and willfully ignorant MAGA mook with occasional bouts of troll-ism.

The thing is when taken to task, you gun flunkies can't logically or factually back up a lot of your contentions....you just bluff and bluster and try to detour the discussion. You fail. So either provide some valid proof of what you say or continue to blow smoke in anger instead of just conceding a point. Coward.
 
Um, why don't you stop being an asshole and actually READ what others write before you respond? Go read the original list of banned weapons on the 1994 AWB list. Remember, all guns bought legally BEFORE the list went into legal effect were exempt. No gun shop/retailer could sell them afterwards until the sunset in 2004.

And yes, genius.....the advertising worked because THE WEAPONS WORKED EXACTLY AS ADVERTISED. Which is why not only were they popular among "regular" gun enthusiast (great sales after 2004), but a favorite among the mass shooters (sad to say). Capice'? If so, maybe you can pick up the gauntlet for Dutch and tell the reading audience how the American public was "punished" when the ban was in place, and how would they be punished if enacted again?

Guns Like The AR-15 Were Never Fully Banned

Read, and become learned.

"The review for the DOJ concluded that bans on specific models or features of assault weapons had little to no discernible impact on gun deaths. If the law had any effect, the report said, it was most likely the result of bans on large-capacity magazines, which contain 10 or more rounds. (Large magazines allow shooters to keep firing without pausing to reload, a point at which their targets could run or fight back.) Calculations based on homicide reports in Jersey City, New Jersey, suggested that restricting large-capacity magazines might lower the number of gunshot victims by up to 5 percent."

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/guns-like-the-ar-15-were-never-fully-banned/
 
Why don't you stop being an asshole/liar, Guillermo? I supply links when needed....I've done so on this particular thread, as the chronology of the posts shows. You're just an insipidly stubborn and willfully ignorant MAGA mook with occasional bouts of troll-ism.

The thing is when taken to task, you gun flunkies can't logically or factually back up a lot of your contentions....you just bluff and bluster and try to detour the discussion. You fail. So either provide some valid proof of what you say or continue to blow smoke in anger instead of just conceding a point. Coward.

And you didn't supply a link. Why not? You can't?
 
No, my self described arrogant asshole friend...I refer to the readers (that includes others than the usual suspects).
]
Or are you so disturbed by the mere fact that you can't logically or factually support (much less prove) one of your contentions that you must throw this hissy fit.

A pathetic display by you, Dutch. Sad.
Ah, so you've appointed yourself spokesperson for the group. How awesome for you.

Dude, I've stated my beliefs both on this thread and often in the past. The fact you are upset with my beliefs is not my problem.
 
Rarely are ARs used. Big difference between walking down the streets of New York, Detroit, Chicago or LA with an AR instead of two 9mm handguns under a coat.

The Bill Clinton inspired Democratic Party fascination with AR-15s is partly fearmongering and partly as a political first step to total disarmament of the population...except for the rich. LOL

Does anyone here really think the Clinton's guards, both during and after Bill's Presidency, didn't have guards with automatic weapons?

Bill banned semi-automatic rifles yet continued to benefit from the tool. That type of hypocrisy is the #1 reason why I'll never vote Democrat. The fact Bill faced the nation and lied to our face more than once is another reason.

FWIW, the fucking Trumpers jump on me for trashing Trump for being a lying, adulterous draft-dodging pieces of shit yet they never say squat about me doing the same to Slick Willie. This is one reason why I no longer vote Republican.

You are SO full of it, Dutch. Your myopic version of reality is a joke...something you and your fellow gun flunkies impress each other with on the bar stools and at the shooting range.

Yes, handguns beat out assault rifles in the mass shooting dept. But are you really going to tell me that is justification for keeping the stats on AR-15 related deaths when those weapons need not be on the open market?
Here some examples of the reality:

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/26/1101274322/uvalde-ar-15-style-rifle-history-shooter-mass-shooting

https://www.everytown.org/solutions/assault-weapons/


The OP has been thoroughly disproven.

YOU have yet to explain how Americans have or will be "punished" by the 1994 AWB or a reinstatement of it. The reading audience awaits (still).
 
You are SO full of it, Dutch. Your myopic version of reality is a joke...something you and your fellow gun flunkies impress each other with on the bar stools and at the shooting range.

Yes, handguns beat out assault rifles in the mass shooting dept. But are you really going to tell me that is justification for keeping the stats on AR-15 related deaths when those weapons need not be on the open market?
Here some examples of the reality:

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/26/1101274322/uvalde-ar-15-style-rifle-history-shooter-mass-shooting

https://www.everytown.org/solutions/assault-weapons/


The OP has been thoroughly disproven.

YOU have yet to explain how Americans have or will be "punished" by the 1994 AWB or a reinstatement of it. The reading audience awaits (still).

And there it is. You just admitted they're not commonly used yet that's the focus of your wet dream ban. Why?
 
AR's were never banned, only on the democrat's wishlist. The only reason it's the weapon of choice in mass shootings is because of all the publicity it's given by the liberal press.
Um, why don't you stop being an asshole and actually READ what others write before you respond? Go read the original list of banned weapons on the 1994 AWB list. Remember, all guns bought legally BEFORE the list went into legal effect were exempt. No gun shop/retailer could sell them afterwards until the sunset in 2004.

And yes, genius.....the advertising worked because THE WEAPONS WORKED EXACTLY AS ADVERTISED. Which is why not only were they popular among "regular" gun enthusiast (great sales after 2004), but a favorite among the mass shooters (sad to say). Capice'? If so, maybe you can pick up the gauntlet for Dutch and tell the reading audience how the American public was "punished" when the ban was in place, and how would they be punished if enacted again?
^^^
Clear propensity for ignoring the posts of those with whom he disagrees.

While I'm against Trump and Trumpism, there's no fucking way I'm going to vote for a party that believes like TCL.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
No, my self described arrogant asshole friend...I refer to the readers (that includes others than the usual suspects).
Or are you so disturbed by the mere fact that you can't logically or factually support (much less prove) one of your contentions that you must throw this hissy fit.

A pathetic display by you, Dutch. Sad.


Ah, so you've appointed yourself spokesperson for the group. How awesome for you.

Dude, I've stated my beliefs both on this thread and often in the past. The fact you are upset with my beliefs is not my problem.

Dutch, you're pathetic. When your attempts at retorts are exposed as just blathering, you try to fine tune it. Sorry to inform you, but you can't dress up BS.

And STOP LYING. YOU SAID THAT THE 1994 AWB (or a reinstatement of it) was and would be "punishing" Americans. To date, you have yet to explain exactly how that works.

You and I know you can't logically, factually or rationally make that explanation. But just like the MAGA mooks you detest so much, you'll throw all types of BS in the air in hopes it will cover your folly. It won't Dutch, it just makes you an insipidly stubborn gun flunky. Sad.
 
Back
Top