Trial lawyers rejoice...

Cancel 2016.2

The Almighty
http://www.latimes.com/news/printed...1,1,3162160.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage

"The AFL-CIO, not surprisingly, puts the blame on management's shoulders. Sure, there have always been bullying bosses, said Karen Nussbaum, executive director of the union's Working America lobbying arm, but today some of them "don't even have good manners anymore."

If that doesn't sound like grounds for a lawsuit, at least four state legislatures are thinking about making it so.

A bill in New Jersey would give an individual the right to seek as much as $25,000 in damages if an employer created "an abusive work environment." Similar measures are pending in New York state, Vermont and Washington state. In California, a Sacramento-based group called California Healthy Workplace Advocates is working to revive a sue-the-boss bill that died in committee in 2003.

The bills are short on specifics, such as what exactly would constitute an abusive work environment, and their prospects are far from certain. The wisdom of giving employees new grounds to sue is debatable, considering the threat of frivolous court-clogging suits and laws at the federal level and in many states that already protect people against, among other things, sexual harassment and discrimination based on gender, race, pregnancy, physical disability and religion."

Gee... this is such a good idea....
 
http://www.latimes.com/news/printed...1,1,3162160.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage

"The AFL-CIO, not surprisingly, puts the blame on management's shoulders. Sure, there have always been bullying bosses, said Karen Nussbaum, executive director of the union's Working America lobbying arm, but today some of them "don't even have good manners anymore."

If that doesn't sound like grounds for a lawsuit, at least four state legislatures are thinking about making it so.

A bill in New Jersey would give an individual the right to seek as much as $25,000 in damages if an employer created "an abusive work environment." Similar measures are pending in New York state, Vermont and Washington state. In California, a Sacramento-based group called California Healthy Workplace Advocates is working to revive a sue-the-boss bill that died in committee in 2003.

The bills are short on specifics, such as what exactly would constitute an abusive work environment, and their prospects are far from certain. The wisdom of giving employees new grounds to sue is debatable, considering the threat of frivolous court-clogging suits and laws at the federal level and in many states that already protect people against, among other things, sexual harassment and discrimination based on gender, race, pregnancy, physical disability and religion."

Gee... this is such a good idea....


This reminds me of a Beavis & Butthead episode where they sued a girl in their class who was hot and distracted them from concentrating in class.
 
Oh look two righties bashing trial lawyers, how unusual. You don't see that a lot.

And no complaints about one agreeing with the other one either. How odd. I know i can't agree with anyone around here without being rode all day about it.
 
A bill in New Jersey would give an individual the right to seek as much as $25,000 in damages if an employer created "an abusive work environment."

Oh, the horror!

Screw it....let the free market decide workplace environment and safety conditions!
 
Oh look two righties bashing trial lawyers, how unusual. You don't see that a lot.

And no complaints about one agreeing with the other one either. How odd. I know i can't agree with anyone around here without being rode all day about it.

Who is complaining about you agreeing with someone else???

Now... on topic... give us the lefty point of view... do you think there should be lawsuits based on if a boss is "mean"???
 
Who is complaining about you agreeing with someone else???

Now... on topic... give us the lefty point of view... do you think there should be lawsuits based on if a boss is "mean"???

Oh a whole group of you people (righty males) were whining about it yesterday. You weren't there.

It says creates an abusive atmoshphere, and yeah, I'm fine with that.
 
Oh look two righties bashing trial lawyers, how unusual. You don't see that a lot.

And no complaints about one agreeing with the other one either. How odd. I know i can't agree with anyone around here without being rode all day about it.

Cypress doesn't ride you.
 
Oh... well they are bad bad bad bad boys then.

Let me re-phrase my question... the article states that the proposed bills are not clear as to what constitutes an "abusive" environment. Should this not be clarified? Because if not, then it opens it up to pure speculation and likely.... endless costly lawsuits.
 
Oh... well they are bad bad bad bad boys then.

Let me re-phrase my question... the article states that the proposed bills are not clear as to what constitutes an "abusive" environment. Should this not be clarified? Because if not, then it opens it up to pure speculation and likely.... endless costly lawsuits.

Well, it's a hard thing to clarify Sf. That's why we have judges I think.
 
Well, it's a hard thing to clarify Sf. That's why we have judges I think.

Like I said... a trial lawyers wet dream. A completely vague and subjective law that means open to a wide range of interpretations. But who cares, let's further clog our court systems with BS lawsuits and let judges determine what each vague law means to them.
 
Like I said... a trial lawyers wet dream. A completely vague and subjective law that means open to a wide range of interpretations. But who cares, let's further clog our court systems with BS lawsuits and let judges determine what each vague law means to them.

Why are you so worried about "clogging" our court system?
 
you are right... lets just fill our system with a bunch of frivolous lawsuits. What possible harm could come from that?

I think it is more harmful to be so worried about not "clogging" our courtrooms that we allow the worker and the consumer to be harmed at will.

I do not believe that clogged courtrooms is on any list of the most pressing problems the people face.
 
Why are you so worried about "clogging" our court system?
Let me see.... We already have complaints about how overclogged they are. Let's make the laws as vague as possible so that everybody can have a lawsuit going!
 
Back
Top