Trump 2020 win projected by 3 different models, New York Times op-ed says

Terri4Trump

Verified User
Trump 2020 win projected by 3 different models, New York Times op-ed says

The combination of a strong economy and the built-in advantages for an incumbent gives President Trump a "formidable" advantage in his bid for re-election, according to a New York Times op-ed.

Steven Rattner, who served as counselor to the Treasury secretary in the Obama administration and worked on the auto industry bailouts, explained in his piece that three separate projection models currently point to a win for Trump.

One model by Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, projects Trump's 2020 vote share as high as 56 percent given the economic boom, but that does not account for voters' issues with the president's personality.

"As recent polls show, if the election were today, he would lose to most of the Democratic hopefuls by a substantial margin; in the case of Joe Biden, by nearly 8 percentage points," said Rattner. A recent Fox News poll found Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden with a double-digit lead over Trump.

Fair's model -- which pegged Barack Obama's vote shares nearly on the dot -- showed Trump should have received 54 percent of the vote in 2016, but Trump actually got 48.8 percent against Hillary Clinton. "I’m quite confident that the gap was a function of the generally unfavorable rankings on Mr. Trump’s personal qualities," Rattner wrote.

A Monmouth University poll last week showed just 37 percent of voters believe Trump should be re-elected, while 60 percent prefer a new president. Rattner said in addition to Fair, two other projection models give Trump a clear edge.

"Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has looked at 12 models, and Mr. Trump wins in all of them. Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics has reached the same conclusion in his examination of the Electoral College," Rattner wrote


SOURCE LINK
 
665003303001_5047368658001_5046287584001-vs.jpg
 
Four more years to investigate and impeach.

Given that the House and Senate are both likely to have Dem majorities, there will be no cover for Trump.
 
Four more years to investigate and impeach.

Given that the House and Senate are both likely to have Dem majorities, there will be no cover for Trump.
Unlikely. You lefties have gone way too nutty for the American voter lol.
 
Given that the House and Senate are both likely to have Dem majorities, there will be no cover for Trump.

It's funny, most Americans seem to be supporting the DNC over the GOP, but don't like any of the Democrats running for president since they've lost their minds. So once again, Trump will win only due to a lack of enthusiasm for the Democratic candidate, but he will end up in a situation where the GOP still isn't that strong.
 
It's funny, most Americans seem to be supporting the DNC over the GOP, but don't like any of the Democrats running for president since they've lost their minds. So once again, Trump will win only due to a lack of enthusiasm for the Democratic candidate, but he will end up in a situation where the GOP still isn't that strong.

America can't survive a second Trump term!
Is that God's will,end The Beast,that came out of the sea?
 
It's funny, most Americans seem to be supporting the DNC over the GOP, but don't like any of the Democrats running for president since they've lost their minds. So once again, Trump will win only due to a lack of enthusiasm for the Democratic candidate, but he will end up in a situation where the GOP still isn't that strong.

If I was a Democrat I’d be pulling my hair out lol.

Trump is vulnerable because so many people’s brains shut down as soon as they hear the word ‘Trump’. TDS is a real thing and it’s prevalent enough to affect an election. I’m not talking about on here—I see it IRL.

But none of that seems to matter because Democrats can’t get behind a candidate that isn’t crazy. Biden isn’t crazy but he’s a weak candidate: he’s too old and he might as well have the word ESTABLISHMENT emblazoned on his forehead. The rest of them, maybe with the exception of Gabbard, are locked in a contest to see who can out crazy the rest.

I’ve been following politics a long time and I’ve never seen anything even close to this.
 
If I was a Democrat I’d be pulling my hair out lol.

Trump is vulnerable because so many people’s brains shut down as soon as they hear the word ‘Trump’. TDS is a real thing and it’s prevalent enough to affect an election. I’m not talking about on here—I see it IRL.

But none of that seems to matter because Democrats can’t get behind a candidate that isn’t crazy. Biden isn’t crazy but he’s a weak candidate: he’s too old and he might as well have the word ESTABLISHMENT emblazoned on his forehead. The rest of them, maybe with the exception of Gabbard, are locked in a contest to see who can out crazy the rest.

I’ve been following politics a long time and I’ve never seen anything even close to this.

Amen to all that.

Excellent, get out the vote! Remove the DEMON in chief.

You never offer anything intelligent do you.You are a full fledged imbecile.
 
America can't survive a second Trump term!
Is that God's will,end The Beast,that came out of the sea?

We didn't think we could survive a second Obama term but we did! Plus the economy is booming unlike Obama's so yes we will and be better for it.
 
Trump 2020 win projected by 3 different models, New York Times op-ed says

The combination of a strong economy and the built-in advantages for an incumbent gives President Trump a "formidable" advantage in his bid for re-election, according to a New York Times op-ed.

Steven Rattner, who served as counselor to the Treasury secretary in the Obama administration and worked on the auto industry bailouts, explained in his piece that three separate projection models currently point to a win for Trump.

One model by Ray Fair, a professor at Yale, projects Trump's 2020 vote share as high as 56 percent given the economic boom, but that does not account for voters' issues with the president's personality.

"As recent polls show, if the election were today, he would lose to most of the Democratic hopefuls by a substantial margin; in the case of Joe Biden, by nearly 8 percentage points," said Rattner. A recent Fox News poll found Democratic presidential frontrunner Joe Biden with a double-digit lead over Trump.

Fair's model -- which pegged Barack Obama's vote shares nearly on the dot -- showed Trump should have received 54 percent of the vote in 2016, but Trump actually got 48.8 percent against Hillary Clinton. "I’m quite confident that the gap was a function of the generally unfavorable rankings on Mr. Trump’s personal qualities," Rattner wrote.

A Monmouth University poll last week showed just 37 percent of voters believe Trump should be re-elected, while 60 percent prefer a new president. Rattner said in addition to Fair, two other projection models give Trump a clear edge.

"Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, has looked at 12 models, and Mr. Trump wins in all of them. Donald Luskin of Trend Macrolytics has reached the same conclusion in his examination of the Electoral College," Rattner wrote


SOURCE LINK

So now we know who anatta is going to blame next year when the results don't match the models.
 
Back
Top