I understand your position- but I believe that she would have launched the US into Syria on Izrael's behalf. In that respect the OP is correct.
She was/is viewed as an embittered crone seeking revenge in some form- just as unhinged as the incumbent but more difficult to dislodge.
Well, despite rumblings to the contrary, Secretary Clinton is completely out of the picture, now-- to pretty much everybody's relief.
The Democratic candidates will not be calling for an occupation of Syria.
The Democratic candidates will in most cases be the only ones with a chance to beat the Republican candidates.
Not coming out in massive numbers to vote for the Democratic candidates would be an abdication of social responsibility.
For better, or worse, and arguably worse many might say, the two-party system is here for the remainder of our republic's existence.
To those of us who reject attempts within the Democratic Party to move to the irrelevant center,
it is import to do what the tea-baggers and Tumpanzees did--
commandeer the other major party the way they did with the pachys.
Bernie gave it a good try running as a Democrat in 2016.
He wouldn't have been a blip on the radar screen running as something else.
Progressive liberals must wrest the Democratic Party from its centrist elements.
But when we don't immediately get our candidates nominated in the primaries,
we have to vote foir the Democrats who did get nominated.
It won't immediately forward all of our causes,
but it's the only way to block the hideous Trumpanzee policies.
That's extremely important, too.
Unless you love the oranguatan's ass,
you have to get to the polls in massive numbers and vote straight Democratic tickets.
Otherwise, you'll have the orangutan's ass in your face whether you like it or not.