Trump calls media outlets that don’t report on him favorably “a threat” and says “they shouldn’t be allowed to” say things he disagrees with

Damocles said:
Yet it was Nomad that I quoted. So, no... Not Earl.
Click to expand...
Nomad didn't do what you accused him of doing before you called him a misogynist while letting your fellow cultist scamper away. That was Earl. Are you high?

Damocles: "You wish, though it is interesting that you would realize that she is striking in appearance first and ignore her experience. Misogynist."
 
Diesel said:
Nomad didn't do what you accused him of doing before you called him a misogynist while letting your fellow cultist scamper away. That was Earl. Are you high?

Damocles: "You wish, though it is interesting that you would realize that she is striking in appearance first and ignore her experience. Misogynist."
Click to expand...
Nomad talked about her looks and pretended that she was incapable. That was misogyny. So, personally I think she looks good and is capable, and that she was hired because she was capable. While Nomad suggested the only reason she got the job was her looks... So, I spoke to the right person, quoted the post I was talking about, and used the correct word to get across the point I was making.

Not Earl. Nomad said what I quoted. I know this because it was his post I quoted...
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Your evidence that supports this delusion? Because when Congress investigated they couldn't find it.
Click to expand...

Judge limits Biden administration contact with social media ...​

1740356412109.png
Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2023/07/04 › judge-...




Jul 4, 2023 — A federal judge in Louisiana ruled Tuesday that the Biden administration likely violated the First Amendment by censoring unfavorable views on social media.
 
Earl said:
I don’t see him as insecure and any good CEO reacts quickly to contingencies.
Click to expand...
I watch him react to "insults" with the nuclear option every time. I see this in many insecure men. If you say something about him he doesn't like he goes into full on toddler anger mode. Then if you change your tune he'll just as quickly flip...

Look at "Little Marco" and "Desanctimonious" for examples.

If you never change your tune and continue to say things he dislikes he will go full on nuclear option on you. Think of Rosie O'Donnell or Senator Cheney...
 
Damocles said:
Nomad talked about her looks and pretended that she was incapable. That was misogyny. So, personally I think she looks good and is capable, and that she was hired because she was capable. While Nomad suggested the only reason she got the job was her looks... So, I spoke to the right person, quoted the post I was talking about, and used the correct word to get across the point I was making.

Not Earl. Nomad said what I quoted. I know this because it was his post I quoted...
Click to expand...
That is not what happened.

Earl said: "She is drop dead gorgeous, Nomady,

"Big improvement over the last A/G."

Nomad said: "Only to right-wing trumpers does the physical appearance of female officials figure into their assessment of how competent they are"

You said: "You wish, though it is interesting that you would realize that she is striking in appearance first and ignore her experience. Misogynist."

Just admit that you were wrong. It's not that hard.
 
Damocles said:
I watch him react to "insults" with the nuclear option every time. I see this in many insecure men. If you say something about him he doesn't like he goes into full on toddler anger mode. Then if you change your tune he'll just as quickly flip...

Look at "Little Marco" and "Desanctimonious" for examples.

If you never change your tune and continue to say things he dislikes he will go full on nuclear option on you. Think of Rosie O'Donnell or Senator Cheney..
Click to expand...


I posted about contingencies, incidents that require his attention.

Those, I care about.

I don’t care about his reactions to insults.

Most of us react to insults…sometimes correctly, sometimes poorly.

The "Little Marco" and "Desanctimonious" comments were in the heat of political battle and were meant to marginalize his opponents. It’s not nice but politics are far from nice.
 
Last edited:
Earl said:
I posted about contingencies, incidents that require his attention.

Those, I care about.

I don’t care about his reactions to insults.

Most of us react to insults…sometimes correctly, sometimes poorly.

The "Little Marco" and "Desanctimonious" comments were in the heat of political battle and were meant to marginalize his opponents. It’s not nice but politics are far from nice.
Click to expand...

The latter are extremely childish insults.

My bar for world leaders is set way, way above that.
 
Walt said:
This just keeps getting worse and worse.
Click to expand...
Jul 4, 2023 — A federal judge in Louisiana ruled Tuesday that the Biden administration likely violated the First Amendment by censoring unfavorable views on social media.

Get a clue, Walter.
 
A judge on Tuesday prohibited several federal agencies and officials of the Biden administration from working with social media companies about “protected speech,” a decision called “a blow to censorship” by one of the Republican officials whose lawsuit prompted the ruling.

U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty of Louisiana granted the injunction in response to a 2022 lawsuit brought by attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri. Their lawsuit alleged that the federal government overstepped in its efforts to convince social media companies to address postings that could result in vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic or affect elections.

Doughty cited “substantial evidence” of a far-reaching censorship campaign. He wrote that the “evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth.’ ”
apnews.com
 
Nomad said:
That ^^^^ is a perfect illustration and example of the kinds of stupid, propaganda pushing, doublespeak bullshit word games the right plays constantly.

Thank you for proving my point.

Hours of video evidence confirms trumpers rioted in an attempt to violently overturn the results of an election that Republican governors, election officials and appellate court judges all ruled was 100% fair and legal.

How do trumpers respond?

They lie, deny, obfuscate and twist reality.

That's the kind of dishonest, lying scum the right attracts.

Again, thank you for proving my point.
Click to expand...
Actually, you have no point. Just a typical left wing diatribe. To you anything that disagrees with your false narratives is misinformation.

You throw around the word insurrection until it no longer has meaning. There was no insurrection. There were no guns, no government was overthrown. At best it was people on a tour led by the Capitol Police.

But, far be it from me to dissuade you from your delusions.

The point of my post was that anybody can claim something is disinformation for the purpose of stifling dissent. I support free speech, no matter what. Even speech I disagree with. But, that isn't how you totalitarian types roll is it?
 
Teflon Don said:
Actually, you have no point. Just a typical left wing diatribe. To you anything that disagrees with your false narratives is misinformation.

You throw around the word insurrection until it no longer has meaning. There was no insurrection. There were no guns, no government was overthrown. At best it was people on a tour led by the Capitol Police.

But, far be it from me to dissuade you from your delusions.

The point of my post was that anybody can claim something is disinformation for the purpose of stifling dissent. I support free speech, no matter what. Even speech I disagree with. But, that isn't how you totalitarian types roll is it?
Click to expand...

First of all, you are lying about there being no guns. A large cache of weapons was found at a location not far from the Capitol, just in case it escalated to that point.

1000016316.jpg

apnews.com

Oath Keepers jury hears about massive weapon cache on Jan. 6

A member of the Oath Keepers who traveled to Washington before the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol testified Wednesday about a massive cache of weapons the far-right extremist group stashed in a Virginia hotel room.
apnews.com apnews.com

But an angry, violent mob exhorted by the outgoing President, allowed on the grounds of the Capitol which forced it's way into the building and the Congressional chambers, does not necessarily need guns to accomplish their goal.

You're just another lowlife traitor to your country who, like the rest of the J6 mob, deserves to be lined up against a wall right along with them in front of a firing squad.

🖕🏼
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top