Trump caving to Iranian demands to end the war without any resolution of Iran's nuclear program?

Cypress said:

Has the US accepted Iran’s demand to settle Hormuz first, nuclear later?​

US and Iran close to agreeing to a one-page MoU to end the war, even though there have been no detailed negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear programme.

Islamabad, Pakistan – On Monday morning, the United States Navy began escorting commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. By Tuesday afternoon, the operation had been paused.

President Donald Trump announced the reversal on Truth Social, citing the “request of Pakistan and other Countries” and “great progress” towards a “complete and final agreement” with Iran.

Earlier on Tuesday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that Operation Epic Fury, the air and naval campaign launched on February 28, was “concluded”.

What Washington now sought, he said, was a “memorandum of understanding for future negotiations”.

For weeks, that is precisely what Iran has been demanding.

In proposals passed on to the US through Pakistan, Iran has in recent weeks sought multistage negotiations, with a preliminary deal aimed at ending the war, and negotiations on the White House’s demands that Tehran end its nuclear programme pushed for later.

Trump and his administration resisted, with the US president insisting that getting Iran to give up its nuclear programme was central to any deal with Tehran.

Now, the US appears to have come around to accepting Iran’s demand, say experts. On Wednesday, the Reuters news agency and the US publication Axios reported that the US and Iran were close to agreeing to a one-page MoU to end the war, even though there have been no detailed negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear programme.


www.aljazeera.com

Has the US accepted Iran’s demand to settle Hormuz first, nuclear later?

US pauses Hormuz escorts after Pakistan-led mediation gains traction, signalling shift towards a limited framework deal.
www.aljazeera.com www.aljazeera.com
Click to expand...
After all of this, he will enter a nuclear agreement very similar to what Obama had created.
 
Nuclear has peaceful uses. It is used in medicine. It is used in research. It is used in agriculture. It is used in scientific research. Where do we get the power to say Iran cannot use it for those purposes?
 

Iran talks rife with confusion as Trump voices hope​



Trump has provided few details but maintains optimism about a war-ending deal.

Iranian and Trump administration officials “offered contradictory and rapidly changing assessments of the state of the war and peace talks,” The New York Times said, all “while providing few details about those negotiations.”

Who said what​


If Iran doesn’t agree to “give what has been agreed to,” President Donald Trump said on social media Wednesday morning, the “bombing starts,” and “at a much higher level and intensity.”

Hours later, he told reporters the two sides “had very good talks over the last 24 hours” and a deal was “very possible.”

An Iranian official dismissed the proposal as an “American wish-list.”
 
Nordberg said:
Nuclear has peaceful uses. It is used in medicine. It is used in research. It is used in agriculture. It is used in scientific research. Where do we get the power to say Iran cannot use it for those purposes?
Click to expand...


Precisely. America is not the ruler of the world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top