Trump has failed to get appeal bond for $454 million civil fraud judgment, lawyers sa

Joe Capitalist said:
Just for the record, the Saudis didn't 'give' Jared $2 billion as some sort of payment for services.
They gave him the money to be an investment custodian like a financial manager.
It is not and was never Jared's money to do as he pleases.
Click to expand...

I have always thought it was a money laundering scheme of some kind.
 
Joe Capitalist said:
Just for the record, the Saudis didn't 'give' Jared $2 billion as some sort of payment for services.
They gave him the money to be an investment custodian like a financial manager.
It is not and was never Jared's money to do as he pleases.

But that being said, the average commission to manage that much money is about 2% a year.
That's $40 million in Jared's pocket a year.
Click to expand...


Correct.

And lets remember the Saudi Fund is a very sophiscated fund with a Board that typical makes all decisions on any 3rd parties they would give money, to invest on their behalf, and they REJECTED Kushner, pointing out he was unqualified with no specific experience as a money manager and despite that he, Kushner, was asking for higher than average non refundable Management fees. It took the Crown Prince over riding the board to give Kushner the money.

And i do not think there were any investment restrictions imposed on Kushner by the Saudi's, meaning he could arguable use their money to invest in his own projects, thus double dipping on the benefits to himself.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
it must suck to be unable to back up your lies......
Click to expand...

Except i can...

Donald Trump’s Violations of the Emoluments Clause

...Trump’s numerous violations of the Emoluments Clause are well documented. He has repeatedly broken the Emoluments Clause through the entanglement of his business affairs and presidential responsibilities. Foreign countries have paid millions of dollars for space in Trump’s buildings during his presidency. The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, for example, has a $2 million (over £1.5 million) annual lease on one of his Manhattan properties. Throughout 2016-2017, the Saudi Arabian government charged up to $270,000 (approximately £205,000) in rooms at a Trump hotel in Washington D.C. Even officials, such as the Prime Minister of Malaysia, stayed in Trump’s properties during diplomatic visits to the country. Alleged Russian and Iranian election interference is also an example of undue influence corrupting the presidency and democratic processes in America. ...
Click to expand...

And never forget the prohibition on you when it comes to speaking on anything LAW, as you have a 100 percent track record of getting all legal matters wrong.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so some dimwitted law student from England, wrote a paper.....at least you didn't pretend it was someone who knew US law........
Click to expand...

At least you admit your lack of awareness of this, which is your norm on every topic you offer your worthless opinions on.

Now you can google the numerous US source ones that exist too, if you do not like that one.

That you are clueless on this topic, is on you, and all you.
 
QP! said:
At least you admit your lack of awareness of this, which is your norm on every topic you offer your worthless opinions on.

Now you can google the numerous US source ones that exist too, if you do not like that one.

That you are clueless on this topic, is on you, and all you.
Click to expand...

I am always willing to admit that the unaware are unaware........you are still unaware of anything regarding the law......so unless you have something that isn't a baseless accusation to back up your claims, go back to fucking yourself in the corner.....

here's a clue.....show me a conviction.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I am always willing to admit that the unaware are unaware........you are still unaware of anything regarding the law......so unless you have something that isn't a baseless accusation to back up your claims, go back to fucking yourself in the corner.....

here's a clue.....show me a conviction.....
Click to expand...

The same thing the Liberals said about Hillary for a couple of decades. LOL

I love the irony of MAGAts copying Liberals while simultaneously lambasting them.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
The SC needs to declare this NY law unconstitutional as it takes away the right to appeal.
Click to expand...

It does not take away the right to appeal. trump can appeal without a bond, but the judgement will start being implemented during the appeals process.

If the Supreme Court rules that unconstitutional, then all convicted defendants would have to be released without a bond whenever they applied for appeal. That would mean the release of anyone convicted, because they would all apply for appeal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top