It is trump's word against the victim's word. She has some corroborating evidence, but probably not enough to get past reasonable doubt. We can be 99.9% sure she was raped by Epstein, but only 90% sure she was raped by trump...
That hardly seems like qualifications to be president. Then again, we are also hearing that because trump could point to the picture of a giraffe, he should be president. I would expect a one year old to be able to point to a picture of a giraffe.