Trump: Its fake news.... Mueller report.... Nope.

Truth Detector said:
Who did Trump fire that was investigating him you deplorable dishonest hack??? :laugh:
Click to expand...

He ordered Mueller to be fired. Twice. The only reason Mueller did not indict him was because the Justice Department does not indict sitting presidents.
 
If you hire someone to kill your wife, you are not innocent simply because he does not do it.
 
TOP said:
It's over....
Click to expand...
YEP, the 40 million dollar hoax is officially over.

The nothing burger has been served, weighed and found wanting.

Time for the stupid libtards to apologize for dragging the country through a 3 year HOAX in an attempt to usurp the power of a duly elected POTUS.

That sounds like a crime, doesn't it?
 
Jarod said:
Rumppers, think about it this way, are you going to be okay with the precedent that if a Democratic President fires anyone trying to investigating him, its okay?

That idea effectively would put anyone above the law.
Click to expand...

Who did Trump fire?
 
Jarod said:
Pages 84 to 90 of volume 2 are quite clearly impeachable offences and should be acted upon.
Click to expand...

So now you admit there is no page 216? :laugh:

Page 84:

Also on June 13, 2017, the President's personal counsel contacted the Special Counsel's Office and raised concerns about possible conflicts. The President's counsel cited Mueller's previous partnership in his law firm, his interview for the FBI Director position, and an asserted personal relationship he had with Comey. That same day, Rosenstein had testified publicly before Congress and said he saw no evidence of good cause to terminate the Special" Counsel , including for conflicts of interest. Two days later, on June 15, 2017, the Special Counsel's Office informed the Acting Attorney General's office about the areas of concern raised by the President' s counsel and told the President's counsel that their concerns had been communicated to Rosenstein so that the Department of Justice could take any appropriate action.

[indent =3]3. The Press Reports that the President is Being Investigated for Obstruction of Justice and the President Directs the White House Counsel to Have the Special Counsel Removed[/indent]

On the evening of June 14, 2017, the Washington Post published an article stating that the Special Counsel was investigating whether the President had attempted to obstruct justice . This was the first public report that the President himself was under investigation by the Special Counsel' s Office, and cable news networks quickly picked up on the report. The Post story stated that the Special Counsel was interviewing intelligence community leaders , including Coats and Rogers, about what the President had asked them to do in response to Corney's March 20, 2017 testimony; that the inquiry into obstruction marked "a major turning point" in the investigation; and that while "Trump had received private assurances from then-FBI Director James B. Corney starting in January that he was not personally under investigation , officials say that changed shortly after Corney's firing ." That evening , at approximately I0:31 p.m., the President called McGahn on McGahn' s personal cell phone and they spoke for about 15 minutes. McGahn did not have a clear memory of the call but thought they might have discussed the stories reporting that the President was under investigation .

Beginning early the next day, June 15, 2017, the President issued a series of tweets acknowledging the existence of the obstruction investigation and criticizing it. He wrote: "They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice " "You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history-led by some very bad and conflicted people! "; and "Crooked H destroyed phones w/ hammer, ' bleached' emails, & had husband meet w/AG days before she was cleared- & they talk about obstruction?" The next day, June 16, 2017, the President wrote additional tweets criticizing the investigation: "After 7 months of investigations & committee hearings about my 'collusion with the Russians,' nobody has been able to show any proof. Sad!"; and "I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt."

Sorry snowflake, but now matter how you flail, this does not constitute anything remotely connected to obstruction. If it did, it would be the lowest standard ever set in the history of the cirminal justice department. You know it, I know it. STFU.

Now Page 90:

On June 14, 2017, when the Washington Post reported that the Special Counsel was investigating the President for obstruction of justice, the President was facing what he had wanted to avoid: a criminal investigation into his own conduct that was the subject of widespread media attention. The evidence indicates that news of the obstruction investigation prompted the President to call McGahn and seek to have the Special Counsel removed. By mid-June, the Department of Justice had already cleared the Special Counsel's service and the President's advisors had told him that the claimed conflicts of interest were "silly" and did not provide a basis to remove the Special Counsel. On June 13 , 2017, the Acting Attorney General testified before Congress that no good cause for removing the Special Counsel existed, and the President dictated a press statement to Sanders saying he had no intention of firing the Special Counsel. But the next day, the media reported that the President was under investigation for obstruction of justice and the Special Counsel was interviewing witnesses about events related to possible obstruction- spurring the President to write critical tweets about the Special Counsel's investigation. The President called McGahn at home that night and then called him on Saturday from Camp David. The evidence accordingly indicates that news that an obstruction investigation had been opened is what led the President to call McGahn to have the Special Counsel terminated.

There also is evidence that the President knew that he should not have made those calls to McGahn. The President made the calls to McGahn after McGahn had specifically told the President that the White House Counsel's Office-and McGahn himself-could not be involved in pressing conflicts claims and that the President should consult with his personal counsel if he wished to raise conflicts. Instead of relying on his personal counsel to submit the conflicts claims, the President sought to use his official powers to remove the Special Counsel. And after the media reported on the President's actions, he denied that he ever ordered McGahn to have the Special Counsel terminated and made repeated efforts to have McGahn deny the story, as discussed in Volume II, Section II.I, infra. Those denials are contrary to the evidence and suggest the President's awareness that the direction to McGahn could be seen as improper.

F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation

Overview

Two days after the President directed McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed, the President made another attempt to affect the course of the Russia investigation. On June 19, 2017, the President met one-on-one with Corey Lewandowski in the Oval Office and dictated a message to be delivered to Attorney General Sessions that would have had the effect of limiting the Russia investigation to future election interference only. One month later, the President met again with Lewandowski and followed up on the request to have Sessions limit the scope of the Russia investigation. Lewandowski told the President the message would be delivered soon. Hours later, the President publicly criticized Sessions in an unplanned press interview, raising questions about Sessions's job security .

1. The President Asks Corey Lewandowski to Deliver a Message to Sessions to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation

On June 19, 2017, two days after the President directed McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed, the President met one-on-one in the Oval Office with his former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski. Senior White House advisors described Lewandowski as a "devotee" of the President and said the relationship between the President and Lewandowski was "close."

Once again Brad, there is NOTHING here that could even come close to obstruction. The investigation was unhindered and conducted for TWO years. Mueller was not fired. Sessions did not attempt to prevent the investigation nor did Rosenstein. In fact, the HOAX continued unabated.
 
Jarod said:
He ordered Mueller to be fired. Twice. The only reason Mueller did not indict him was because the Justice Department does not indict sitting presidents.
Click to expand...

No he did not; he discussed it and Mueller was NEVER fired. What part of Mueller NOT BEING FIRED are you struggling with snowflake? Mueller didn't indict him because he had nothing to indict him for. You don't indict someone for doing something they never did you moron.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top