HE did not "question Mueller's conflict of interest" he ordered Mueller fired. Thats the difference between a crime or not.
Obviously Mullet disagrees with you.
HE did not "question Mueller's conflict of interest" he ordered Mueller fired. Thats the difference between a crime or not.
OK, even using your version how was that worse than what Trump did.
Clinton was not her boss, and there is no evidence Clinton instructed her to limit her investigation.
Rump wrote a memo instructing his attorney general to limit the investigation into himself. Much worse than what Clinton did, Yet you were out raged by Bill Clinton.
Bingo.
If Trump wanted Mullet fired bad enough—Mullet would have been fired. If merely discussing firing Mullet is a crime—then that’s a pretty broad interpretation of the law as it pertains to obstruction.
More importantly, as I’ve been explaining to these goof balls, it’s increasingly likely Barr is going to indict some people who instigated the very investigation Trump *discussed* obstructing.
I’ve been right about this thing for over two years and they still don’t listen to me lol.
HE did not "question Mueller's conflict of interest" he ordered Mueller fired. Thats the difference between a crime or not.
There were reports that Mueller was trying to investigate Trumps finances remember? It had nothing to do with collusion.
Keep spinning Brad
No Collusion
No Obstruction
Since there was never collusion and the Steele Dossier was total bunk, there should have never been an investigation. No obstruction Brad. But hang on to your delusions
Do you think Nancy will impeach? Do you Brad? What if she doesn't? Will you rise up? Will you stay home in 2020?
No evidence of Collusion was found. Rump clearly Obstructed Muellers efforts to find any such evidence.

Trump clearly endeavored to hinder the investigation, and that is a crime.
He ordered people to fire him. He endeavored to hinder the investigation.
No Brad; he didn't and no matter how desperately you lie and flail, your arguments are laughably stupid and unbecoming of anyone carrying a license to practice law.
No evidence of Collusion was found.
Rump clearly Obstructed Muellers efforts to find any such evidence.

There were reports that Mueller was trying to investigate Trumps finances remember? It had nothing to do with collusion.
Keep spinning Brad
No Collusion
No Obstruction
Since there was never collusion and the Steele Dossier was total bunk, there should have never been an investigation. No obstruction Brad. But hang on to your delusions
Do you think Nancy will impeach? Do you Brad? What if she doesn't? Will you rise up? Will you stay home in 2020?
I suspect that BRAD is fuming because he's used up his daily limit of threads in Current Events, TD.
Liberals demanded that "certain" posters be limited in their ability to start threads in a 24-hour period. Damocles complied.
Now that it's biting them in the ass, think they'll whine (like they do about threadbans - which they also wanted)?

PRICELESS!
Yup. Comey lied when he applied for the bogus FISA warrant.
YEP, the 40 million dollar hoax is officially over.
The nothing burger has been served, weighed and found wanting.
Time for the stupid libtards to apologize for dragging the country through a 3 year HOAX in an attempt to usurp the power of a duly elected POTUS.
That sounds like a crime, doesn't it?
it should be.
No evidence of Collusion was found.
Rump clearly Obstructed Muellers efforts to find any such evidence.
Wrong moron. How the fuck are you a lawyer?/
If Trump said, 'I would like to kill person x' and someone says 'that is illegal' and Trump then does not kill person x... no crime occurred.
Seriously, you should be disbarred.