Trump launches ‘large-scale’ attack on Venezuela, captures Nicolas Maduro and wife

Tobytone said:
Ok Jakey, I'll do this just for you. Focus and read this a couple of times to let it sink in. I'm going to pretend I'm explaining it to my 5 year old nephew:

We sent our police soldiers to Venezuela to catch a bad guy named Maduro, like when cops arrest a criminal who sells really bad drugs that hurt people here.

He had a big warrant for being a super bad drug boss, so we grabbed him and brought him here for a fair trial in court.

It's not like starting a big war because we're just doing police work to stop a dangerous crook, not fighting the whole country.
Click to expand...
Maybe he will get his big sister to read it to him.
 
Tobytone said:
Chives is clearly delusional, a perfect example of the kind of brain that's been running things. Can you imagine? I was just thinking about how lucky we are on the right. I think we take it for granted just how often we end up on the right side of history. Does that require being brilliant strategists or taking risks on dicey choices that could go either way? Nah, it's dead simple. How many genders are there? Two. A person born with a penis is a man, a person born with a vagina is a woman. A guy shooting a CEO in cold blood is a bad thing. Being shot dead for your speech isn't the same as getting booted because you suck at your job. Violent criminals shouldn't be released back onto the streets at all, let alone without bail. Sanctuary cities are illegal. Indicted narco-terrorists should be arrested, etc.

Now imagine being a dipshit like this and taking the opposite position on all those things and more. Damn, that's gotta suck, lol.
Click to expand...
We are very blessed not to be them...
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Apparently the conservative principles he heard about as a young man have slipped his mind.
Click to expand...
True. Additionally, he often claims to be up on current events, but is proving he has a very selective memory on current events. Him not knowing who Juan Hernandez is and how it relates to Trump's War on Drugs being the most recent example.
 
I think the most 1984ish word now is narco-terrorist....... Gonna save millions now taking down the drug dictator. When anyone with three brain cells knows its all about oil........and if we could follow the $$$ you can bet your ass the trump cartel will be getting a nice chunk of that.....
When will the Trump cult finally realize we are watching the greatest grift in American history actually in the WHite House......
 
stephenPE said:
I think the most 1984ish word now is narco-terrorist....... Gonna save millions now taking down the drug dictator. When anyone with three brain cells knows its all about oil........and if we could follow the $$$ you can bet your ass the trump cartel will be getting a nice chunk of that.....
When will the Trump cult finally realize we are watching the greatest grift in American history actually in the WHite House......
Click to expand...
The oil and an Epstein Files. It's a Trump Twofer. :thup:
 
stephenPE said:
I think the most 1984ish word now is narco-terrorist....... Gonna save millions now taking down the drug dictator. When anyone with three brain cells knows its no about oil........and if we could follow the $$$ you can bet your ass the Venezuelan people will be getting a nice chunk of that.....
When will the Trump detractors finally realize we are watching the greatest gift in American history actually in the WHite House......
Click to expand...
FIFY (y)
 
Tobytone said:
Chives is clearly delusional, a perfect example of the kind of brain that's been running things. Can you imagine? I was just thinking about how lucky we are on the right. I think we take it for granted just how often we end up on the right side of history. Does that require being brilliant strategists or taking risks on dicey choices that could go either way? Nah, it's dead simple. How many genders are there? Two. A person born with a penis is a man, a person born with a vagina is a woman. A guy shooting a CEO in cold blood is a bad thing. Being shot dead for your speech isn't the same as getting booted because you suck at your job. Violent criminals shouldn't be released back onto the streets at all, let alone without bail. Sanctuary cities are illegal. Indicted narco-terrorists should be arrested, etc.

Now imagine being a dipshit like this and taking the opposite position on all those things and more. Damn, that's gotta suck, lol.
Click to expand...
Invective and stuck in the 1950s.
 
Tobytone said:
Ok Jakey, I'll do this just for you. Focus and read this a couple of times to let it sink in. I'm going to pretend I'm explaining it to my 5 year old nephew:

We sent our police soldiers to Venezuela to catch a bad guy named Maduro, like when cops arrest a criminal who sells really bad drugs that hurt people here.

He had a big warrant for being a super bad drug boss, so we grabbed him and brought him here for a fair trial in court.

It's not like starting a big war because we're just doing police work to stop a dangerous crook, not fighting the whole country.
Click to expand...
Our soldiers are not police. We are not the world's police. We had no authority. Thank you for trying to make an argument. Nice change.
 
Jake Starkey said:
Invective and stuck in the 1950s.
Click to expand...
I think it might be time for you to stretch out a bit and try a new word of the month, 'invective' is really getting worn out. I've got to believe you're capable of learning a new word at least once a month. Just trying to help, as usual.
 
Jake Starkey said:
Our soldiers are not police. We are not the world's police. We had no authority. Thank you for trying to make an argument. Nice change.
Click to expand...
Oh, I see. If I talk to you like you're 5 years old, you can detect the argument. I'll try again.

When really bad guys live in foreign countries with lots of bad guys with scary guns guarding him, the President of the United States, the top cop in the country and the world often using soldiers to arrest the really bad guy. He has the power to do so because he is the Commander in Chief. That means he's the really big boss of all the soldiers. Now Jakey, say thank you to your President for arresting a guy that has killed many innocent people and now the many surviving victims will finally get to see him receive justice. So that means Jakey, the good guys won. All of the good people of Venezuela get to live happy for ever and ever.

I hope that helped.
 
Tobytone said:
I think it might be time for you to stretch out a bit and try a new word of the month, 'invective' is really getting worn out. I've got to believe you're capable of learning a new word at least once a month. Just trying to help, as usual.
Click to expand...
It means in application you have no logic or sensibility in your rebuttal, only name calling, etc. :)
 
Tobytone said:
Oh, I see. If I talk to you like you're 5 years old, you can detect the argument. I'll try again.

When really bad guys live in foreign countries with lots of bad guys with scary guns guarding him, the President of the United States, the top cop in the country and the world often using soldiers to arrest the really bad guy. He has the power to do so because he is the Commander in Chief. That means he's the really big boss of all the soldiers. Now Jakey, say thank you to your President for arresting a guy that has killed many innocent people and now the many surviving victims will finally get to see him receive justice. So that means Jakey, the good guys won. All of the good people of Venezuela get to live happy for ever and ever.

I hope that helped.
Click to expand...
Invective again instead of rebuttal. You are a laughing stock. :)
 
Sailor said:
Taking it easy on him. I am certain he is right up to date with all the pronouns and inclusive language.....
Click to expand...
I suppose, I really shouldn't discourage progress. The 'invective' word was something he dug out a month ago when I was poking fun at his comment because it looked like a 12-year-old wrote it. The new word was a big swing for Jakey, and he's been practicing applying his scary new venture into three syllable words, with various levels of success, lol. You're right, I should take it easy on him. Bless his heart,
 
Jake Starkey said:
It means in application you have no logic or sensibility in your rebuttal, only name calling, etc. :)
Click to expand...
LOL, thanks for the clarification, I'll stand on my record of supplying plenty of supporting evidence and I explain my logic in detail on the regular. I think you should work on that one Jakey. What part of my comment are you struggling with? I've tried to break things down into small and simple bites for you, is that not working? If not, tell me what you need me to explain with more facts and logic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top