“Trump makes moves to expand his power”

archives

Verified User
“The new administration’s most provocative move came this week, as it announced it would temporarily halt federal payments. The technical-sounding directive had enormous immediate impact potentially pulling trillions of dollars from police departments, domestic violence shelters, nutrition services and disaster relief programs that rely on federal grants.”

“Though the Republican administration denied Medicaid was affected, it acknowledged the online portal allowing states to file for reimbursement from the program was shut down for part of Tuesday in what it insisted was an error.”

“Legal experts noted the president is explicitly forbidden from cutting off spending for programs that Congress has approved. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to appropriate money and requires the executive to pay it out. A 50-year-old law known as the Impoundment Control Act makes that explicit by prohibiting the president from halting payments on grants or other programs approved by Congress.”

“The proposed halt on grants comes after Trump, who during the campaign pledged to be “a dictator on day one,” has taken a number of provocative moves to challenge legal constraints on his power. He fired the inspectors general of his Cabinet agencies without giving Congress the warning required by law, declared that there is an immigrant “invasion” despite low numbers of border crossings, is requiring loyalty pledges from new hires, challenged the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship and is moving career staff out of key positions at the Department of Justice to ensure his loyalists control investigations and prosecutions.”



Comedy here is that the one entity that Trump is shifting on is his own GOP Congress, in effect, making them irrelevant, and all these supposed lovers of the Constitution can’t kiss his ass fast enough to help him

And the right said the Democrats were grandstanding when they portrayed Trump as a threat to out democracy
 
I actually approve of this. People should see, hear, and feel the pain of lost federal money so that they can finally reduce the size, scope, and power of the federal government and return those powers, and dollars, back to their states where it belongs
 
I actually approve of this. People should see, hear, and feel the pain of lost federal money so that they can finally reduce the size, scope, and power of the federal government and return those powers, and dollars, back to their states where it belongs
First off, most southern Red States rely on that Federal assistance, but more so, it isn’t Trump’s decision, Congress, according to the Founders, controls the purse strings, and if they pass law establishing Federal Aid programs, the President’s duty is to enforce that law, not amend it
 
First off, most southern Red States rely on that Federal assistance, but more so, it isn’t Trump’s decision, Congress, according to the Founders, controls the purse strings, and if they pass law establishing Federal Aid programs, the President’s duty is to enforce that law, not amend it

How's that working so far, Anchovies?
 
“The new administration’s most provocative move came this week, as it announced it would temporarily halt federal payments. The technical-sounding directive had enormous immediate impact potentially pulling trillions of dollars from police departments, domestic violence shelters, nutrition services and disaster relief programs that rely on federal grants.”

“Though the Republican administration denied Medicaid was affected, it acknowledged the online portal allowing states to file for reimbursement from the program was shut down for part of Tuesday in what it insisted was an error.”

“Legal experts noted the president is explicitly forbidden from cutting off spending for programs that Congress has approved. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to appropriate money and requires the executive to pay it out. A 50-year-old law known as the Impoundment Control Act makes that explicit by prohibiting the president from halting payments on grants or other programs approved by Congress.”

“The proposed halt on grants comes after Trump, who during the campaign pledged to be “a dictator on day one,” has taken a number of provocative moves to challenge legal constraints on his power. He fired the inspectors general of his Cabinet agencies without giving Congress the warning required by law, declared that there is an immigrant “invasion” despite low numbers of border crossings, is requiring loyalty pledges from new hires, challenged the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship and is moving career staff out of key positions at the Department of Justice to ensure his loyalists control investigations and prosecutions.”



Comedy here is that the one entity that Trump is shifting on is his own GOP Congress, in effect, making them irrelevant, and all these supposed lovers of the Constitution can’t kiss his ass fast enough to help him

And the right said the Democrats were grandstanding when they portrayed Trump as a threat to out democracy
trump cannot stop payments that were allocated by Congress.
 
I actually approve of this. People should see, hear, and feel the pain of lost federal money so that they can finally reduce the size, scope, and power of the federal government and return those powers, and dollars, back to their states where it belongs
Of all the stupid shit you post, this one is probably the stupidest. In order to realize how important the Fed. govt. is you have to kill it.

Genius.

I do agree that Musk should stop getting billions for his space toys, and Bezos should not get tax refunds. But what you offered is just nonsense.
 
Fascist 34X felon Trump temporarily attempted to pause federal payments, but this action was blocked by a federal judge.

Here's a detailed account based on the information available:

  • Initial Directive: Fascist 34X felon Trump's administration directed a pause on all federal grants and loans, aiming to conduct a review to ensure spending aligned with his policy goals. This directive was set to take effect at 5 p.m. ET on January 28, 2025. The move was part of broader executive actions to reassess federal spending, particularly targeting programs related to diversity, equity, inclusion, foreign aid, and environmental policies.
  • Judicial Intervention: However, before the pause could fully take effect, U.S. District Judge Loren L. AliKhan issued an administrative stay, temporarily blocking this directive. This stay was to prevent the immediate implementation of the pause on existing federal grant programs until at least Monday, February 3, 2025, with a court hearing scheduled to revisit the issue.
  • On January 29, 2025, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rescinded the memo that had called for this pause, although the White House clarified that this did not mean the underlying executive orders on funding reviews were rescinded. However, the broader intent to review federal spending according to Fascist 34X felon Trump's policy priorities continued.
    https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/re...orary-pause-most-federal-financial-assistance

@Grok
 
Do they? Which red states "certainly like it"?
Of the 32 states which receive more than they contribute, 27 states (84%) are REPUBLICAN. Of the 18 states which contribute more than they receive, 14 states (78%) are DEMOCRATIC."
Fascist 34X felon Trump temporarily attempted to pause federal payments, but this action was blocked by a federal judge.

Here's a detailed account based on the information available:

  • Initial Directive: Fascist 34X felon Trump's administration directed a pause on all federal grants and loans, aiming to conduct a review to ensure spending aligned with his policy goals. This directive was set to take effect at 5 p.m. ET on January 28, 2025. The move was part of broader executive actions to reassess federal spending, particularly targeting programs related to diversity, equity, inclusion, foreign aid, and environmental policies.
  • Judicial Intervention: However, before the pause could fully take effect, U.S. District Judge Loren L. AliKhan issued an administrative stay, temporarily blocking this directive. This stay was to prevent the immediate implementation of the pause on existing federal grant programs until at least Monday, February 3, 2025, with a court hearing scheduled to revisit the issue.
  • On January 29, 2025, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rescinded the memo that had called for this pause, although the White House clarified that this did not mean the underlying executive orders on funding reviews were rescinded. However, the broader intent to review federal spending according to Fascist 34X felon Trump's policy priorities continued.
    https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/re...orary-pause-most-federal-financial-assistance
@Grok
“copy and paste” thinks everything he sees on Twitter is true, tough to say if it is hilarious or sad
 
Irony is that Trump just rescinded his cutting of Federal funding, like most of his decisions, was ill thought and inane
trump is a buffoon who finished in the bottom of his class at Wharton. After daddy bought him those grades. He doesn't have the mental capacity to fully understand the complexities of the office. He just loves to see himself every night as he dominates the news cycles.
 
Of the 32 states which receive more than they contribute, 27 states (84%) are REPUBLICAN. Of the 18 states which contribute more than they receive, 14 states (78%) are DEMOCRATIC."

I didn't expect you to be able to name the red states that supposedly "certainly like it", Anchovies, and you can't.

Poor Anchovies,

“copy and paste” thinks everything he sees on Twitter is true

Did I say that, Anchovies?
 
trump is a buffoon who finished in the bottom of his class at Wharton. After daddy bought him those grades. He doesn't have the mental capacity to fully understand the complexities of the office. He just loves to see himself every night as he dominates the news cycles.


Is that so?
 
First off, most southern Red States rely on that Federal assistance, but more so, it isn’t Trump’s decision, Congress, according to the Founders, controls the purse strings, and if they pass law establishing Federal Aid programs, the President’s duty is to enforce that law, not amend it
and here's the problem with this, congress holds the purse strings, but if they designate a portion of that to discretionary spending with the expectation that the executive is going to spend those funds in an unspoken way..............they can't bitch about it because they didn't actually do their job correctly.
 
Back
Top