tRump refuses to denounce White Supremecy groups during debate.

Yeah. He's dark-skinned. And?

From Wikipedia:

The group believes men—especially white men—and Western culture are under siege; their views have elements of the white genocide conspiracy theory.[22][23][24] Officially, the group rejects white supremacy, although members have participated in multiple racist events and events centered around anti-left violence, with a former member organizing the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville.

wikipedia. :rofl2:

fucking shit stains

you think a real white supramacist group like the KKK would have a black man as the leader?
 
wikipedia. :rofl2:

fucking shit stains

you think a real white supramacist group like the KKK would have a black man as the leader?

Unlike you, I had no knowledge of the Proud Boys until Trump's bizarre comment. But I've read some about them. For the most part, its members are violent white supremacists. Its members seem excited about Trump's comment, too.

If Trump's comment didn't mean what we all think it means, then what did he mean by it? Interpret it for us.
 
Unlike you, I had no knowledge of the Proud Boys until Trump's bizarre comment. But I've read some about them. For the most part, its members are violent white supremacists. Its members seem excited about Trump's comment, too.

If Trump's comment didn't mean what we all think it means, then what did he mean by it? Interpret it for us.

for the most part, you are a shit stain moron

it doesn't surprise me you have not heard of them. you seem to be generally ignorant of things in the news of late.
 
Yeah. He's dark-skinned. And?

From Wikipedia:

The group believes men—especially white men—and Western culture are under siege; their views have elements of the white genocide conspiracy theory.[22][23][24] Officially, the group rejects white supremacy, although members have participated in multiple racist events and events centered around anti-left violence, with a former member organizing the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville.

I read this twice before concluding it is a complete logical fallacy.

"...their views have elements of the white genocide conspiracy theory" This is an affirming the consequent fallacy. What it does is looks at the group's views and then without qualification assigns those views to be part and parcel of "white genocide conspiracy theory." It's likely also a fallacy of composition, fallacy of false attribution (eg., quoting out of context), among other problematic issues with it.

That the next sentence contradicts directly the previous is a No True Scotsman.

This is then followed by using guilt by association as the example of supposed involvement in "racist events" cites activities by a "former" member of the group.

Whatever my or your personal views on this group are, is irrelevant here. The citation from Wiki is simply wrong on its face as it doesn't cite evidence but rather relies on ignoring the logical problems with the statement.
 
Back
Top