"Trump says there should be no Mueller report"

Bingo.

And omg. It is not Trump’s job to prove that he’s innocent. It’s Mullet’s job to prove that Trump commited a crime and if Barr has nothing to report, then we can all know no crime was committed.

Not quite, that would prove there was not enough evidence.. Not enough evidence is just that.........

Most of you don't don't care if he committed crimes, lied, stole, cheated etc nor if he continues to do so while acting as potus.... The ends justify the means when he's your guy...... just sayin
 
this has got to be the most sordid tale in our history. I never would have thought just how deranged the Deep State
could be - i mean I've always known about their Russiaphobia...but wow,,they attempted a coup :eek2:

:rolleyes: I & others here have known you a long while.. Perhaps some of them recall you talking about "the deep state or Russiaphobia", I most certainly can't..

NOT ONCE!!!!! Not @ Bill Maher, nor any of those that came after such as RV, PG, DCJ etc
 
You're such a clueless dumbfuck you can't even get the link right.

Page not found
Published 5:03 PM ET Thu, 2 Aug 2012 Updated 12:57 PM ET Fri, 8 July 2016 CNBC.com
We're sorry, the page you were looking for isn't found here.

Arsecheese is a total moron, with absolutely no redeeming features.
 
I suppose Mason could list all the things that have been found regarding Trump and Russian collusion....on the other hand, since I don't read his posts it would probably be a waste of time.....
 
Its a simple thing......If nothing "incriminating" is found …..Mr. Trump has the right to deny public disclosure. Congress can vote to hell and back.....Congress has no legal authority to demand full disclosure.

Even the POTUS has his/her constitutional rights contained within the Bill of Rights. If the DOJ cannot make a legal effort to get Mueller to "disclose"...….Congress can? LMAO

Judicial watch sued in an attempt to obtain disclosure.

The entire thing is nothing but a SOAP OPERA produced by the dog and phony show that is the DNC and the Media. All MOUTH....NO ASS.

And after all that you never addressed the simple question, if he is as innocent as he endlessly claims, why wouldn't he want the full results released to prove his innocence?

Want to try again?
 
"President Donald Trump said Friday that “there should be no” report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation."

"His comments come a day after the House unanimously passed a symbolic resolution calling for public release of the report Mueller gives to the Justice Department about his probe. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to bring the measure up in his chamber on Thursday, but Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked it."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/tru...be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?

Why would his house Senator Graham go out of his way to insure that the very vehicle proving Trump innocent be kept from public view?

Doesn't seem to make sense, unless ....

He's right. If there's no criminality found, why should there be a political report? That is akin to defamation.
 
He's right. If there's no criminality found, why should there be a political report? That is akin to defamation.

No, Mueller's primarily task as assigned by Trump's own Justice Dept was to investigate Russian influence in the election, this alone merits that the full report be released so the American public can see what Mueller found

Secondly, as I have had to repeat a number of times since no one here will address the question, if Trump is as innocent as he endlessly claims why wouldn't he release the report to prove beyond a doubt that he is fully innocent?

Want to try again?
 
No, Mueller's primarily task as assigned by Trump's own Justice Dept was to investigate Russian influence in the election, this alone merits that the full report be released so the American public can see what Mueller found

Secondly, as I have had to repeat a number of times since no one here will address the question, if Trump is as innocent as he endlessly claims why wouldn't he release the report to prove beyond a doubt that he is fully innocent?

Want to try again?

Bullshit, his primary task was to investigate Trump/Russia collusion. If there is none, there should be no political report. But I'm not at all surprised you would support Soviet style police state tactics.
 
Hello archives,

"President Donald Trump said Friday that “there should be no” report from special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation."

"His comments come a day after the House unanimously passed a symbolic resolution calling for public release of the report Mueller gives to the Justice Department about his probe. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., tried to bring the measure up in his chamber on Thursday, but Trump ally Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked it."

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/tru...be-no-robert-mueller-russia-probe-report.html

Now would an individual who for two years straight has been telling anyone who will listen that he is totally innocent of anything today want to ban the very evidence that according to his logic will prove he is innocent?

Why would his house Senator Graham go out of his way to insure that the very vehicle proving Trump innocent be kept from public view?

Doesn't seem to make sense, unless ....

Then why didn't he fire Muller a long time ago?

Because where there is smoke there is fire?

What ever happened to the Trump who was cooperating with Mueller?

President Trump Says He Supports 'Cooperative' Approach to Mueller Investigation
 
Wait, you believe a fake document used to spy on American citizens is not important? Oy vey.

I give up, no matter how many times you supply the actual FISA applications, the primary soirce, you people still return with the Sean Hannity narrative

Last time, below is the actual application, read it, you'll find the dossier plays at best a lesser role, I can't do anything with those that turn their back on the facts to buy and regurgitate TV innuendo

https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-justice-department-releases-carter-page-fisa-application
 
Bullshit, his primary task was to investigate Trump/Russia collusion. If there is none, there should be no political report. But I'm not at all surprised you would support Soviet style police state tactics.

Again, you are incorrect, read the authorizing memo below, his assigned ask was to investigate Russian involvement in the election, read primary sources before you formulate an opinion or buy the narratives of others

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html
 
"Bullshit" or not, it is not as important to anything near what the Trumpkins make it out to be

It was you democrats making a huge deal of it. So were so many threads about it. All over the news... It was also the main basis for the FISA warrant. So stop being dishonest and saying it is republicans.
 
There should be no Mueller report. There should be no house investigations, There should be no news stations that do not back Trump 100 percent. There should be newspapers that only back Trump. That is what he wants.
 
It was you democrats making a huge deal of it. So were so many threads about it. All over the news... It was also the main basis for the FISA warrant. So stop being dishonest and saying it is republicans.

That is a right wing belief. No, the dossier was not what made the FISA warrant. They are far more complicated than that and had lots of other sources backing it. The dossier is factual.
 
Back
Top