Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
By NATASHA BERTRAND
10/19/2020
An old bullshit story from a biased source
so 50 spooks didn't say the laptop was russian disinfo?
what's your point exactly?
are you retarded?
By NATASHA BERTRAND
10/19/2020
An old bullshit story from a biased source
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden_laptop_controversy
Two forensic analysts who independently examined the data for The Washington Post[4] authenticated 1,828 and 22,000 emails, respectively, of the almost 129,000 emails on the hard drive in 2022. Neither analyst could verify the vast majority of the data, nor could they find clear evidence of tampering but they note "key pieces of evidence useful in discovering tampering were not available." In some cases, The Post matched content to other sources "that the experts were not able to assess". The unverifiable emails included some prominently reported previously by other news outlets. The analysis found that people other than Hunter Biden had created six new folders on the drive over a week after the original report by the New York Post and months after the laptop had been taken into FBI custody. It also found that data had been accessed and copied off the drive by people other than Hunter Biden over the course of nearly three years.[4]
Thankfully, even staunch Republican women are pro choice.That might change to 70% in November. LOL
Thankfully, even staunch Republican women are pro choice.
It will be an interesting election. A litmus test on how many Americans support our Constitution, individual rights and the morality to support democracy over autocracy.
That's assuming key states will truly represent the will of the people. There's a lot of hanky panky going on with staffing polling places, redistricting, and electors.It will be an interesting election. A litmus test on how many Americans support our Constitution, individual rights and the morality to support democracy over autocracy.
One doesn't need to support a very poorly written constitution to be on the moral high ground.
It's totally moral to seek to radically alter the constitution by means provided by the current constitution.
That's assuming key states will truly represent the will of the people. There's a lot of hanky panky going on with staffing polling places, redistricting, and electors.
Which is exactly what's happened over the past few centuries of its existence. You are starting to sound like the white nationalist MAGAts who dislike the results of our republic so much they want to burn it down and start from scratch.
MAGAts exist as a strong political force precisely because of our constitution and the form of government it created.
Trump has no chance to win the popular vote, but thanks to our constitution, he has an excellent chance of regaining the oval office.
If MAGAts and I both dislike the results of our constitution, that creates no associative dynamic between us.
We dislike totally different things for totally different reason.
I like the sentiments of the preamble and the earnest if poorly worded attempts of the amendments to protect our rights.
I fucking HATE the ludicrously inefficient form of government that the founders pulled out of their asses.
More modern democracies in the free world make it look like the shit show that it is.
What's more, we've discussed this more than enough for you to know my stance on the matter.
You compare me with MAGAts not because you have a lucid point to make--you obviously don't--
but merely to provoke. I'm not sure why you do that.
Remember how MAGAts shit their Depends over this?
![]()
Now back to your hypocrisy.![]()
Agreed, just like the American Nazi Party marching in Skokie, the White Supremacist Extremist militias and the Democratic Socialists of America. As long as they don't break the law, they are free to their beliefs.
Malarky, neef. I compare you to the MAGAts because you share a common cause; divide and conquer America by chipping away at our Constitution and advocating segregation.
There's nothing like a mutant with 91 felony indictments taking up the cause of law and order.
Trumpanzees are completely insane.
There's NO lucid argument to be made against that.
I know, right?......this is real humor.....
![]()
but you're fine with 51 intelligence agents signing a falsehood that hunters laptop was "Russian propaganda".
get off your high horse, moral failure.
More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say
More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president’s son.
Hunter Biden.
More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden, pictured here, “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” | Handout/DNCC via Getty Images
By NATASHA BERTRAND
10/19/2020 10:30 PM EDT
More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276
but you're fine with 51 intelligence agents signing a falsehood that hunters laptop was "Russian propaganda".
get off your high horse, moral failure.
Even the left and certainly Biden thought that was disgusting while Trump thought the portrayal of Biden bound in the truck was cool. It is just the sort of disgusting piece of shit the guy is.
I'd say if 51 intelligence agents said it was bullshit that it was bullshit. Just how the fuck would a partisan shithead like you know anything about that laptop and what was on it? Not to mention who gives a flyin fuck, is Hunter running for president? And just what the fuck does that have to do with your fuhrer endorsing a disgusting image of our president bound in the back of a truck? It is not that it is simply disgusting, it's that your fucking hero endorses it while you try and change the subject because you have no excuse for his disgusting behaviour.