Tbird19482
Verified User
So you back a possible Traitor Nice to know.You asked how you can know "FOR SURE" what transpired in a secret meeting in which you did not participate.
You can't. It's the purpose of secret meetings. Let me know when you grasp this.
You can be "FOR SURE" that information was exchanged at the secret meeting.
You can be "FOR SURE" that the Constitution establishes the President as the determinant of what information is "secret" and what is not.
You can be "FOR SURE" that the Constitution does not use the Marxist "we" and "our" with respect to information that is somehow controlled by the government but not by the President.
You aren't likely to impress people by insisting that you are deliberately unwilling to learn from people who know so much more than you.
Then it wouldn't be a secret "behind closed doors" meeting of the intended participants.
Exactly. Not ANYBODY else. How is it you aren't grasping this?
No, we absolutely don't know this.
You can be "FOR SURE" that the Constitution establishes that the President can absolutely "get away with it."
This is an urban legend and you are gullible.
You can cry Diplomacy all you want ,
Why didn't he want any other AMERICAN in the room?
You won't answer that question because you back that POS Traitor.