Trump-Stormy Daniels settlement at heart of potential NY DA indictment didn't violate

floridafan said:
And campaign finance violations. The same violations that most likely Trump will be indicted for.
Click to expand...
Hillary got an $8K fine for listing 1 million she spent on opposition as a "legal expense". The FEC investigated Trump 130K hush money NDA payment and found it to be legal. If an expense has a personal purpose and a campaign purpose you don't need to list it. Trump would have made the payment anyway to prevent Melania from finding out.and to prevent damaging his brand name. So the contribution is legal.
 
ExpressLane said:
Hillary got an $8K fine for listing 1 million she spent on opposition as a "legal expense". The FEC investigated Trump 130K hush money NDA payment and found it to be legal. If an expense has a personal purpose and a campaign purpose you don't need to list it. Trump would have made the payment anyway to prevent Melania from finding out.and to prevent damaging his brand name. So the contribution is legal.
Click to expand...

Nope. It was a campaign expense that he covered up and lied about. Cohen did the job and got 3 years and about a million in fines. It is simple, Cohen did what trump wanted and it is illegal. Trump should in no way escape. It was his entire idea. He was the only one whom Cohen's actions could have helped.
 
ExpressLane said:
Hillary got an $8K fine for listing 1 million she spent on opposition as a "legal expense". The FEC investigated Trump 130K hush money NDA payment and found it to be legal. If an expense has a personal purpose and a campaign purpose you don't need to list it. Trump would have made the payment anyway to prevent Melania from finding out.and to prevent damaging his brand name. So the contribution is legal.
Click to expand...

"The FEC investigated Trump 130K hush money NDA payment and found it to be legal."

Another of your never ending lies.
 
67481ac36b4c5309537c16adfc755d2d3b32071e836f18cc5140fa96b3d789e5-jpg.1233538
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I've never heard anyone mention retainer......I've heard he was billed for attorney fees and costs.......that's something I do weekly.....
Click to expand...

If you never heard anyone mention it then you haven't been paying attention.

Executives of the Company also determined that the $420,000 would be paid to COHEN in monthly amounts of $35,000 over the course of 12 months, and that COHEN should send invoices for these payments.
[snip]
Throughout 2017, COHEN sent to one or more representatives of the Company monthly invoices, which stated, “Pursuant to the retainer agreement, kindly remit payment for services rendered for” the relevant month in 2017, and sought $35,000 per month. The Company accounted for these payments as legal expenses. In truth and in fact, there was no such retainer agreement, and the monthly invoices COHEN submitted were not in connection with any legal services he had provided in 2017.
Click to expand...
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p...ral-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax

So do you normally misrepresent the services you provide to clients on an invoice you present to them?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
If you never heard anyone mention it then you haven't been paying attention.


https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p...ral-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax

So do you normally misrepresent the services you provide to clients on an invoice you present to them?
Click to expand...

good lord, you people are stupid.....that isn't someone claiming this fee was a retainer, that was someone saying the retainer agreement dictated how invoices were to be paid.....

no, I don't misrepresent the services I provide to my clients on my invoices.....I also don't misrepresent facts in my posts on political boards like you just did......cope......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
good lord, you people are stupid.....that isn't someone claiming this fee was a retainer, that was someone saying the retainer agreement dictated how invoices were to be paid.....

no, I don't misrepresent the services I provide to my clients on my invoices.....I also don't misrepresent facts in my posts on political boards like you just did......cope......
Click to expand...

Is there anything you wont spin or lie about?
 
ExpressLane said:
Hillary got an $8K fine for listing 1 million she spent on opposition as a "legal expense". The FEC investigated Trump 130K hush money NDA payment and found it to be legal. If an expense has a personal purpose and a campaign purpose you don't need to list it. Trump would have made the payment anyway to prevent Melania from finding out.and to prevent damaging his brand name. So the contribution is legal.
Click to expand...

Indeed.
 
Earl said:
Yes, ambulance chaser, you often lie.
Click to expand...

Listen I am not taking anyone who claims the election was stolen or unconstitutional seriously anymore. You have 0 creditability. You are simply a conspiracy theory nutter.
 
Jarod said:
Listen I am not taking anyone who claims the election was stolen or unconstitutional seriously anymore. You have 0 creditability. You are simply a conspiracy theory nutter.
Click to expand...
Jarol who does the Constitution give the sole authority to make election laws? Truthfulness on your response would be appreciated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top