ExpressLane
Verified User
Yes Jarod sure is a Dumbass. He thinks judges can rewrite laws. And you come by being a dumbass all on your own.ROFLMAO.. Thanks for proving that education doesn't make anyone intelligent.

Yes Jarod sure is a Dumbass. He thinks judges can rewrite laws. And you come by being a dumbass all on your own.ROFLMAO.. Thanks for proving that education doesn't make anyone intelligent.
Add that opinion to the other 2 and you have 3-2 that say no. And you also have a former FEC Chaiman , Brad Smith, that says it wasn't illegal. So that would be 4 -2 that say no.The opinion of one former FEC official is only one opinion.
The FEC itself did not say the action was not illegal but voted 2-2 not to pursue the investigation because of possible statute of limitation issues and it would be redundant because of the previous DOJ investigation.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/05/06/fec-trump-stormy-daniels-cohen/
https://www.lifezette.com/2018/05/porn-star-payment-likely-not-illegal-says-former-fec-chairman/It “really doesn’t matter” if President Donald Trump or his lawyer, Michael Cohen, paid porn star Stormy Daniels $130,000 since there’s a “strong argument” that it wasn’t a campaign expenditure, according to former Federal Election Commission Chairman Bradley Smith.
“I think that there’s a very strong argument that this is not a campaign contribution and not a campaign expenditure,” Smith told Fox News host Laura Ingraham Thursday night on “The Ingraham Angle.”
Brad Smith
I have 11 years of post graduate education. How many do you have?
Former officials can act as if they are actually still in that position?Add that opinion to the other 2 and you have 3-2 that say no. And you also have a former FEC Chaiman , Brad Smith, that says it wasn't illegal. So that would be 4 -2 that say no.
https://www.lifezette.com/2018/05/porn-star-payment-likely-not-illegal-says-former-fec-chairman/
You are going to get your hopes crushed again.
So not illegal. Remember Gary Edwards had a contributor pay $1 million for his pregnant mistress and that was deemed legal. Trump used his own money to conceal an affair from his own family. Totally legal according to former FEC official Von Spakovsky.
"If the state charges are based on a supposed violation of federal campaign finance law, then the Manhattan DA is way off base," Hans von Spakovsky told Fox News Digital.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...ictment-didnt-violate-campaign-law-fec-expert
They change who the legislature said mailout ballots were to be sent out to. How long ballots could be counted and and changed voting hours. All laws that were written by the state legislatures. If they wanted to change those laws the only legal option would be to ask the state legislatures to change them. Then if the legislatures WANTED to it would be up to them to do it. It certainly wasn't Constitutional because nowhere in the Constitution does it give Judges the power to rewrite laws that the legislature wrote. So you had voters in at least four states voting unconstitutionally.Explain to me what it is they did that you believe is writing the law? Then explain to me how that made it an unconstitutional election…. You can’t.
Since you say "It’s a good thing that’s not what he’s likely to be charged with." You must agree that Trump didn't violate a FEC law and any indictment that included it would be faulty.It’s a good thing that’s not what he’s likely to be charged with. When he is charged, the charging document will specify what law they say he broke.
You can’t just say, he generally broke the law, they have to specify what statute, then you’ll be able to see the elements and how they fit the facts.
I am sorry you have no clue what is going on here.......but I don't give a fuck what you pretend is happening.....
there was a negotiated agreement. Cohen paid the consideration and billed it to Trump as client costs. Trump paid the bill. When I invoice clients for fees and costs I pay taxes on the fees. Why would I pay taxes on the costs? They are not my income. It is also not a contribution. The client is paying me back......
I don't have to make up anything. Why do you deny what the court accepted?
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p...ral-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax
They change who the legislature said mailout ballots were to be sent out to. How long ballots could be counted and and changed voting hours. All laws that were written by the state legislatures. If they wanted to change those laws the only legal option would be to ask the state legislatures to change them. Then if the legislatures WANTED to it would be up to them to do it. It certainly wasn't Constitutional because nowhere in the Constitution does it give Judges the power to rewrite laws that the legislature wrote. So you had voters in at least four states voting unconstitutionally.
Since you say "It’s a good thing that’s not what he’s likely to be charged with." You must agree that Trump didn't violate a FEC law and any indictment that included it would be faulty.
So not illegal. Remember Gary Edwards had a contributor pay $1 million for his pregnant mistress and that was deemed legal. Trump used his own money to conceal an affair from his own family. Totally legal according to former FEC official Von Spakovsky.
"If the state charges are based on a supposed violation of federal campaign finance law, then the Manhattan DA is way off base," Hans von Spakovsky told Fox News Digital.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...ictment-didnt-violate-campaign-law-fec-expert
NO lawyer, NONE, other than maybe you, would pay on your clients behalf from your personal funds, $150K or any amount, and then bill them $150K for legal services to get it back.
You say that generally, what specific law did they change?
that is all good stuff but quoting legal stuff to PostModernProphet is like talking Math and Logic to Marjorie Greene.
No chance he can grasp any of that and thus you will get a flailing reply.
I don't have to make up anything. Why do you deny what the court accepted?
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/p...ral-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax
it varied from state to state......in Wisconsin, for example, it was unsupervised drop boxes......but then, you already knew that......
Since you say "It’s a good thing that’s not what he’s likely to be charged with." You must agree that Trump didn't violate a FEC law and any indictment that included it would be faulty.
They change who the legislature said mailout ballots were to be sent out to. How long ballots could be counted and and changed voting hours. All laws that were written by the state legislatures. If they wanted to change those laws the only legal option would be to ask the state legislatures to change them. Then if the legislatures WANTED to it would be up to them to do it. It certainly wasn't Constitutional because nowhere in the Constitution does it give Judges the power to rewrite laws that the legislature wrote. So you had voters in at least four states voting unconstitutionally.
The law on how Mail outballots would be distributed and how long they would be accepted and counted. If hey makes them out to everyone on the voter rolls even if people had moved and they counted in them for several days after the election was overWhat law did they change?