floridafan
Verified User
Judges have no say. No judge has authority to certify any election.
How do you begin to prove election fraud without submitting evidence to a court of law.
Judges have no say. No judge has authority to certify any election.
No. He was never convicted of anything.
Quite soon? Really? hahahahaha
0 evidence. You are delusional.
Delusional and stupid. A perfect Trump chump.
Both you and Jarod seem to think you childish insults make some kind of difference.
Agree. At this point, Garland's reluctance is harming our democracy.
You cant just say that evidence exists without proving it. Your proof is???
How do you begin to prove election fraud without submitting evidence to a court of law.
There is no democracy and you don't want a democracy. Stop making shit up.
Evidence does not require a court to exist. RQAA.
There were over 60 legal challenges to this election and everyone was dismissed in court.
No need to even cover this again and again since the plot to call the election illegal was hatch well before the first vote was ever cast.
How do you begin to prove election fraud without submitting evidence to a court of law.
So what! Doesn't mean he didn't commit a crime.
Evidence does not require a court to exist. RQAA.
RQAA.
Illiteracy: Questions end with a question mark.
Logic errors: Repetition (chanting).
^^^^^^^^^^
Rectal cranial inversion
I hope Mr. Kirschner is right, that state case against Trump in Georgia looks good and as far as the federal case against Trump, it's better for Garland to charge Trump and lose than to do nothing at all?!! I think there is plenty to charge Trump for his role in the Jan 6th insurrection, like sedition conspiracy?!!