Trump wins first step.....

archives said:
What the Court ordered was “that the state may not count ballots where the voters needed to provide proof of identification and failed to do so by Nov. 9,” meaning those casting provisional ballots on Election Day who didn’t have ID and were given a time period to produce identification for the ballot to counted, minimal number of ballots

Has nothing to do with those ballots received after Election Day, which there are only ten thousand votes, few to many to change the election (https://www.inquirer.com/politics/e...-counted-deadline-supreme-court-20201111.html) considering Biden’s lead is over fifty thousand and growing
Click to expand...

sorry, that is not the court decision we are discussing.....
 
The rightys are talking certified. This is not what they have ever done in the past. The states certify at specific dates. Certification is a formality. It does not change the vote.
Once the states have all certified, the right will claim it is not official until the electors vote. That is also a formality. They vote as the state vote dictates. This election is over, just like every single one in the past.
Accept reality kiddies. Trump lost.
 
Nordberg said:
The rightys are talking certified. This is not what they have ever done in the past. The states certify at specific dates. Certification is a formality. It does not change the vote.
Once the states have all certified, the right will claim it is not official until the electors vote. That is also a formality. They vote as the state vote dictates. This election is over, just like every single one in the past.
Accept reality kiddies. Trump lost.
Click to expand...

you're a moron.
 
floridafan said:
It was such a big first step that the law firm representing him in PA just resigned. You are a fucking moron.
Click to expand...

Post modern FRAUD apparantly did not read the Judge's ruling. It was a small number of votes that may or may not have been counted. In other words "hollow victory" that won't change anything.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Are these the poll watchers that were not allowed in? Do they have x-ray vision? Or are you arguing that Trump has lied to the court about poll watchers not being allowed in?

By the way, the court has already said that ballots received prior to election day can be counted even if they don't have a legible postmark. The court is smart enough to know that something can't be mailed after election day if it was received on or before election day.


Just because there is a media blackout doesn't mean that Trump hasn't already been indicted for election fraud or rape or any other crime someone decides to make up out of thin air. Lack of evidence is not evidence. It only proves that someone is gullible to think that lack of evidence means it exists.

Can you name Hunter's 2 partners that you just claimed are in jail? I am curious how Bobulinski was able to be interviewed by Tucker Carlson if he was in Federal prison.
Click to expand...

Bevan Cooney and Patrick Ho. Their emails cororroborate fraud and bribes for access to office and deals occurred.
 
Matt Dillon said:
Bevan Cooney and Patrick Ho. Their emails cororroborate fraud and bribes for access to office and deals occurred.
Click to expand...

I see. And what was the business each of them shared with Hunter Biden?

Bevan Cooney never sent emails to Hunter Biden which would be odd if they were actually in business together, don't you think? Con artists often claim to be in business or know people even if they don't. It seems that what Cooney was doing.

As for Patrick Ho, I can find no evidence of any business they would have been partners together in. A business name would be great. I bought something from Amazon yesterday. That doesn't make me a partner with Jeff Bezos. What business did Ho and Hunter own together since you claimed they were business partners.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
a PA judge has ruled that PA may not count votes received after the election since neither the executive branch or the courts had the authority to change state statutes controlling elections.......

here is a copy of the court's decision......

http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7739/file-10440.pdf?cb=aa5ec4
Click to expand...

toon-1.png
 
The final count has come in 306 to 232. That is the same as the worst rout in history that Trump claimed over Hillary. That seems fair.
 
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet said:
a PA judge has ruled that PA may not count votes received after the election since neither the executive branch or the courts had the authority to change state statutes controlling elections.......

here is a copy of the court's decision......

http://www.pacourts.us/assets/files/setting-7739/file-10440.pdf?cb=aa5ec4
Click to expand...

Sad, but you are welcome to your big bowl of hope.

How many votes are you "hoping" it will change??

Have those votes actually been "counted" already??

I wonder why trump's lawyers quit there??
 
The fact that PostModernFraud considers this minuscule action a significant court win for tRump tells you all that you need to know. He is simply in denial.
 
Yes, he has been in that state most of the time I have been here....... I think he has a second home there.......:whome: lol

trump may get a few crumbs/wins, he will still lose the election by a MASSIVE LANDSLIDE according to trump himself
 
Bill said:
Yes, he has been in that state most of the time I have been here....... I think he has a second home there.......:whome: lol

trump may get a few crumbs/wins, he will still lose the election by a MASSIVE LANDSLIDE according to trump himself
Click to expand...

These tRump lovers would spend 50 bucks to save 10. Madoff would simply love this group of gullibles.....lol
 
Last edited:
Matt Dillon said:
There are sworn affidavits to that effect from multiple poll watchers.

Just because there's a media blackout doesn't mean things aren't in the works.

No MSM covered Hunter Biden's laptop and his partners' (plural +1) emails, but they have been corroborated.

2 are already in Federal prison.
Click to expand...

False.
 
Tacomaman said:
Under cross examination, these witness are now changing their story.......lol
Click to expand...

Yep........ I read about those that did not bother to do the orientation before & the judge said if they had done so most of the crying & ignorance wouldn't have led to court
 
Bill said:
Yep........ I read about those that did not bother to do the orientation before & the judge said if they had done so most of the crying & ignorance wouldn't have led to court
Click to expand...

Exactly. I liken these tRump "witnesses" to people who get rear-ended by a car travelling 2 miles per hour and then claim debilitating whiplash.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top