Trumpism Isn't a Matter of Justice / Injuctice

martin said:
Hillary is your one comparable. She also conceded on national television and it the day after the election.
Click to expand...

They are all comparable.

Hillary went on TV in 2020 and said the election WAS STOLEN.

Abrams NEVER conceded the 2018 election, Gillam claims to this day that Desantis rigged the election.

The ONLY difference is that they are democrats. Trump is a danger to absolute power by the democrat Reich - so you are corrupting our elections to keep him from running.
 
Jarod said:
It does not ever matter how rich a person like Trump is, they are always desperate for more. If not they would have stopped accumulating many years ago.
Click to expand...

Nice
R.1147496c6057e92eb95209eb35fdb148



The FACT - I know you don't deal in facts, but the fact remains that Trump couldn't be bought. The Oligarchy has no leverage with him - so you of the Reich did what you always do, used violence.

Throwing political opponents in prison IS violence. This is all about the ruling global Oligarch making clear that resistance is futile, they rule absolutely.

What is the democrat dream?

"The ruling party is the party of the childless, the unmarried, the people working for low wages for large corporations and living in tiny apartments in overcrowded cities that are rife with crime." - Tucker Carlson.

What Trump did was pull the mask off, he showed the masses a tiny glimpse of reality. He red pilled us.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
They are all comparable.

Hillary went on TV in 2020 and said the election WAS STOLEN.

Abrams NEVER conceded the 2018 election, Gillam claims to this day that Desantis rigged the election.

The ONLY difference is that they are democrats. Trump is a danger to absolute power by the democrat Reich - so you are corrupting our elections to keep him from running.
Click to expand...

Hillary expressly conceded the day after the election. Abrams called Kemp and personally conceded to him, then went on television and conceded publicly. Hillary said the good of the country in coming together was more important than her own doubts about the election. Gore said the same thing after he conceded.

Do your homework. With a little effort you may find you can avoid looking entirely like a fool while still being one.
 
Last edited:
martin said:
Hillary expressly conceded the day after the election. Abrams called Kemp and personally conceded to him, then went on television and conceded publicly. Hillary said the good of the country in coming together was more important than her own doubts about the election. Gore said the same thing after he conceded.

Do your homework.
Click to expand...
Hillary Clinton calls Donald Trump an 'illegitimate president'


ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
https://abcnews.go.com › theview › video › hillary-cli...
Oct 2, 2019 — Hillary Clinton calls Donald Trump an 'illegitimate president'. After losing to Trump in the 2016 election, Clinton talks about his conduct ...


Note the date, Oct 2, 2019, three (3) years after Trump was elected.

Poor Marty.

Do your homework, Marty.

Hillary, John Lewis and Jimmy Cahhtah (sic) all called Trump an illegitimate president.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
It does not ever matter how rich a person like Trump is, they are always desperate for more. If not they would have stopped accumulating many years ago.
Click to expand...

Have you stopped accumulating?

What a dishonest hypocrite you are.
 
He is a far lefty who is still accumulating but faults others for accumulating.

He is a far lefty who can’t spell the city where he owns property.

He is morbidly misguided, politically.

A nutter, to be more precise.
 
martin said:
Hillary expressly conceded the day after the election.
Click to expand...

And then reversed her concession.

Abrams called Kemp and personally conceded to him, then went on television and conceded publicly.
Click to expand...

Bunk, you're flat out lying.

{Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams[FONT=cnn_sans_display] defended herself from criticism that she never conceded her loss to Gov. Brian Kemp in 2018 on Friday, addressing what Republicans have already used against her in her newly announced 2022 rematch against Kemp.[/FONT][FONT=cnn_sans_display]Abrams, in the wake of her 2018 loss to Kemp by 1.4 percentage points, acknowledged that Kemp, who then worked as Georgia secretary of state, would be the governor of Georgia. But she specifically said in her final speech that she was not concede due to persistent voter suppression allegations, adding that conceding would mean acknowledging “an action is right, true or proper” and “as a woman of conscience and faith, I cannot concede that.”}

Stacey Abrams defends lack of concession after 2018 gubernatorial loss | CNN Politics

[/FONT]
Hillary said the good of the country in coming together was more important than her own doubts about the election. Gore said the same thing after he conceded.

Do your homework. With a little effort you may find you can avoid looking entirely like a fool while still being one.
Click to expand...

You're just lying. such is the nature of you fascists.

{[FONT=&quot]Hillary Clinton is sticking with her conviction that the 2016 presidential election was not conducted legitimately, saying the details surrounding her loss are still unclear.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]“There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level,” Clinton said during an interview for the latest episode of The Atlantic’s politics podcast, The Ticket. “We still don’t know what really happened.”[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“There’s just a lot that I think will be revealed. History will discover,” the Democratic Party’s 2016 presidential nominee continued. “But you don’t win by 3 million votes and have all this other shenanigans and stuff going on and not come away with an idea like, ‘Whoa, something’s not right here.’ That was a deep sense of unease.”}
Hillary Clinton Maintains 2016 Election ‘Was Not On the Level’: ‘We Still Don’t Know What Really Happened’ (yahoo.com)[/FONT]
 
Mike said:
Love your signature!
You got it down pat!
Click to expand...

Thank You.

You can be sure that it is true because of all the Anti-Truth that is spread around... not just not the truth but the exact opposite of the truth. That rarely happens in the wild, when you see a lot of it like now, and when it is sold so aggressively as it is now, you can be 100% sure that you are the victim of a psychological war operation....that you are being abused.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
And then reversed her concession.



Bunk, you're flat out lying.

{Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams[FONT=cnn_sans_display] defended herself from criticism that she never conceded her loss to Gov. Brian Kemp in 2018 on Friday, addressing what Republicans have already used against her in her newly announced 2022 rematch against Kemp.[/FONT][FONT=cnn_sans_display]Abrams, in the wake of her 2018 loss to Kemp by 1.4 percentage points, acknowledged that Kemp, who then worked as Georgia secretary of state, would be the governor of Georgia. But she specifically said in her final speech that she was not concede due to persistent voter suppression allegations, adding that conceding would mean acknowledging “an action is right, true or proper” and “as a woman of conscience and faith, I cannot concede that.”}

Stacey Abrams defends lack of concession after 2018 gubernatorial loss | CNN Politics

[/FONT]


You're just lying. such is the nature of you fascists.

{[FONT="]Hillary Clinton is sticking with her conviction that the 2016 presidential election was not conducted legitimately, saying the details surrounding her loss are still unclear.[/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#1D2228][FONT="]“There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level,” Clinton
Click to expand...


Ancient history:

https://www.wsj.com/video/stacey-ab...ace/F44780E2-43F6-4C56-AAAE-8316CE4252FA.html

As for Hillary, she maintained her belief the election was "not on the level" but she conceded, she said, in the interest of the nation, which unlike Trump she chose over her personal interest. Some other defeated Presidential candidates from the 18th Century forward have done the same. Only Trump has valued his personal political interest above the country's.

He's fortunate, in a way, that his supporters haven't the sense or the patriotism to see the difference.
 
martin said:
Ancient history:

https://www.wsj.com/video/stacey-ab...ace/F44780E2-43F6-4C56-AAAE-8316CE4252FA.html

As for Hillary, she maintained her belief the election was "not on the level" but she conceded, she said, in the interest of the nation, which unlike Trump she chose over her personal interest. Some other defeated Presidential candidates from the 18th Century forward have done the same. Only Trump has valued his personal political interest above the country's.

He's fortunate, in a way, that his supporters haven't the sense or the patriotism to see the difference.
Click to expand...

Nonsense, Marty.

Hillary Clinton calls Donald Trump an 'illegitimate president'


ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
https://abcnews.go.com › theview › video › hillary-cli...
Oct 2, 2019 — Hillary Clinton calls Donald Trump an 'illegitimate president'. After losing to Trump in the 2016 election, Clinton talks about his conduct ...


Note the date, Oct 2, 2019, three (3) years after Trump was elected.

Poor Marty.

Do your homework, Marty.

Hillary, John Lewis and Jimmy Cahhtah (sic) all called Trump an illegitimate president.
 
Earl said:
Nonsense, Marty.

Hillary Clinton calls Donald Trump an 'illegitimate president'
Click to expand...

She has 1st Amendment rights to do that.
Trump has 1st Amendment rights to say that about Biden.

[I didn't do that, by the way. I called the American electorate a bunch of fucking idiots, which would be impossible to refute.]

What Secretary Clinton didn't do was provoke an insurrection against the government of the United States.

This difference, of course, is too nuanced for Vandy Boy.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
She has 1st Amendment rights to do that.
Trump has 1st Amendment rights to say that about Biden.

[I didn't do that, by the way. I called the American electorate a bunch of fucking idiots, which would be impossible to refute.]

What Secretary Clinton didn't do was provoke an insurrection against the government of the United States.

This difference, of course, is too nuanced for Vandy Boy.
Click to expand...

Trump didn’t provoke an insurrection either.

If you had been educated at a university, you wouldn’t be so ignorant.

If you weren’t so old, you would remember that I educated you yesterday on the term, “Vandy Boys.”

That’s reserved for the superb Vanderbilt baseball team.

Since you may not be among the extant population tomorrow, think about your possible meeting with your hero, Mao. You both will be in the same neighborhood.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
She has 1st Amendment rights to do that.
Trump has 1st Amendment rights to say that about Biden.

[I didn't do that, by the way. I called the American electorate a bunch of fucking idiots, which would be impossible to refute.]

What Secretary Clinton didn't do was provoke an insurrection against the government of the United States.

This difference, of course, is too nuanced for Vandy Boy.
Click to expand...

Very true. Thoughtful of Earl to distinguish himself from Hillary Clinton.
 
martin said:
Very true. Thoughtful of Earl to distinguish himself from Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...

Well, Marty, one thing that we can say with conviction is:

Trump defeated Hillary and Hillary will never, never, never be president.


Reminder: Not one person involved in Jan. 6 riot has been ...

Washington Examiner
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com › opinion › re...
Jan 6, 2022 — One year after the Capitol riot, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection, despite initial Justice Department claims that such ...


Perhaps you and Mao’s admirer (Nifty) won’t keep lying…perhaps not.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top