LOL. The teacher got owned on the first page. 
no.And yet almost every other country in the world says you are wrong.
We can run a list of 1st world countries who allow for very liberal gun access but restrict 'weapons of war' and there citizens do not just find another 'next lethal gun' to commit the same level of atrocities.
We can show, in the US, how as the rights to weapons of war has increased, the number of mass slaughters has risen in lock step.
Hardening targets is a right wing magat myth and would not work. They create a 'fish in a barrel' shooting gallery for any determined shooter as they are so easy to get in to.
Actually it does not protect you FROM THE RESULTS. The speech itself is protected.The 1st amendment isn't an absolute right either. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater.
.
@TOP - The general Trumpper here is passive agressive in debates, and refuses to answer when confronted with their hippocratical answers.
People should not carry guns to protests or schools. -AND- The Second Amendment is absolute.
When asked if it should be illegal to carry guns to public schools or protests, they refuse to answer.

I know...Fake Lawyer is dying for your attention.
That drips with irony.Fake Lawyer is dying for your attention.
The refuge of a coward.
Nice! Yes, my answers are often Hippocratical, because that's how I was taught.
All my classes were taught by the Hippocratic method.
I thought it got monotonous back then, reading it in every psyllabus, however it turned out to be a real blessing.
Add another word the lizard doesn't know the meaning of....That drips with irony.
Children used to armed government men leering at them while they are in public care is how you train children to be government slaves and doesn’t create a good learning experienceBroad, what was George Stephanopoulos sued for?
How does any of that relate to the fact that by stopping teachers from being armed, you are killing innocent children? Why do you want children to die? Just so that you can end civil rights?