TRUMPPERS, this is the question...

archives said:
And a day latter he said:

“Key information on Jeffrey Epstein’s relationships with the rich and powerful is unlikely to be found in grand jury transcripts the White House wants to be unsealed, Alan Dershowitz, Epstein’s former lawyer, said Sunday, that the relevant information is in “sealed records by two or three federal judges in the New York courts.”

“But, “the information that hasn’t been requested is going to be far more informative and far more relevant than the grand jury information,” Dershowitz told Bream. “Grand jury information is narrowly tailored by prosecutors only to provide sufficient evidence to result in an indictment.”

(https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/20/dershowitz-grand-jury-testimony-epstein-answers-00464976)

Meaning, to return to my original post, Bondi saying she’ll release the Grand Jury proceedings is nothing, and apparently you thought it was
Click to expand...
The grand jury transcripts will be released.

If there is key information, it will be revealed.

If he believes there is no incriminating evidence, it would be because there isn’t any incriminating evidence.
 
Earl said:
The grand jury transcripts will be released.

If there is key information, it will be revealed.

If he believes there is no incriminating evidence, it would be because there isn’t any incriminating evidence.
Click to expand...
“earl,” as was explained to you, if anything is actually revealed, it won’t be for months if not longer due to legal hurdles, and, even if it were, it would be so heavily redacted that it will be worthless

And as I noted, which Dershowitz confirmed, that is nothing shattering in those proceedings, anything that is incriminating is locked away

All this promise by Bondi is just an attempt to quite the controversy
 
archives said:
“earl,” as was explained to you, if anything is actually revealed, it won’t be for months if not longer due to legal hurdles, and, even if it were, it would be so heavily redacted that it will be worthless

And as I noted, which Dershowitz confirmed, that is nothing shattering in those proceedings, anything that is incriminating is locked away

All this promise by Bondi is just an attempt to quite the controversy
Click to expand...

“There is no client list’: Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer Alan Dershowitz.​


It’s “quiet” not quite, Anchovies.

Poor Anchovies.
 
Earl said:
These far left loons are salivating over…nada.

A big nothing burger.

Oh, we have him…this time.

Too funny.
Click to expand...
Amazing

It ain’t the “left loons” that created and now are echoing and stirring this controversy, it is MAGA, you been under a rock the last three weeks?

Remember, your Messiah, who at one time promoted the controversy, was going to “drain the swamp,” finally get those elites, and now it appears many in your Red Hat Club feel Trump is part of that swamp and covering up the evidence
 
Earl said:
If the president of the U.S. asks a judge to release the grand jury proceedings, in the interests of transparency, why would he deny it?
Click to expand...
Because other parties who might want the proceedings sealed would sue, and then we have the legal quagmire Trump is planning on
 
archives said:
Amazing

It ain’t the “left loons” that created and now are echoing and stirring this controversy, it is MAGA, you been under a rock the last three weeks?

Remember, your Messiah, who at one time promoted the controversy, was going to “drain the swamp,” finally get those elites, and now it appears many in your Red Hat Club feel Trump is part of that swamp and covering up the evidence
Click to expand...
We love President Trump.

We voted for him to do exactly what he is doing, Anchovies.

Promises made, promises kept.

This keeps escaping the far left loons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top