I agree.
TRUMPPERS, this is the question...
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
A judge has to approve releasing grand jury docs.
QP!
Verified User
Yes.
The one thing he has no power to order the release of and that will take potentially years to go thru the courts, etc and he can blame 'radical judges' when they refuse to release much of it due to Grand Jury secrecy rules, Trump is aware of.
Meanwhile all the 302's and all the information not presented to the Grand Jury, which is the majority of it, which Trump does have the power to release via his DoJ, he is refusing.
QP!
Verified User
Agreed.
Pedophile rings do not have clients... they have co conspirators and collaborators and enablers and those who turn a blind eye.
The officials in the Catholic church during all the young boy rapes were not 'clients', but they were guilty of turning a blind eye, and many of being a collaborator via their knowledge and silence.
That is the proper way to speak of Trump and the other rich men around Epstein, many of which also became victims of epstein too via his blackmail schemes.
Again, what "entire thing"? You said that (paraphrasing here) because he wants to release this thing, that means you THINK there is more over there... What if there is nothing "over there", Jarod? You have no actual evidence than your own supposition. I, however, have seen the distance the left will go to try to "get tRump", and releasing tidbits from Epstein files isn't even a long walk for that kind of thing. If it existed, we'd have seen it.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
you know, the whole enchilada......
You already ate that enchilada, AHZ... you told me you didn't like the cheese.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
things like this are just bad logic.
I told him this yesterday but he has forgotten.
It was better than the logic involved in Jarod's "the fact he wants to release grand jury testimony tells <Jarod> that there is more" over there... <nodding his head in random direction>.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
same stupefyingly bad logic.
this will not cut it damo.
libertarian fence sitter = every banker pedo gets away with it
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
that's bad too.
this is the right wing version of healthcare for all I fear.
something they say every two years that never happens and they never stop talking about.
Any and all documents, Blondi said there is more.
So I will add a precursur to my first question?
If there is no more, why does TACO, 79, not say so? That would help him. This is basic logic.
TACO is self interested, if what they have would clear him, he would say that the Grand Jury stuff is all of it. In fact, releasing the entire file would solve that, because the file would contain all the Grand Jury information plus any additional that exists.
Do you really believe the Grand Jury transcripts would contain the entire FBI file? Are you that naive.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
they have not said one true thing in ten years.
omg.
I hate to say I am getting a "we're nationally fucked" feeling.
I think that many documents still need judicial approval before they can be released. Get on it, counselor.
The only rule I know about, is approval for Grand Jury documents.
If, by some stretch of the imagination, there are others, why does TACO, 79, not say so?
The FBI is free to release anything not top secret, and according to TACO, 79, he can declassify things just by thinking about it.
For a non-trumpper you are really putting a lot into defending his failure to release... TACO, 79 demanded others release the information.
Because he wants you to talk about this for some reason? You are just "guessing" there are more documents you want to see.
I said before that I think he should just release whatever he can and ask for judicial approval for the rest. He's on the judicial approval, it appears we may have seen what he could release without it. Just saying "because he wants to release that thing over there" tells you that there is "more in this imaginary stack I picture in my head" doesn't change the poor logic involved in that supposition.