Trump's attorneys unable to locate sensitive military document he discussed on tape

Walter, it certainly appears that you were wrong...again.

Why does Earl always try to hide the link? Here is what his link actually said:

In the end, the investigators determined the emails were mostly ones they had previously seen and Clinton was ultimately cleared by the FBI two days before the election.

“And so I met with them and they said we found a lot of new stuff,” Comey told Feinstein. “We did not find anything that changes our view of her intent.”
https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/03/poli...-forwarding-classified-information/index.html

So once again, nothing changed, but we did not know that until after the election. That helped trump.
 
Why does Earl always try to hide the link? Here is what his link actually said:


https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/03/poli...-forwarding-classified-information/index.html

So once again, nothing changed, but we did not know that until after the election. That helped trump.

The links are there, Walter.

Are you still drunk?

Comey testified that Hillary had classified information on her private server and Weiner's computer was found to have that same classified information, Walter.

Get a clue.

What FBI Director James Comey Really Said About Hillary ...
Go.com
https://abcnews.go.com › Politics › story
Aug 2, 2016 — Clinton was wrong when she said she never sent or received classified information over the server. "Our investigation found .



Comey says classified Clinton emails forwarded to Anthony ...
CNN.com
https://www.cnn.com › 2017/05/03 › politics › james-co...
May 3, 2017 — FBI Director James Comey revealed Wednesday that Hillary Clinton emails containing classified information were “somehow” being forwarded to


Refute the links, Walter, I’ll wait.
 
You have one link to ABC News' main website, and another to CNN's main website, but I had to actually track down links to the actual stories. Your claims fell apart at that point.

How old are you that you do not know how to copy and paste links?

No, the claims are accurate and news sources often change the links to stories.

I’m surprised that you were able to find the changes, being either drunk or stoned.
 
No, the claims are accurate and news sources often change the links to stories.

You did not provide links to the news stories, and the news stories did not say what you claimed. Both are just proven facts.
 
You did not provide links to the news stories, and the news stories did not say what you claimed. Both are just proven facts.

Yes, they did, Walter.

News sources often change their links.

You have just admitted that you can not refute the contents of the two links, even though you read them.
 
Yes, they did, Walter.

News sources often change their links.

They rarely change the links to their news stories, because if they did, they would mess up the search engines. Even if they did, then you would have provided links to the old news stories. You did not. You provably only provided links to the main pages.
 
They rarely change the links to their news stories, because if they did, they would mess up the search engines. Even if they did, then you would have provided links to the old news stories. You did not. You provably only provided links to the main pages.

Wrong, Walter.

I have reposted dozens of news stories from other forums.

I almost always have to edit them with the change to the link.

I just posted two links that were changed.

Are you drunk?
 
You have one link to ABC News' main website, and another to CNN's main website, but I had to actually track down links to the actual stories. Your claims fell apart at that point.

How old are you that you do not know how to copy and paste links?

Earl's mind isn't what it used to be. To become a USAF Captain requires a bit of moxie including a college degree. Same for being an Air Traffic Controller. None of those qualities can be seen in Earl's behavior or personality.

Ergo, either he's lying or he's suffering some form of mental degradation. I believe he was telling the truth about his former career.
 
Yes, they did, Walter.

News sources often change their links.

You have just admitted that you can not refute the contents of the two links, even though you read them.

To main website, yes, Earl. Walt is correctly stating that you screwed up in posting the links.

Examples: this is a link to a specific story https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/new...tor-over-military-promotion/story?id=99821473

This, like your link, is to the main website that changes daily, if not hourly https://abcnews.go.com/
 
The fact that the whacky right doesn't see that they're supporting a demagogue who has presented the greatest danger to free society in almost 300 years is both tragic and sickening.

Says a person who cannot see that they support a demented basement dweller who collected classified documents at his house like they were his personal library and only gave them back when Trump was caught with some and he thought it would make him "look good" to "voluntarily discover" some illegally gathered classified documents.

Both of the past two Presidents have been horrible choices, and can't seem to stop themselves from collecting information that they should not have. While I agree that Trump is a stumbling child king, I see with my own eyes the utter lunatic professional-level hypocrisy of folks who defend the current dementia patient in chief.

It isn't even that "Biden did it too" so much as "Biden did it for decades and collected far more material that he never gave up until decades later"...

When it comes to classified documents, neither of these men have a moral high ground and pretending that you are "shocked" over one when supporting the other is just hypocrisy. If you care about the one, you should not forgive the other.
 
Says a person who cannot see that they support a demented basement dweller who collected classified documents at his house like they were his personal library and only gave them back when Trump was caught with some and he thought it would make him "look good" to "voluntarily discover" some illegally gathered classified documents.

Both of the past two Presidents have been horrible choices, and can't seem to stop themselves from collecting information that they should not have. While I agree that Trump is a stumbling child king, I see with my own eyes the utter lunatic professional-level hypocrisy of folks who defend the current dementia patient in chief.

It isn't even that "Biden did it too" so much as "Biden did it for decades and collected far more material that he never gave up until decades later"...

When it comes to classified documents, neither of these men have a moral high ground and pretending that you are "shocked" over one when supporting the other is just hypocrisy. If you care about the one, you should not forgive the other.

It's tome to stop your bullshit. Trump purposefully took documents. Trump refused to return them. Trump lied about still having them, and the worst is that he was most likely showing them to other people. Then we can only wonder if he gave some away, or sold some of them.
 
Says a person who cannot see that they support a demented basement dweller who collected classified documents at his house like they were his personal library and only gave them back when Trump was caught with some and he thought it would make him "look good" to "voluntarily discover" some illegally gathered classified documents.

Both of the past two Presidents have been horrible choices, and can't seem to stop themselves from collecting information that they should not have. While I agree that Trump is a stumbling child king, I see with my own eyes the utter lunatic professional-level hypocrisy of folks who defend the current dementia patient in chief.

It isn't even that "Biden did it too" so much as "Biden did it for decades and collected far more material that he never gave up until decades later"...

When it comes to classified documents, neither of these men have a moral high ground and pretending that you are "shocked" over one when supporting the other is just hypocrisy. If you care about the one, you should not forgive the other.

1. I've seen no evidence that Biden stashed more of a quantity of classified material than trump did.

2. I've seen no evidence that any of the documentation Biden collected was classified as "Top Secret".

3. Biden didn't try to withhold the material after it was discovered, or lie and falsely claim he had returned it all.

4. Pence did the same thing as Biden, but I've not seen any trump fan or anyone on the right call Pence out for doing it, or call him "demented".

5. We still don't know if trump endangered America by showing top secret docs to others, but based on the fact they were in his office desk, I would not be surprised.

I'm not suggesting Biden or Pence get a medal for returning government docs, but comparing their situation to what trump did is wrong-headed.

In my opinion, of course.
 
Did Hillary send those documents to herself?

She responded to emails containing them and asked for them. The report indicated that even SCI that was marked as such was stored on the server and that it was certain that the server had been hacked. The handling of Classified information by HillBillary was way worse than some being in Trump's basement, pretty much anyone with more than rudimentary computer knowledge who knew about the server had access to it due to the lax security on it.

Keeping SCI in any form, whether received or sent, and discussing it in any place other than a SCIF or encrypted to be secure for such communication is illegal. I would be in prison still (well, maybe I might be on parole by now) had I done even a portion of what she did with this email server of hers.

While Comey pretended nobody would be prosecuted for this kind of thing, there are real people in prison today for mishandling SCI material at a much less egregious level than keeping the material on an unsecured email server in Funk and Wagnell's basement bathroom closet.
 
It's tome to stop your bullshit. Trump purposefully took documents. Trump refused to return them. Trump lied about still having them, and the worst is that he was most likely showing them to other people. Then we can only wonder if he gave some away, or sold some of them.

Dude, keeping documents in your house for decades is a way more egregious violation of the law than having them in a locked basement room. Seriously, it really is.

I can imagine a President working on some documents in their house. Had that been the case with Brandon I would agree with you, but this was not that. The guy threw some documents on a shelf in his garage next to his Corvette, had them all over his house for decades. Pretending he "gave them up voluntarily" after illegally collecting them for more than 3 decades in his home is laughable.

He thought he'd show how he was "better", then suddenly we found out that he'd been illegally collecting documents that had no legal means of getting there in his house for decades. Senators are NOT allowed to take the documents from the SCIF, nor to take notes or any electronic means of copying them with them into the SCIF.

These documents had no means of even getting there without him first breaking the frickin' law.
 
Back
Top