Trump's defense brief amateurish- how befitting

Trump is going after the procedure as extra-Constitutional (which it clearly is)
but also the fact there was no incitement, and there was pre-planning

It absolutely is not. Trump has no defense so his lawyers will obfuscate and lie. Trump was stirring up hate for his whole term. he just used that pent-up hate when he thought it would work to overthrow the American government. There was planning. It was on Parler and other right-wing sites.
 
It absolutely is not. Trump has no defense so his lawyers will obfuscate and lie. Trump was stirring up hate for his whole term. he just used that pent-up hate when he thought it would work to overthrow the American government. There was planning. It was on Parler and other right-wing sites.
They believed, as many of the arrested have stated, that they were following Trump’s orders.
 
HE PARTICPATED IN THE PREPLANNING. Good grief, this might be your dumbest argument yet.

Pretty simple. Trump doesn't exist, doesn't contest as he did, didn't claim steal, seditious riot doesn't happen. So he is the but for/ logical cause.
He is also the legal cause due to his behavior on that day, having observed the riotous behavior of the crowd pre-intrusion, his words to them and the probable result of those words, and then...
that which was foreseeable and probable actually taking place= legal cause.

Good lord, after they are in there any other Potus would have implored them all to get the hell out, and not by smooching with them like he eventually did.
That conduct again shows his state of mind with respect to the riot.
 
Back
Top