trumps hire for Secretary of State!

Yakuda said:
If you actually believe the person you voted for was best then it's obvious you're incapable of independent thought.

Or they just dislike the shit you people peddle. It's never your fault is it. You people are like 3 year olds.
Click to expand...
48% of the voting public felt she was the best choice of the two. I am not alone here, almost half of us do not agree trump was the best choice.
 
Jarod said:
48% of the voting public felt she was the best choice of the two. I am not alone here, almost half of us do not agree trump was the best choice.
Click to expand...
I never suggested you were alone. What I said was thinking she was best is evidence that you are capable of independent thought. The fact that 48% of you lack that ability is scary.
 
Jarod said:
48% of the voting public felt she was the best choice of the two. I am not alone here, almost half of us do not agree trump was the best choice.
Click to expand...
What percentage of the forty eight only voted for her because they didn't want President Trump Because he hurt their feelings... Not because they thought she was the better choice... She clearly was not the better choice... more than a billion dollars and still a failure should tell you that... But then we always said there isn't enough money in the world to redefine someone...
 
Jarod said:
You think Rubio has transformed from that to Secretary of State material in 7 years?
Click to expand...
1) It hasn't been officially announced yet (but it is likely to be the case, given other moves being made in the background).
2) Trump appears to be doing this to remove Rubio from the senate (and the SSCI chair position).
3) Trump is keeping Rubio's role neutered (on a short leash).
 
Yakuda said:
I never suggested you were alone. What I said was thinking she was best is evidence that you are capable of independent thought. The fact that 48% of you lack that ability is scary.
Click to expand...
What indicates to you that people did not come to that conclusion using independent thought?
 
gfm7175 said:
1) It hasn't been officially announced yet (but it is likely to be the case, given other moves being made in the background).
2) Trump appears to be doing this to remove Rubio from the senate (and the SSCI chair position).
3) Trump is keeping Rubio's role neutered (on a short leash).
Click to expand...
I wonder what huge donor to trumps campaign will get Rubio's senate seat?
 
TOP said:
What percentage of the forty eight only voted for her because they didn't want President Trump Because he hurt their feelings... Not because they thought she was the better choice... She clearly was not the better choice... more than a billion dollars and still a failure should tell you that... But then we always said there isn't enough money in the world to redefine someone...
Click to expand...
I do not know, but I think its likely a very small percent that voted based on hurt feelings. She is clearly the better choice.
 
Jarod said:
What indicates to you that people did not come to that conclusion using independent thought?
Click to expand...
One thing is that when voters were exercising independent thought during the primaries leading up to the 2020 election the cackling kamal was soundly rejected just like last tuesday. Wale the fuck up buddy
 
Last edited:
archives said:
MAGA ain’t going like “little Marco,” huge Ukraine supporter, wait for that to change quickly, principles are always subjective in Trumpkinville
Click to expand...
It’s why I’m surprised by the appointment. Maybe, Trump’s ready to break up with Putin over the psych op.
Naked Melania and suggesting he’s compromised and Putie owns him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top