Oh, I'm dealing our buddy, Terry - you know "Terry" can be a girls name. Coincidence because he's a bitch? I think not!Traitor Terry, like all JPP MAGAts, isn't in full control of his faculties.
Trump’s latest ‘temper tantrum’ sparks calls for removal from office: ‘Insane’
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
Oh, a person said he would do it. Therefore, the Dems are all behind impeachment. Do ypou have that much trouble understanding how evidence works? Or understanding how logic and numbers work?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
MAGAts are evil liars. Sad. Terry is also a traitor for betraying his oath to the Constitution.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Legina the Snitch Bitch with more management Safe For Work approved posts.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
More whining from JPP's biggest Snitch Bitch.
signalmankenneth
Verified User
Fuck you asshole. You supported the assassination of your president so, fuck you!
Can't figure out between you and tom hartman, which is the most twisted.
Fuck you, asshole. You supported the brutal murder of 2 Americans in Minnesota.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
Fuck you asshole. You supported the assassination of your president so, fuck you!
Jake Starkey
Verified User
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Nordberg,
The problem with Congress is it is too partisan. The deals are mostly struck before the voting. As we saw, the 'trial' was a sham. The jurors voted to not even look at the evidence. It wasn't a trial at all. It was prejudiced.
The overall effect was the reverse of justice. Instead of the accused being found guilty by a preponderance of the evidence, the evidence was not even considered. The votes were in before the trial ever began. The accused then used to publicity to enhance his power. It had the opposite effect of what was intended by the Constitution which describes an actual trial, not a mock trial.
For that reason, impeachment in the age of heavily partisan politics and shameless bought politicians, should not be engaged in unless the votes for conviction are already indicated prior to the impeachment. Otherwise, it has the precise opposite effect from what is intended by those who would bring impeachment.
That's because the Senate gets to decide how they interpret the Constitution, and if they are only going to honor the letter of the document but not the intent then there is no point in initiating that useless backfiring process.
Republicans made an absolute mockery of the Constitution - twice. That is enough.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Let us not engage in a third unless there is some bite behind the bark.
The problem with Congress is it is too partisan. The deals are mostly struck before the voting. As we saw, the 'trial' was a sham. The jurors voted to not even look at the evidence. It wasn't a trial at all. It was prejudiced.
The overall effect was the reverse of justice. Instead of the accused being found guilty by a preponderance of the evidence, the evidence was not even considered. The votes were in before the trial ever began. The accused then used to publicity to enhance his power. It had the opposite effect of what was intended by the Constitution which describes an actual trial, not a mock trial.
For that reason, impeachment in the age of heavily partisan politics and shameless bought politicians, should not be engaged in unless the votes for conviction are already indicated prior to the impeachment. Otherwise, it has the precise opposite effect from what is intended by those who would bring impeachment.
That's because the Senate gets to decide how they interpret the Constitution, and if they are only going to honor the letter of the document but not the intent then there is no point in initiating that useless backfiring process.
Republicans made an absolute mockery of the Constitution - twice. That is enough.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Let us not engage in a third unless there is some bite behind the bark.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Ross Dolan,
It can't be like that because the Senate is too partisan to honor the intent of the Constitution. It's not an actual trail if the jurors refuse to even look at the evidence. Then it becomes a mock trial. In that case, the only way to get a conviction is if the conviction votes are there before the impeachment.
An impeachment is not an ordinary trial anyway. The accused is really being tried in the court of public opinion. Since maga was so strong at the time of both impeachments, the court of public opinion refused to convict. Therefore, the Senate merely reflected that. And that is precisely why any further impeachment must have a preponderance of a guilty verdict before being initiated or it will backfire just as surely as the first two.
To ignore this and assume they are going to honor the intent of the Constitution would be folly. It has been shown that is not happening.
It can't be like that because the Senate is too partisan to honor the intent of the Constitution. It's not an actual trail if the jurors refuse to even look at the evidence. Then it becomes a mock trial. In that case, the only way to get a conviction is if the conviction votes are there before the impeachment.
An impeachment is not an ordinary trial anyway. The accused is really being tried in the court of public opinion. Since maga was so strong at the time of both impeachments, the court of public opinion refused to convict. Therefore, the Senate merely reflected that. And that is precisely why any further impeachment must have a preponderance of a guilty verdict before being initiated or it will backfire just as surely as the first two.
To ignore this and assume they are going to honor the intent of the Constitution would be folly. It has been shown that is not happening.