Trumps Personality, a response to thing1

BRUTALITOPS

on indefiniate mod break
Contributor
have to make this thread because thing1 threadbans me from an honest discussion which is really weaksauce. I never troll when people ask honest and sincere questions. What is wrong with you thing1?

There are a lot of "you guys are so crazy" sentiments directed toward the lefties here. Definitely an expression that the left is way over the top, and just being "sore losers."

Can anyone on the other side explain to me what it is about Trump's personality that gives you cause to express that? How does he seem intelligent & measured to you? Is his personality somehow one that should NOT lend itself to a heightened level of concern? Is he someone that you would trust with even a small, personal situation - much less the welfare of our country & the free world?

I'm actually interested to here someone defend him as even a marginally acceptable disposition to take this office.

Here is the thing thing1, the reason you are a bit flummoxed is because you have been living in an alternate reality. You may say I am using hyperbole here, but I mean that in a very literal way. Your view of reality and America in general was mis-aligned, so your baseline is off.

First, the reason why so many people like trump is because he is a winner. That's what a lot of it boils down to. People keep saying he can't do x y and z and he proves them wrong time and time again. He isn't a serious candidate. He can't get the nom. He can't win the general.

Lets look at what trump was up against. He was up against 16 other repubicans, many who had huge establishment backing and large coffers. Jeb had 100 million, and he drained every penny of it. Trump made jeb look like a bitch. He steamrolled the GOP establishment. Then he had to face an insurgent movement from his own party with Romney... the literal former GOP nominee trashing him and starting the nevertrump movement. He outlasted that. Then people called his convention a disaster, they called his comments about mccain not being a war hero a disaster, they called his treatment of the khans a disaster, they called him eating a taco bowl a disaster. They called his comments about megyn kelly and rosie o donnel a disaster. Trump kept winning.

Then as we know, it was impossible for him to win the general. Hillary spent a billion dollars to take him down. She MASSIVELY outspent him, something people forget to mention (I don't have the numbers on hand).. and instead he flips states that haven't been red in almost 3 decades. (No one gives a shit about commie-fornia).

The other reason he appeals to people is he is changing the dialogue of america. He is smashing p.c. culture. We have had so much SJW bullshit for the last couple of years, it's very refreshing to take all that stuff down a notch... if you have the literal president of the united states grabbing pusssy, telling it like it is, you cannot say "America is not like this", or "America doesn't stand for that. And that's what a lot of your confusion boils down to.

He literally seems insane to me - someone who is completely detached from reality.

I have noticed that you have seemed like you are actually take the time for some legitimate introspection these days. You really have a desire for understanding, a wonder of what went wrong and what you missed. I commend you for that.

Here is the thing, when 60 million voters vote for somebody, when nearly 50% of the electorate votes for someone like trump, you can't pretend he is some massively outside the mainstream figure. You cannot marginalize him in that way. He represents the wishes of half the electorate. What you thought of as a baseline for normalcy was mis-aligned, and that's what is ultimately throwing you for a loop.

It's ok to call elizabeth warren pocahauntus. It is perfectly fine to like to grab some pussy when you are a star (as all the women want you to). This is normal. This is our actual, true reality, and you are living in it. Adjust accordingly and like focusing a lens, everything will become sharper to you.

In conclusion, I think a lot of liberals are prisoners of their own rhetoric. If you go back and look from 2008, people were calling mccain the next hitler. Then they called romney the next hitler. Then they did the same thing to trump. The only difference is trump won, so now liberals are stuck. While I don't think trump is going to be this awesome president, I do think your fears are almost entirely unfounded, baseless, and boy cried wolf syndrome. How many times do you get to call a GOP candidate hitler before no one listens to you anymore?

Trump has swagger, he is a populist, he keeps winning, and he grabs pussy. America finds that very appealing.
 
First, the reason why so many people like trump is because he is a winner. That's what a lot of it boils down to. People keep saying he can't do x y and z and he proves them wrong time and time again. He isn't a serious candidate. He can't get the nom. He can't win the general.

Trump wasn't a serious candidate. He ran just for the sake of running; to be in the spotlight on the largest wreality stage. He ran in the GOP primary, even though he is lifelong Democrat and leftist. He behaved in a manner that a party with actual principles would disavow, but, only establishment types, such as myself, had the character to denounce his antics. Populists have never had principles, or character, so he naturally appealed to a lot of voters. When he finally gets the opportunity to propose single-payer socialized healthcare, he will still not be denounced by these people.
 
"First, the reason why so many people like trump is because he is a winner." MM #1

"We will have so much winning if I get elected, that you may get bored with winning." Republican leading presidential candidate Donald Trump - September, 2015


Dandy.

U.S. Army Chief of Staff General Eric Shinseki was a wise and effective COS. He's the one that warned in open hearing that the U.S. would need many more U.S. military troops to occupy a conquered ("liberated") Iraq. 400K? I forget the number.
But President Bush (younger) deployed a small fraction of what General Shinseki specified. The rest is history; precisely what Shinseki predicted.
So Shinseki was right, and Bush was wrong.

Dandy.

After Shinseki left the military he was put in charge of the VA. But his military talent didn't translate well to the new assignment, and he foundered.

SO WHAT ?!

So exquisite aptitude in one area of endeavor does not necessarily translate to competence in another.

There are numerous skeptics about Trump, starting with:

- the voters. Trump lost the popular vote by millions of ballots. So Trump lacks the endorsement of the whole People, on democratic basis.

- numerous Democrats.

- numerous others, including political conservatives that regard Trump an empty suit

- high ranking Republicans, including Mitt Romney, Majority Leader McConnell, and Speaker Ryan.

We'll see.

Trump has surprised some before, winning both the nomination, and the election.

BUT !!

The skills required to do that do not NECESSARILY translate into superior executive political skill.

Trump may end up being the best U.S. president ever born, past, present, and future.

That's fine. BUT !!

It is not a certitude.
 
I don't know what you are arguing sear. I am answering a question on why so many people like trump. It's an objective thing, 60 million people like him. There is a reason why.
 
I don't know what you are arguing sear. I am answering a question on why so many people like trump. It's an objective thing, 60 million people like him. There is a reason why.

60 million people are proles. There is no reason to like Trump in a manner which appeals to one's better nature. Someone doesn't become a Trumptard because they are well-educated or highly moral.
 
"First, the reason why so many people like trump is because he is a winner." MM #1

"We will have so much winning if I get elected, that you may get bored with winning." Republican leading presidential candidate Donald Trump - September, 2015


Dandy.

U.S. Army Chief of Staff General Eric Shinseki was a wise and effective COS. He's the one that warned in open hearing that the U.S. would need many more U.S. military troops to occupy a conquered ("liberated") Iraq. 400K? I forget the number.
But President Bush (younger) deployed a small fraction of what General Shinseki specified. The rest is history; precisely what Shinseki predicted.
So Shinseki was right, and Bush was wrong.

Dandy.

After Shinseki left the military he was put in charge of the VA. But his military talent didn't translate well to the new assignment, and he foundered.

SO WHAT ?!

So exquisite aptitude in one area of endeavor does not necessarily translate to competence in another.

There are numerous skeptics about Trump, starting with:

- the voters. Trump lost the popular vote by millions of ballots. So Trump lacks the endorsement of the whole People, on democratic basis.

- numerous Democrats.

- numerous others, including political conservatives that regard Trump an empty suit

- high ranking Republicans, including Mitt Romney, Majority Leader McConnell, and Speaker Ryan.

We'll see.

Trump has surprised some before, winning both the nomination, and the election.

BUT !!

The skills required to do that do not NECESSARILY translate into superior executive political skill.

Trump may end up being the best U.S. president ever born, past, present, and future.

That's fine. BUT !!

It is not a certitude.
So why don't just shut up until he has been in power for at least 100 days?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
"I don't know what you are arguing sear." DT #4

Being beloved is not a guarantor of immaculate presidential competence.

"I am answering a question on why so many people like trump." DT #4

That doesn't validate their opinion. Ockham's Razor. More likely they're merely gullible BUFFOONS that think: I'm going to "make America great again" is not merely a realistic campaign commitment, but a valid basis upon which to award their once per four year vote.

"It's an objective thing, 60 million people like him. There is a reason why." DT #4

Unquestionably. I'm glad you're willing to admit it.
Trump has made clear, he's long on soaring, superlative rhetoric, but is so shy on detail he refuses the standard U.S. intelligence briefing that all the others have accepted.

This does not bode well for the United States, and Clapper said so in open hearing. He ought to know.

"So why don't just shut up until he has been in power for at least 100 days?" M #6

Because when innocents are approaching a peril unaware, I'm inclined to warn them. Know it or not, believe it or not, like it or not, admit it or not, we may be in thermonuclear war with North Korea and China before Groundhog Day.
 
60 million people are proles. There is no reason to like Trump in a manner which appeals to one's better nature. Someone doesn't become a Trumptard because they are well-educated or highly moral.

basically​ all of america is proles. The prole factor cancels out.
 
"I don't know what you are arguing sear." DT #4

Being beloved is not a guarantor of immaculate presidential competence.

that wasn't the original question though. You are arguing something completely different. Please keep focused.

Alsoplease learn to use the quote feature. Your posts are almost unbearable to read. Are you like really old or something? This isn't usenet
 
60 million people are proles. There is no reason to like Trump in a manner which appeals to one's better nature. Someone doesn't become a Trumptard because they are well-educated or highly moral.

b2fd93a6603f1d06d2009541e811c7ae9c5867db6e3640930e8bca89c085c3b9.jpg
 
So why don't just shut up until he has been in power for at least 100 days?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

Sear was actually giving Trump the benefit of the doubt.

As one of the 60 million Trump voters, if I had to boil it all down to one reason for voting for him, it's that I saw a potential in Trump to bring *real change* to this country when it's sorely needed. I totally admit it's a roll of the dice and have said as much more times than I can count.

The personality thing doesn't matter to me. This isn't a damned congeniality contest. We need a leader, not a preacher or a Pope.

I don't know how it's going to turn out, but I'm cautiously optimistic.
 
Sear was actually giving Trump the benefit of the doubt.

As one of the 60 million Trump voters, if I had to boil it all down to one reason for voting for him, it's that I saw a potential in Trump to bring *real change* to this country when it's sorely needed. I totally admit it's a roll of the dice and have said as much more times than I can count.

The personality thing doesn't matter to me. This isn't a damned congeniality contest. We need a leader, not a preacher or a Pope.

I don't know how it's going to turn out, but I'm cautiously optimistic.
I have used the exact same phrase in comments with you -and it's exactly the reason I voted for him. I suspect many more feel the same. This isn't working -"roll the dice"

Trump's message resonates. The Chinese are eating our lunch and eyeing our dinner,and our "leaders"are a bunch of globalists
who sell us out on some weird etherial non-existent concept of Free Trade ( while others protect their market)

Add in the fact HRClinton was thoroughly disgusting/out of touch/messageless/ ( i could go on) -and it was
"what have I got to lose?" as Trump himself said to the black community. 1/2 of all America felt the same
 
I have used the exact same phrase in comments with you -and it's exactly the reason I voted for him. I suspect many more feel the same. This isn't working -"roll the dice"

Trump's message resonates. The Chinese are eating our lunch and eyeing our dinner,and our "leaders"are a bunch of globalists
who sell us out on some weird etherial non-existent concept of Free Trade ( while others protect their market)

Add in the fact HRClinton was thoroughly disgusting/out of touch/messageless/ ( i could go on) -and it was
"what have I got to lose?" as Trump himself said to the black community. 1/2 of all America felt the same

Throw Hillary into the mix and it was a no-brainer. President Hillary would do many unsavory things, but surprise us wouldn't be one of them.

Trump's detractors never seem to tire of underestimating him. I'm moderately confident their losing trend will only continue.

But only time will tell.
 
"I don't know what you are arguing sear." DT #4

"Being beloved is not a guarantor of immaculate presidential competence." s

"that wasn't the original question though. You are arguing something completely different. Please keep focused."


It was DIRECTLY responsive to what YOU labeled your "FIRST" point. I quote you precisely:

"First, the reason why so many people like trump is because he is a winner." DT #1

Anyone that's ever won $4.oo on a $2.oo lottery ticket is "a winner" (your term). That doesn't mean they'd be a successful president. I explained that with a specific historic example in post #3.

"Alsoplease learn to use the quote feature. Your posts are almost unbearable to read. Are you like really old or something? This isn't usenet" DT #10

a) Lemme guess. Rather than a desktop computer, you're using a "mobile device"?

b) On my UHD desktop display, the format is clear:
- quotations in bold
- replies not in bold

c) You insult me by assuming that my avoiding the quote feature is out of ignorance. I may have been using it while you were still in high school. Therefore, Ockham's Razor

d) I have another reason for DELIBERATELY avoiding the quote feature.
Specifically:
In my limited experience w/ this site's software (editor), when I block-copy from a previous post to respond to it, the text inside quote-feature highlight are not transferred.
Instead, even though they were DELIBERATELY selected, they are removed without request or permission.

To circumvent this defect, I use bold highlight, because block-copy / cut-&-paste text that is bold text is included.

I'd be DELIGHTED to comply with your request, if you will have our Internet host correct this substantial software defect, that is clearly ruffling so many feathers.

Do that, and the problem is solved.
My thanks to you in advance for your kind cooperation in correcting this defect.

"The personality thing doesn't matter to me. This isn't a damned congeniality contest. We need a leader, not a preacher or a Pope." DO #12

Ditto.

BUT !!

In context of the President Clinton impeachment, revolving around Lewinsky-gate: President Obama articulated the hypocrisy quite well.

“You claim the mantle of the party of family values, and this is the guy you nominate”. President Obama commenting on the Republican party's nomination of Donald Trump (during headline news of Trump boasting about inappropriate behavior w/ women) FOX / Google 16/10/13

So it's only bad if a Democrat does it?

HYPOCRITES !!
 
im not reading that. look at the lower right of a post you want to reference. click "reply with quote"

you can also do this:

[.quote]
stuff you are quoting like a normal human being that has updated their internet skills at least as recent as 1999
[./quote]

remove the . in the brackets
 
I have noticed that you have seemed like you are actually take the time for some legitimate introspection these days. You really have a desire for understanding, a wonder of what went wrong and what you missed. I commend you for that.

How hard was it to keep a straight face when typing this?
 
the final number is 1.2 billion spent by hillary with a couple of 100k left over. The most spent by any candidate ever. Trump spent 600 million and had around 7ish million leftover. I dont see why the liberals who want money out of politics dont see this as a victory.

FYI during the campaign Trump said that he would not need 1 billion to win and was mocked for it and said that he estimated he would spent 100m of his own money. He spent 66m.

Republicans the "big business" party according to the liberals spent 633.1 m for federal office in 2016. Democrats the party of the poor spent 799.5 m for federal office in 2016.
 
Sear was actually giving Trump the benefit of the doubt.

As one of the 60 million Trump voters, if I had to boil it all down to one reason for voting for him, it's that I saw a potential in Trump to bring *real change* to this country when it's sorely needed. I totally admit it's a roll of the dice and have said as much more times than I can count.

The personality thing doesn't matter to me. This isn't a damned congeniality contest. We need a leader, not a preacher or a Pope.

I don't know how it's going to turn out, but I'm cautiously optimistic.

Did you actually believe this stuff before you jumped onto the Trump Train, or did you always not care about the character of your elected officials?
 
I can't optimize it to your device because I have no access to it.
I tailor it to my display screen, a top of the line UHD desktop monitor.
This graphic blurs and shrinks it. The image is much clearer before the image host compression.

b4f250d4186361be90f74aaf1e38dfa37273b13.JPG


Even compressed it's plain to see the format is perfectly adequate.
If there's a problem at your end, why don't YOU fix it?
 
Back
Top