Trump's poll numbers confirm the media is still just 'crying wolf

dukkha

Verified User
We are all familiar with the tale of the “Boy Who Cried Wolf;” and we certainly all remember it being used as allegory for how the media wailed about Donald Trump over and over in 2016.
In the campaign version, the ominous ending came true: the big, bad, golden-haired wolf devoured the media, which tried its best to prevent his election.

Now two years on, the characters are the same, and the fairytale has begun in its familiar way with the media sounding the alarm each evening about the Trump gossip du jour. The end won’t come soon, though.
It is clear that the story has now entered its very important — yet sometimes unnoticed — second phase:
The part where the townspeople stop paying attention.

As the media endeavors to whip Trump outrage into a public frenzy, the president is enjoying his highest poll numbers of the past year. The last time the RealClearPolitics approval rating reached 44 percent was March 14, 2017, and came right on the heels of a promising jobs report from his first full month in office

In May of 2018, the media is still crying wolf; and their screams are growing louder even though the panic is failing to set in.
Rather than ringing the church bells, the villagers are simply looking in the forest for themselves.
Instead of finding the Russian wolf (or Stormy Daniels, or Michael Cohen’s taxi medallions,
or whatever the day’s rumormongering may be), they are peering through the trees and seeing tangible economic growth, cooperation on the Korean peninsula, and America reasserting itself abroad.

We can measure just how much crying the media has been doing; and likewise, we can quantify how fewer and fewer people are actually paying them any mind.

Trump’s approval rating among registered voters has been on the rise, and one poll even has him above 50 percent. Another poll now has the GOP actually picking up a significant amount of Senate seats in the midterms. But perhaps the most difficult statistic for Democrats and left-leaning journalists to digest is found in the latest CNN poll: 57 percent of respondents believe that things are going well in the U.S., the largest proportion to say so since January of 2007.

All this while the latest Media Research Center study shows an overwhelming — almost laughable — negative bias against the president. In the first part of the year, 91 percent of network news coverage of the president was anti-Trump.

Moreover, some of the polling actually indicates that Trump is gaining ground on the performance issues that the media has actually railed the loudest against.

For the most stark example, consider how the media covered the GOP tax reform.
Despite research showing that its passing would grow the economy and benefit the overwhelming majority of middle-class taxpayers, most of the networks and newspapers parroted Democratic “end of the world” talking points. For them, the tax plan was a “gift to the rich,” would “devastate science,” and will “cause thousands to die.” Liberal politicians and pundits alike were certain that middle income Americans would be “scrooged,” despite the fact that even the Tax Policy Center agreed 80 percent of the country will see more in their paychecks.

Unsurprisingly, the tax plan faced public opposition at the time it was passed and while it was in the crosshairs of unfavorable media attention. However, now that Americans are seeing the results for themselves, its support is obviously growing
.
Even the New York Times found that its popularity up by 14 percentage points in two months.
As it turns out, Americans are happier with a bit of extra cash in their wallet…
go figure.

Moreover, Trump’s overall approval rating is being buoyed by a new surge in middle-class support. On May 1, Reuters reported a nearly 12 point jump in just two weeks among voters earning between $25k and $100k; and when limited to just Democrats, it became a 10 point swing. Overall, 57 percent of people are happy with the president’s job performance on the economy.

These stats come as Democratic politicians and media pundits still try desperately to spin to their yarn that the sinister tax-cutting wolf is on its way.

On foreign policy, the notion that the public is not buying the media’s story is also fairly clear. In 2017, “experts” flooded the airwaves and editorial pages to warn us that Trump’s posturing against North Korea would end in nothing less than nuclear war.

For the non-experts out there, the fruitful diplomacy of late between President Trump, North Korea, and our regional allies, has actually been taken as a positive step. Believe it or not, Americans may have noticed that the nuclear war didn’t pan out.

In the last two months, Trump’s job approval on foreign policy jumped 5 points in Economist/YouGov polls and 6 points in Reuters/Ipsos. Most telling, 55 percent of Democrats believe it is “very likely” or “somewhat likely” the recent progress in the region will actually end the Korean conflict, once and for all.

The disconnect between the nightly news and the average Joe must frustrate the president as he makes progress on a number of fronts. His tweets about “fake news” are self-evident.

But on the other hand, it may seem that at least a part of POTUS delights in the idea of the media crying wolf. When pundits wail the loudest, Trump seems to laugh the hardest. He just headlined the NRA convention, after all.

The smart bet would be that Trump’s trolling of the media would only grow as their bias is questioned and relevance wanes. In order to regain their influence over the American public, they have to stop crying wolf; and that, we can be sure, won’t happen anytime soon. Just ask the boy.

Joseph Borelli is the minority whip of the New York City Council,
http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...s-confirm-the-media-is-still-just-crying-wolf
 
I never thought Trump would get 5% of the far right wing vote, then I didn't think he would get 10% of national vote. I cannot explain why 44% of my fellow Americans thinking Trump should be President. Maybe I am wrong. Or not.
 
I never thought Trump would get 5% of the far right wing vote, then I didn't think he would get 10% of national vote. I cannot explain why 44% of my fellow Americans thinking Trump should be President. Maybe I am wrong. Or not.

Trump haters confuse Trumps personal life (the man) which they hate with his job performance (president) which isn't all that bad overall. His biggest problem is his EGO and attitude. But back to job performance some would hate him simply because he has a R behind his name. And no matter how good he did they would disagree.
 
Trump haters confuse Trumps personal life (the man) which they hate with his job performance (president) which isn't all that bad overall.

Yes, it is. Particularly bad this year. Since the tax cut went into effect, economic growth slowed by 0.6%, the market lost 400 points, the deficit exploded to $1T, and wages have stagnated. He created the fewest number of jobs in 2017 since 2010, and is on track to create even fewer this year.


His biggest problem is his EGO and attitude. But back to job performance some would hate him simply because he has a R behind his name. And no matter how good he did they would disagree.

No, his job performance sucks. He rode Obama's coattails through 2017, and has made a mess of things in 2018.
 
Trump haters confuse Trumps personal life (the man) which they hate with his job performance (president) which isn't all that bad overall. His biggest problem is his EGO and attitude. But back to job performance some would hate him simply because he has a R behind his name. And no matter how good he did they would disagree.

I wouldn't label it "confused," and it isn't just "trump haters," if things were going as good as conservatives would like to believe his numbers should be well over fifty, and using the media as a scapegoat doesn't explain why they aren't that high
 
We are all familiar with the tale of the “Boy Who Cried Wolf;” and we certainly all remember it being used as allegory for how the media wailed about Donald Trump over and over in 2016.
In the campaign version, the ominous ending came true: the big, bad, golden-haired wolf devoured the media, which tried its best to prevent his election.

Now two years on, the characters are the same, and the fairytale has begun in its familiar way with the media sounding the alarm each evening about the Trump gossip du jour. The end won’t come soon, though.
It is clear that the story has now entered its very important — yet sometimes unnoticed — second phase:
The part where the townspeople stop paying attention.

As the media endeavors to whip Trump outrage into a public frenzy, the president is enjoying his highest poll numbers of the past year. The last time the RealClearPolitics approval rating reached 44 percent was March 14, 2017, and came right on the heels of a promising jobs report from his first full month in office

In May of 2018, the media is still crying wolf; and their screams are growing louder even though the panic is failing to set in.
Rather than ringing the church bells, the villagers are simply looking in the forest for themselves.
Instead of finding the Russian wolf (or Stormy Daniels, or Michael Cohen’s taxi medallions,
or whatever the day’s rumormongering may be), they are peering through the trees and seeing tangible economic growth, cooperation on the Korean peninsula, and America reasserting itself abroad.

We can measure just how much crying the media has been doing; and likewise, we can quantify how fewer and fewer people are actually paying them any mind.

Trump’s approval rating among registered voters has been on the rise, and one poll even has him above 50 percent. Another poll now has the GOP actually picking up a significant amount of Senate seats in the midterms. But perhaps the most difficult statistic for Democrats and left-leaning journalists to digest is found in the latest CNN poll: 57 percent of respondents believe that things are going well in the U.S., the largest proportion to say so since January of 2007.

All this while the latest Media Research Center study shows an overwhelming — almost laughable — negative bias against the president. In the first part of the year, 91 percent of network news coverage of the president was anti-Trump.

Moreover, some of the polling actually indicates that Trump is gaining ground on the performance issues that the media has actually railed the loudest against.

For the most stark example, consider how the media covered the GOP tax reform.
Despite research showing that its passing would grow the economy and benefit the overwhelming majority of middle-class taxpayers, most of the networks and newspapers parroted Democratic “end of the world” talking points. For them, the tax plan was a “gift to the rich,” would “devastate science,” and will “cause thousands to die.” Liberal politicians and pundits alike were certain that middle income Americans would be “scrooged,” despite the fact that even the Tax Policy Center agreed 80 percent of the country will see more in their paychecks.

Unsurprisingly, the tax plan faced public opposition at the time it was passed and while it was in the crosshairs of unfavorable media attention. However, now that Americans are seeing the results for themselves, its support is obviously growing
.
Even the New York Times found that its popularity up by 14 percentage points in two months.
As it turns out, Americans are happier with a bit of extra cash in their wallet…
go figure.

Moreover, Trump’s overall approval rating is being buoyed by a new surge in middle-class support. On May 1, Reuters reported a nearly 12 point jump in just two weeks among voters earning between $25k and $100k; and when limited to just Democrats, it became a 10 point swing. Overall, 57 percent of people are happy with the president’s job performance on the economy.

These stats come as Democratic politicians and media pundits still try desperately to spin to their yarn that the sinister tax-cutting wolf is on its way.

On foreign policy, the notion that the public is not buying the media’s story is also fairly clear. In 2017, “experts” flooded the airwaves and editorial pages to warn us that Trump’s posturing against North Korea would end in nothing less than nuclear war.

For the non-experts out there, the fruitful diplomacy of late between President Trump, North Korea, and our regional allies, has actually been taken as a positive step. Believe it or not, Americans may have noticed that the nuclear war didn’t pan out.

In the last two months, Trump’s job approval on foreign policy jumped 5 points in Economist/YouGov polls and 6 points in Reuters/Ipsos. Most telling, 55 percent of Democrats believe it is “very likely” or “somewhat likely” the recent progress in the region will actually end the Korean conflict, once and for all.

The disconnect between the nightly news and the average Joe must frustrate the president as he makes progress on a number of fronts. His tweets about “fake news” are self-evident.

But on the other hand, it may seem that at least a part of POTUS delights in the idea of the media crying wolf. When pundits wail the loudest, Trump seems to laugh the hardest. He just headlined the NRA convention, after all.

The smart bet would be that Trump’s trolling of the media would only grow as their bias is questioned and relevance wanes. In order to regain their influence over the American public, they have to stop crying wolf; and that, we can be sure, won’t happen anytime soon. Just ask the boy.

Joseph Borelli is the minority whip of the New York City Council,
http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...s-confirm-the-media-is-still-just-crying-wolf

No one is "crying wolf," the network news, not cable, is merely reporting the events of the day.

The survey site, Media Research Center, is famous for its' framed partisan reports, but even accepting it might be half correct, why is it surprising? Trump puts himself in the middle of nearly every story coming out of Washington, even when it is not about him he will weigh in, and a large portion of his views are purposely designed to raise controversy. That's not reporting just negative news, but news, remember when he boasted during the primaries he got all the free coverage via the media?
 
Yes, it is. Particularly bad this year. Since the tax cut went into effect, economic growth slowed by 0.6%, the market lost 400 points, the deficit exploded to $1T, and wages have stagnated. He created the fewest number of jobs in 2017 since 2010, and is on track to create even fewer this year.




No, his job performance sucks. He rode Obama's coattails through 2017, and has made a mess of things in 2018.

Let's see National unemployment rate when Trump took office was 4.8% Apr. 2018 it was 3.8% damn down a whole percentage point yea that's bad.
The market was at 19K Jan 2017 it's at 24K today. and heaven forbid that the market has fluctuations. But think what you want his job performance is ok not spectacular but acceptable.
 
I wouldn't label it "confused," and it isn't just "trump haters," if things were going as good as conservatives would like to believe his numbers should be well over fifty, and using the media as a scapegoat doesn't explain why they aren't that high

I believe that when polled a lot of Americans respond to the daily dirt being put out by the media. Plus to most people their job performance rate is tied to what they see locally and sadly what party the president belongs to.
 
Trump haters confuse Trumps personal life (the man) which they hate with his job performance (president) which isn't all that bad overall. His biggest problem is his EGO and attitude. But back to job performance some would hate him simply because he has a R behind his name. And no matter how good he did they would disagree.

You talking about his one program, a tax cut that is 84 percent for the super wealthy and adds 2 trillion to the debt? That good? Or do you approve of him walking out on an international agreement who our allies begged him to stay in? How about ending net neutrality? You like that? How about loading government bureaus with lobbyists who squander tax money as they destroy the agencies from the inside. His job performance is dismal. His rhetoric is hateful and divides the nation. You like that?
 
No one is "crying wolf," the network news, not cable, is merely reporting the events of the day.


"merely reporting the events of the day" is not accurate. They are only reporting on specific stories that either help the lefty cause, or hurt the righty cause. The selection of what they report on is as predictable as how a JPP lefties respond to posts here on this forum. The end goal is partisan and already established, so they report anything that points toward that goal while overlooking anything that doesn't.

What you should have posted was "merely reporting filtered events of the day".
 
You talking about his one program, a tax cut that is 84 percent for the super wealthy and adds 2 trillion to the debt? That good? Or do you approve of him walking out on an international agreement who our allies begged him to stay in? How about ending net neutrality? You like that? How about loading government bureaus with lobbyists who squander tax money as they destroy the agencies from the inside. His job performance is dismal. His rhetoric is hateful and divides the nation. You like that?

No I am simply saying that overall he isn't a total failure like Carter was. Do I agree with him on everything no but it isn't my call to say if he is right or wrong as I don't have all the info to make a real call an a subject, unlike the left that has a crystal ball to guide them. As to the tax cut and the rich. Surprise, surprise, surprise, if you make more you get a bigger cut of the pie. My tax cut is much higher than someone making half what I make so is that unfair in your eyes? As to the debt you guys sure weren't worried when Obama added 3 trillion to the debt. No all I see here is partisan politics. And the funny thing is I am not a Trump fan.
 
No I am simply saying that overall he isn't a total failure like Carter was. Do I agree with him on everything no but it isn't my call to say if he is right or wrong as I don't have all the info to make a real call an a subject, unlike the left that has a crystal ball to guide them. As to the tax cut and the rich. Surprise, surprise, surprise, if you make more you get a bigger cut of the pie. My tax cut is much higher than someone making half what I make so is that unfair in your eyes? As to the debt you guys sure weren't worried when Obama added 3 trillion to the debt. No all I see here is partisan politics. And the funny thing is I am not a Trump fan.


Surprise surprise, that never happens. The debt has been predicted by the CBO. 2 trillion is a lock. I also know that Obama was faced with a potential depression and it took a lot to set the economy back on track. And Obama addressed the debt . Trump just cranked it up making the rich richer.
 
And the Obama myth continues. Keep believing that liberal BS. Yes we were in a depression but your hero did nothing that shortened it in fact his ineffectual policies prolonged it.
 
And the Obama myth continues. Keep believing that liberal BS. Yes we were in a depression but your hero did nothing that shortened it in fact his ineffectual policies prolonged it.

That was damn stupid. I am sure a ridiculous statement like that has to have some evidence, not just low info haters barf. Please provide some. That should be fun.
 
That was damn stupid. I am sure a ridiculous statement like that has to have some evidence, not just low info haters barf. Please provide some. That should be fun.

Well sport you believe he got the economy to recover from the depression and I say he didn't you have economists on your side and I have economist on my side so believe what you will.
 
"merely reporting the events of the day" is not accurate. They are only reporting on specific stories that either help the lefty cause, or hurt the righty cause. The selection of what they report on is as predictable as how a JPP lefties respond to posts here on this forum. The end goal is partisan and already established, so they report anything that points toward that goal while overlooking anything that doesn't.

What you should have posted was "merely reporting filtered events of the day".

Not true, if Trump works to put himself at the center of each day's media agenda he is obviously going to be the focus of the nightly news, he caters the attention, and he gets it, as far as emphasis on negative news, when was the last time any news broadcast anywhere highlighted the good news of the day?

This whole "fake news" chatter is a myth, fact is Trump doesn't like any critical review of what he is doing, and to insure the base doesn't believe it he labels it as fake.

He is playing off the misconception that "balanced" automatically means facts, it doesn't, you can present the opposing narrative but that doesn't mean it is accurate
 
Back
Top