Trump’s Right: New Year’s Eve May Be The Coldest On Record

countryboy said:
In other words, you have no idea what you are talking about, and are simply regurgitating the issued talking points. Got it.
Click to expand...

Oh, and to add - the idea that temporary weather patterns are meaningless aren't "talking points." As I mentioned, many on the right who understand the topic get this as well. It's science - not "talking points."
 
Thing1 said:
Oh, I won't stand by Gore. He was definitely an alarmist. I'm not an AGW proponent.

But it's silly to see temporary weather events as anything consequential. Global warming/climate change is about patterns over long periods of time. A cold spell, or a warm spell, doesn't tell us anything.

You guys should understand the topic better if you're going to comment on it. Most on the right who understand it acknowledge climate change, but also argue that man has little to do w/ it.
Click to expand...

So you can't answer the questions ...

The Goracle predicted an epidemic of Katrinas slamming the U.S. every year? What happened?

Your computer climate models have failed to predict the warming hiatus. What happened, Nostradamus?

... and you're too stupid to realize you're being mocked for Al Gorian hysteria over weather events. :palm:
 
Bigdog said:
So you can't answer the questions ...

The Goracle predicted an epidemic of Katrinas slamming the U.S. every year? What happened?

Your computer climate models have failed to predict the warming hiatus. What happened, Nostradamus?

... and you're too stupid to realize you're being mocked for Al Gorian hysteria over weather events. :palm:
Click to expand...

None of that even makes sense. If you're mocking me for Al Gore's hysteria, you're really quite foolish, because I said I don't stand by him on the topic - never did.

Again - you sound a bit desperate. You should read more on the topic; I'll just leave you w/ that.
 
Shape Shifter said:
I am being kind, even talking to you, as I have a vast hinterland of knowledge on this subject.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

superfluous comma


No shit shaper, you possess an ocean of knowledge exactly one inch deep and leagues of disinformation you spew on the web like the deepwater horizon does oil in the formerly pristine mental seascape.
 
Thing1 said:
Tom, you don't really have a "vast hinterland."

You're an example of a little knowledge being a dangerous thing.
Click to expand...
Even if that were true, which it isn't, you would never be in a position to judge. I don't bring that much of my knowledge here because it would be wasted to a great extent. Quoting Matthew's gospel, casting pearls before swine is the appropriate response to you.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Micawber said:
superfluous comma


No shit shaper, you possess an ocean of knowledge exactly one inch deep and leagues of disinformation you spew on the web like the deepwater horizon does oil in the formerly pristine mental seascape.
Click to expand...

Pathetic, you're not worth wasting time on. So I will allow you to bleat endlessly into the cybersphere unread and ignored by me.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Thing1 said:
None of that even makes sense. If you're mocking me for Al Gore's hysteria, you're really quite foolish, because I said I don't stand by him on the topic - never did.

Again - you sound a bit desperate. You should read more on the topic; I'll just leave you w/ that.
Click to expand...

The Goracle is the Socialist leader of the Leftwing AGW hysteria movement.

Breaking News Alert!

The Hillbag lost!
 
Thing1 said:
Please explain what you meant with the bolded.
Click to expand...
You're not very bright are you, I was anticipating the usual limp responses and was proved right. It's truly sad, after all my attempts to educate you on the subject, this is the best you can do.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Shape Shifter said:
You're not very bright are you, I was anticipating the usual limp responses and was proved right. It's truly sad, after all my attempts to educate you on the subject, this is the best you can do.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

So, it's "not very bright" to interpret a sentence as it is written?

"you'll get the usual bullshit about the difference between climate and weather"

Ergo, the difference between climate & weather is the "usual BS." And that supports your overall stance on the thread, as well.

I think you realize how ignorant the initial premise was, and now you're running away from it. But what you wrote is clear as day (to anyone bright).
 
Thing1 said:
Can you explain what you meant with what you're now saying is a poorly worded OP?
Click to expand...

I am saying nothing of the kind, it is perfectly obvious what was meant ffs. I mean, holy fuck, are you truly that dense that you think I don't know the difference between weather and climate? I was taught that way back in Geography lessons many moons ago.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Thing1 said:
Yep, sure is. You were saying that the difference between climate & weather is the "usual BS."

With your vast hinterlands of knowledge.
Click to expand...
I went all the way through university studying pure chemistry with some atmospheric chemistry and physics thrown in but never attained the doctorate level of understanding you obviously possess. They taught me the Arrhenius equation, IR bending and stretching absorption frequencies of CO2 along with water vapour, methane etc. but learning about weather and climate was far too advanced for me.

I have noticed over the years that you never discuss or even divulge your own level of academic attainment. I am sure that is out of embarrassment more than anything, it is certainly not modesty that's for sure.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top