Trust me, Trump says, Ill fix the problems, only after you give up all your leverage.

Its TACO refusing to fund SNAP.
Yup.

Anyone arguing that 'they' and not Trump are correct and that 'they' and not Trump can speak for magats on this issue has to establish that, in fact they do speak for magats and not Trump.

The below is so definitive and clear and simply ignoring it while trying to say 'but i am right' simply cannot fly.

429ca01818f2ac6465a9527828466213
 
Hey dumbfuck


What year was Epstein convicted?

Hey dumbfuck - why did Obama refuse to release the files under the Biden Junta?

Oh, that's right.

Bill Clinton
Prince Andrew
Bill Gates
Kevin Spacey
Robert DeNiro
Jeff Zuckerberg
Deepak Chopra
Woody Allen
Kathryn Ruemmler (Obama's Lawyer)
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson
 
Its TACO refusing to fund SNAP.

LOL

You lying terrorist fuck.

14 times the Americans have voted to open the government - 14 time the Hamas terrorist democrats blocked the bill that Ayatollah Schumer wrote and democrats passed 3 times in the past.

All because you terrorists are holding America hostage for a $1.5 trillion ransom.

democrats don't give a fuck if American children starve, they only serve the illegal aliens.
 
Better in terms of the actual users, a large percent Red State working poor, happier with what they get from it and fiercely opposed to it being cancelled.

Why would they be? Blue state welfare-for-life losers and career criminals benefited more from expanded Medicaid in far larger numbers while those actually having to PAY for a policy saw costs rise and their coverage go from decent to 'I got fucked.'
if it is so bad, why does it seem impossible for magats to replace it with something better thus getting a massive win from not just populist magats but populists across the spectrum?

Politics. It's that simple.
You would think if it was so terrible putting together a better offering would be very easy, right?

No. A government program, once started, is nearly impossible to kill off.

An entrenched position in warfare is difficult and costly to take. An entrenched position in a bureaucracy is virtually impossible to defeat.
 
I think their electing more Republicans and Trump tells you everything you need to know.

No, that's the Democrat(ic) party.
Um

The court records prove your an assbrain for claiming that


All the documented cases of election cheating is on the Republican side


Very little Democratic Party cheating has displayed its self in the fact record


Should I go get all those court records for you


They go all the way to the SCOTUS
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Why would they be? Blue state welfare-for-life losers and career criminals benefited more from expanded Medicaid in far larger numbers while those actually having to PAY for a policy saw costs rise and their coverage go from decent to 'I got fucked.'


Politics. It's that simple.


No. A government program, once started, is nearly impossible to kill off.

An entrenched position in warfare is difficult and costly to take. An entrenched position in a bureaucracy is virtually impossible to defeat.
Why end a program that helped fix an issue?

We have a democracy

The people approve is why you can’t kill Good programs
 
Why would they be?
You need to ask the Red State people who consistently state they like and want it and that Trump and co fear mightily whenever they think their voters are going to mess with it.

You telling them they do not value is meaningless when it is clear they do.


Blue state welfare-for-life losers and career criminals benefited more from expanded Medicaid in far larger numbers while those actually having to PAY for a policy saw costs rise and their coverage go from decent to 'I got fucked.'
Blue States also pay in the VAST VAST amount of money that pays for it BOTH in Red and Blue States. So the Blue States are just getting their money back mostly, and it Red states that are the welfare recipients.


Politics. It's that simple.
That does not answer the question. If the ObamaCare is so terrible then it must be easy to craft a better program. If it is not easy that means people cannot think of ways to improve it.

There is no politics, NONE, that would say to the Magat party to keep a more popular program they had in the wings secret for over a decade.

Let me rephrase as Magats and you are stupid so you might indeed think it is good politics to have a superior policy that you know voters would like more, a secret.

No. A government program, once started, is nearly impossible to kill off.


An entrenched position in warfare is difficult and costly to take. An entrenched position in a bureaucracy is virtually impossible to defeat.
Not if you are replacing it with a better one. NO one is going to complain about something that is better. What you are saying is true only if you kill it with no better option coming in.

But again, i must defer to my prior point. You magats are stupid so you might believe replacing Obamacare with something voters like more would be bad politics.
 
Back
Top