Jake Starkey
Verified User
I do hope you are well cared for, serenity.
I have taken care of my self comfortably compromising with humanity all the time. I cannot make ancestors change their social narratives, but I can show how their ancestry was corrupted by humanity same as mine and let them decide what tomorrow becomes every generation gap added midnight to noon being an artificial different day in a factual 7 day week logistics of past and future events every day forward, dawn to dusk.I do hope you are well cared for, serenity.
No it's not. It's a brilliant move - Comer wants to see how Clinton's testimony plays to make sure it won't do trump any more damage before he goes public.She wants to change the conditions for the deposition. That's, definitionally, moving the goal posts.
Yeah, which Republicans never do. You're such a dick.If it is a public deposition, you can take it to the bank that the Democrats on the committee will spend their time pontificating and bloviating rather than asking any meaningful questions. There will be lots of shouting and disruptions. There always are. If it was the other way around the same thing, maybe not quite as bad, but the same sort of thing, happening.
Yes, we get it, You hate Democrats. You're so boring with this bullshit, MEANWHILE WE ALL KNOW THAT NO ONE IS MORE FEARFUL ABOUT WHAT'S COMING OUT IN THE EPSTEIN FILES THAN TRUMP.The Clintons will dodge most of the questions with non-answers and drivel. That's pretty much standard for witnesses who are hostile to the whole hearing. In the end, it wouldn't change anything in particular. If there was anyone present I'd say doesn't care about the truth, it's the Hildabeast.
Perhaps - or perhaps instead of calling Clinton to testify THEY SHOULD CALL TRUMP BECAUSE HIS NAME HAS APPEARED OVER 38,000 TIMES IN THE DOCUMENTATION.A closed-door deposition avoids the worst of the public antics by either side as they gain nothing from them.
@T. A. Gardner knows that no one has more to fear than trump about what's in those files. Just calling the Clintons to testify in the first place is a stunt.T. A. is an idiot. He is worried about "public antics by either side...".
Open hearings will bet the best results for both sides.
Actually, it turns it into the public knowing what was asked...and answered.They want to turn it into a shit show and publicity stunt. Not being in front of the cameras deprives them of the chance to turn every question into a pissing contest of shouting and obfuscation.
ALLOW THE TESTIMONY TO BE DONE PUBLICLY OR DON'T ASK FOR THE TESTIMONY!She wants to change the conditions for the deposition. That's, definitionally, moving the goal posts. If it is a public deposition, you can take it to the bank that the Democrats on the committee will spend their time pontificating and bloviating rather than asking any meaningful questions. There will be lots of shouting and disruptions. There always are. If it was the other way around the same thing, maybe not quite as bad, but the same sort of thing, happening.
The Clintons will dodge most of the questions with non-answers and drivel. That's pretty much standard for witnesses who are hostile to the whole hearing. In the end, it wouldn't change anything in particular. If there was anyone present I'd say doesn't care about the truth, it's the Hildabeast.
A closed-door deposition avoids the worst of the public antics by either side as they gain nothing from them.