Two scientists discuss why they became atheist, or why they became Christian

Does it have to provide a "positive" alternative? Is NOT collecting stamps a "positive alternative" to collecting stamps?
it would be best.

you're just a nihilistic douche hole.
I believe I can agree with that. So long as no pejorative intent is included in the "reject religion" category. As we all know it is QUITE common in the religious circles to suggest that atheist are just "mad at God". I once heard someone who really hates atheism characterize it as people who didn't get a bike as a child for CHristmas and got mad at God. That was offensive in the extreme given that many of us have arrived at the atheist position from one of having reviewed our own faith and our own conceptions of what nature requires to explain it.



I doubt very highly that the "Golden Rule" was radical at any time really. I believe you and I both agreed that many of the moral actions are instinctual in may animals. But humans are simply more capable of examining alternatives and need to universalize the moral edicts we are probably born with in no small way.

I think what might be radical is the step we as humans add onto it: framing the inherent moral instincts in more universal terms and provide a way to require people to go with the moral instincts as opposed to the alternatives which we are (uniquely?) capable of generating in our large brains.

The radical bit is to say it out loud. Or to frame it in a way to is more expansive than just the moral instinct to help others of our kind.
you hate humanity and want to erode morality by eroding religion.

but the truth is that morality is rational.
 
Start your own religion forum. Otherwise, fuck off.

It was a joke. I was merely having fun. Please don't be offended.

You seem to not be having any real fun on JPP which I find sad. You have a lot to offer and you seem to know your stuff quite well.
 
Of course my view is right ! Because it's not my view,but was revealed to me!

And that is my point. You are sure your beliefs are without error. Science never makes that claim and for that I find it far more honest.

There are simply TOO MANY people who claim they KNOW THE TRUTH and that truth is often jarringly different from the TRUTH that another person claims to know as perfected truth.

The problem comes in being unable to verify which version of TRUTH is correct when their source is "revelation".
 
And that is my point. You are sure your beliefs are without error. Science never makes that claim and for that I find it far more honest.

There are simply TOO MANY people who claim they KNOW THE TRUTH and that truth is often jarringly different from the TRUTH that another person claims to know as perfected truth.

The problem comes in being unable to verify which version of TRUTH is correct when their source is "revelation".
Exactly! But " Many are called, few are Chosen "!
You no what the first thing I did when Chosen? I quit," get someone else "! YHWH doesn't take no for an answer!
Melchizedek-Files.com
 
And that is my point. You are sure your beliefs are without error. Science never makes that claim and for that I find it far more honest.

There are simply TOO MANY people who claim they KNOW THE TRUTH and that truth is often jarringly different from the TRUTH that another person claims to know as perfected truth.

The problem comes in being unable to verify which version of TRUTH is correct when their source is "revelation".
It's a Mission Impossible, but it doesn't matter, I was Chosen and I have to ride it out! In the end he'll say ,I sent Mason to warn you!
 
Happy Trails

I am sorely confused by that poster. They seem really knowledgeable about the topics but often seem so antagonistic to everyone. It's unfortunate because they seem to be really sharp and interesting.

Perhaps we on this forum are failing to meet their demanding standards and this is how they express their exasperation.
 
Really, who cares.
This thread currently has 110 responses, and most of my threads about atheism and religion generate scores or hundreds of responses.

My retort to your comment is that I must be fulfilling a niche and unmet need on this forum.
 
This thread currently has 110 responses, and most of my threads about atheism and religion generate scores or hundreds of responses.

My response to your comment is that I must be fulfilling a niche and unmet need on this forum.

I don't think the poster is in a mood to discuss things of late. They seem to be really touchy on just about every subject. Either way you actually DO fulfil a niche and unmet need on the forum. These threads are always the only place where it seems that actual conversation happens and not just political insults. But then it is called "Just politics" so I guess that explains some of it.

Keep it up!
 
This thread currently has 110 responses, and most of my threads about atheism and religion generate scores or hundreds of responses.

My retort to your comment is that I must be fulfilling a niche and unmet need on this forum.
Yes you do! And be warned ,I pray for you to get a "Huge" (in Trump's voice) dose of the Holy Spirit!
 
This thread currently has 110 responses, and most of my threads about atheism and religion generate scores or hundreds of responses.

My retort to your comment is that I must be fulfilling a niche and unmet need on this forum.
No, just a lot of uneducated people.
 
Back
Top