UK Met Office report: Global warming stopped 16 years ago

cancel2 2022

Canceled
This is not some right wing organisation funded by Big Oil or coal barons. This is a report from the UK Meteorological Office using the HADCRUT4 4.1.1. dataset.


  • The figures reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012 there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures
  • This means that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996
article-2217286-157E3ADF000005DC-561_644x358.jpg


The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago, according to new data released last week. The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures. This means that the ‘plateau’ or ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. Before that, temperatures had been stable or declining for about 40 years.

The new data, compiled from more than 3,000 measuring points on land and sea, was issued quietly on the internet, without any media fanfare, and, until today, it has not been reported. This stands in sharp contrast to the release of the previous figures six months ago, which went only to the end of 2010 – a very warm year. Ending the data then means it is possible to show a slight warming trend since 1997, but 2011 and the first eight months of 2012 were much cooler, and thus this trend is erased.

Some climate scientists, such as Professor Phil Jones, director of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, last week dismissed the significance of the plateau, saying that 15 or 16 years is too short a period from which to draw conclusions. Others disagreed. Professor Judith Curry, who is the head of the climate science department at America’s prestigious Georgia Tech university, told The Mail on Sunday that it was clear that the computer models used to predict future warming were ‘deeply flawed’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2217286/Global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago-reveals-Met-Office-report-quietly-released–chart-prove-it.html#ixzz29E78OR9H

hat tip to reader “Dino”

regarding the significance of the period from 1997, recall that Dr. Ben Santer claimed 17 years was the period needed:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/17/ben-santers-17-year-itch/

They find that tropospheric temperature records must be at least 17 years long to discriminate between internal climate noise and the signal of human-caused changes in the chemical composition of the atmosphere.

MIT Professor Richard Lindzen said something similar in a WUWT guest post:
There has been no warming since 1997 and no
statistically significant warming since 1995.

Bob Tisdale did a 17 and 30 year trend comparison here
Here’s the HADCRUT4 4.1.1. dataset



http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/10/13/report-global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago/
 
The Slimy Limey must think Americans give a shit about his tiny island, for some reason.

I guess it's a quaint tourist destination.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill

A
shill, plant, or stooge is a person who publicly helps a person or organization without disclosing that he has a close relationship with that person or organization. Shill typically refers to someone who purposely gives onlookers the impression that he is an enthusiastic independent customer of a seller (or marketer of ideas) for whom he is secretly working. The person or group who hires the shill is using [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowd_psychology"]crowd psychology, to encourage other onlookers or audience members to purchase the goods or services (or accept the ideas being marketed). Shills are often employed by professional marketing campaigns. [/URL]Plant and stooge more commonly refer to any person who is secretly in league with another person or organization while pretending to be neutral or actually a part of the organization he is planted in, such as a magician's audience, a political party, or an intelligence organization (see [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_agent"]double agent).[/URL][SUP][cita

[/SUP]
Shill can also be used pejoratively to describe a critic who appears either all-too-eager to heap glowing praise upon mediocre offerings, or who acts as an apologist for glaring flaws. In this sense, they would be an implicit shill for the industry at large, possibly because their income is tied to its prosperity. The origin of the term shill is uncertain; it may be an abbreviation of shillaber. The word originally denoted a carnival worker who pretended to be a member of the audience in an attempt to elicit interest in an attraction. Some sources trace the usage back to 1914.[SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][


[/SUP]
 
just have to read your post. You see unlike you I have very good reading comprehension

Apparently not, since it doesn't say a fucking word about "science" or "flat earth", which is what you claimed.

Another bounced check from the mouth of FactsRSuborned.

Keep 'em coming.
 
Where are all the amateur climatologists to refute the results?


First they will attack the UK.....then the Guardian.....then you, personally....

It will be entertaining....don't make any typos, they jump on that immediately...
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill

A
shill, plant, or stooge is a person who publicly helps a person or organization without disclosing that he has a close relationship with that person or organization. Shill typically refers to someone who purposely gives onlookers the impression that he is an enthusiastic independent customer of a seller (or marketer of ideas) for whom he is secretly working. The person or group who hires the shill is using crowd psychology, to encourage other onlookers or audience members to purchase the goods or services (or accept the ideas being marketed). Shills are often employed by professional marketing campaigns. Plant and stooge more commonly refer to any person who is secretly in league with another person or organization while pretending to be neutral or actually a part of the organization he is planted in, such as a magician's audience, a political party, or an intelligence organization (see double agent).[SUP][cita

[/SUP]
Shill can also be used pejoratively to describe a critic who appears either all-too-eager to heap glowing praise upon mediocre offerings, or who acts as an apologist for glaring flaws. In this sense, they would be an implicit shill for the industry at large, possibly because their income is tied to its prosperity. The origin of the term shill is uncertain; it may be an abbreviation of shillaber. The word originally denoted a carnival worker who pretended to be a member of the audience in an attempt to elicit interest in an attraction. Some sources trace the usage back to 1914.[SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][


[/SUP]

Very detailed and slightly interesting....

I assume you posted this to explain you continued support and devotion of Obama......you're a liberal shill.....a Democrat stooge......
 
Aoxomoxoa
user-offline.png
aka Tom Prendergast


Join DateApr 2009LocationEnglandPosts14,518Thanks1,823Thanked 2,367 Times in 1,794 PostsGroans492Groaned 433 Times in 396 Posts​


[h=2]
icon1.png
[/h]

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by bravo
First they will attack the UK.....then the Guardian.....then you, personally....

It will be entertaining....don't make any typos, they jump on that immediately...



The Met Office Hadley Centre was opened in 1990, by the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. What is supremely ironic is that she wanted a reason to justify nuclear power.

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate-...sources/hadley

I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask them where they're going, and hook up with them lat

Imagine that...Bravo and Tom. Politics truly does make strange bedfellows.

 
Very detailed and slightly interesting....

I assume you posted this to explain you continued support and devotion of Obama......you're a liberal shill.....a Democrat stooge......

Um, that would be no, my mentally challenged friend. I posted it to remind "Tom" that his shilling was very obvious in this thread.
 
Back
Top