Unconscious? You Know You Wanted It

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, I love that - yes, a rapist CAN be a rapist, but he isn't definitely a rapist unless a court says so.

Beyond moronic. You are seriously stupid; terminally....

see...you're lying about what i said...i said, under our laws he is not considered a rapist...eg., he doesn't have to register, he is not incarcerated...but...he can be a rapist

seriously, you and SF and darla have done nothing but lie and distort what i've said...its really weird and pathetic

No, you didn't say that. And you went on & on about it too - you're an idiot, who changes the goalposts every time he realizes his own idiocy.

Read back through the thread; you're really a fool. There was nothing about "under the law." It was all "he's not a rapist until a court tells us he is."'

I can't tell you how glad I am that I am nowhere near as clinically stupid as you.

bump :)
 

LOL - you actually have no idea how braindead you are.

Since I have to spell it out slowly for the braindead: you did not qualify "under the law" when this discussion started. That is one of the reasons this thread has gone on so long. I was incredulous that you said a rapist can't be a rapist until a court says so, and asked you to clarify about a dozen times.

Finally, when you realized how idiotic you were, you tried for the "under the law" thing, and even then, only allotted that he "can" be.

Get it yet? Probably not. You're a stupid, insane person. How in the world could you get that?
 
What is it with people writing stuff and then trying to deny they wrote it? Must be Yurt's unhealthy, psychotic influence.

Apple - above you are saying the "lack of emotion" is "probably" what caused them to dismiss the case.

That is patently ridiculous. Detectives would laugh at you.

this really says alot about you onceler and your two buddies SF and darla....

according to onceler, sf and darla....i'm all of these things:

psychotic, woman hater, apologists for rapists, lover of rapists, want to rape women, stupid, unethical, lunatic.....

i mean really...do you guys even realize how stupid you sound with your insults and smears....no one believes any of those things, except you three stooges
 
LOL - you actually have no idea how braindead you are.

Since I have to spell it out slowly for the braindead: you did not qualify "under the law" when this discussion started. That is one of the reasons this thread has gone on so long. I was incredulous that you said a rapist can't be a rapist until a court says so, and asked you to clarify about a dozen times.

Finally, when you realized how idiotic you were, you tried for the "under the law" thing, and even then, only allotted that he "can" be.

Get it yet? Probably not. You're a stupid, insane person. How in the world could you get that?

i was always talking about the law, always, your lies cannot change that

others accept this, but of course you can't

you can only "win" by lying and smearing onceler...lets see how many more times you can lie about what i've said
 
this really says alot about you onceler and your two buddies SF and darla....

according to onceler, sf and darla....i'm all of these things:

psychotic, woman hater, apologists for rapists, lover of rapists, want to rape women, stupid, unethical, lunatic.....

i mean really...do you guys even realize how stupid you sound with your insults and smears....no one believes any of those things, except you three stooges

They're not smears; you are legitimately stupid, and legitimately psychotic.

How many people have to say these things before you pause for a second and actually think there might be a little truth there? And you know it ain't just me, SF & Darla....
 
Yeah, I love that - yes, a rapist CAN be a rapist, but he isn't definitely a rapist unless a court says so.

Beyond moronic. You are seriously stupid; terminally....

see...you're lying about what i said...i said, under our laws he is not considered a rapist...eg., he doesn't have to register, he is not incarcerated...but...he can be a rapist

seriously, you and SF and darla have done nothing but lie and distort what i've said...its really weird and pathetic

No, you didn't say that. And you went on & on about it too - you're an idiot, who changes the goalposts every time he realizes his own idiocy.

Read back through the thread; you're really a fool. There was nothing about "under the law." It was all "he's not a rapist until a court tells us he is."'

I can't tell you how glad I am that I am nowhere near as clinically stupid as you.

it is really this simple:

onceler lies about what i said, gets called on it...then says...."no, you didn't say that".....but that is not a lie....

in onceler's world, you can lie, and its not a lie....but i'm a lunatic, lover of rapists, defender of rapists, woman hater.....so what do i know....:D
 
it is really this simple:

onceler lies about what i said, gets called on it...then says...."no, you didn't say that".....but that is not a lie....

in onceler's world, you can lie, and its not a lie....but i'm a lunatic, lover of rapists, defender of rapists, woman hater.....so what do i know....:D

Who are you talking to? The 2-3 posters who don't think you're a pathological liar & psychotic?
 
They're not smears; you are legitimately stupid, and legitimately psychotic.

How many people have to say these things before you pause for a second and actually think there might be a little truth there? And you know it ain't just me, SF & Darla....

um....yes....it is just you, sf and darla....sf has tried to use Soc to bolster his claims, yet everytime he does so wrongly and soc certaintly has supported your gangs claim...no one has....you three are on an island on this one....but i seem to recall you or one of your gang claimed the "whole" board thinks i'm stupid and wrong....lmao...

and LOL...i'm now not just simply stupid and psychotic....but i'm finally "legitimately" stupid and psychotic....

:lmao:
 
um....yes....it is just you, sf and darla....sf has tried to use Soc to bolster his claims, yet everytime he does so wrongly and soc certaintly has supported your gangs claim...no one has....you three are on an island on this one....but i seem to recall you or one of your gang claimed the "whole" board thinks i'm stupid and wrong....lmao...

and LOL...i'm now not just simply stupid and psychotic....but i'm finally "legitimately" stupid and psychotic....

:lmao:

Actually, you're right. In Yurt-world, you only CAN be legitimately stupid & psychotic, and it's only my opinion that you are. At least, until a court determines that you are for sure.

Good call.
 
Yeah, I love that - yes, a rapist CAN be a rapist, but he isn't definitely a rapist unless a court says so.

Beyond moronic. You are seriously stupid; terminally....

see...you're lying about what i said...i said, under our laws he is not considered a rapist...eg., he doesn't have to register, he is not incarcerated...but...he can be a rapist

seriously, you and SF and darla have done nothing but lie and distort what i've said...its really weird and pathetic

No, you didn't say that. And you went on & on about it too - you're an idiot, who changes the goalposts every time he realizes his own idiocy.

Read back through the thread; you're really a fool. There was nothing about "under the law." It was all "he's not a rapist until a court tells us he is."'

I can't tell you how glad I am that I am nowhere near as clinically stupid as you.

:lol:
 
well....since you replied...dumbass

and onceler....its only you three who believe the way you do....nice dodge on defending your lie btw....

LOL

You keep posting those quotes like you caught me in some "lie"; it's bizarre. You really do have intense reading comprehension problems (and you know this ain't the first time).

Read through that whole quote, Yurt; my point was that your initial position was not strictly about "under the law."

I shouldn't have to explain that again. Why do you have to be so insufferably obtuse?
 
Just to bail you out - my "no, you didn't say that," was in reference to you setting the distinction of "under the law." That was made abundantly clear if you read the rest of the post, but when you're looking for the quick "gotcha", you miss stuff like that....
 
Just to bail you out - my "no, you didn't say that," was in reference to you setting the distinction of "under the law." That was made abundantly clear if you read the rest of the post, but when you're looking for the quick "gotcha", you miss stuff like that....

that is a lie....and the posts show that

too bad for you...nice try at recovery though....c- effort
 
Yeah, I love that - yes, a rapist CAN be a rapist, but he isn't definitely a rapist unless a court says so.

Beyond moronic. You are seriously stupid; terminally....

see...you're lying about what i said...i said, under our laws he is not considered a rapist...eg., he doesn't have to register, he is not incarcerated...but...he can be a rapist

seriously, you and SF and darla have done nothing but lie and distort what i've said...its really weird and pathetic

No, you didn't say that. And you went on & on about it too - you're an idiot, who changes the goalposts every time he realizes his own idiocy.

Read back through the thread; you're really a fool. There was nothing about "under the law." It was all "he's not a rapist until a court tells us he is."'

I can't tell you how glad I am that I am nowhere near as clinically stupid as you.

:)
 
Yep - figured.

See response on other thread, and cackle away.

"Can't talk to a psycho like a normal human being" - Poe....
 
No, detectives would not laugh.

It is not the lack of emotion per-se. As I tried to make clear the person's demeanor is analyzed by any detective who interrogates. That's why 911 calls play a big part in cases. A person's emotional reaction is a clue.

I interpret the transcript as possibly lacking the normal emotion associated with rape. I think it's apparent the detective and the Attorney General felt the same way as a confession is usually a slam dunk case.

Look at the facts. The guy is running for the Senate. Winning ANY case is a plus for him and he has a confession! It's a cake walk IF the confession is real but he knows it just doesn't sound right.

On that note I'm going to bed. I'm not a religious man but I do intend to say a quick "Thank God" it's not with someone like Darla! :eek3:

What an illiterate ignoramus. You have just announced, with this post, that you either did not read the article or any of the posts on this thread except the one which triggered your role-playing sexual stupor, or, you read them and you have the reading comprehension of a dim-witted first grader.

You have made up all of your "facts".

"It's a cake walk IF the confession is real but he knows it just doesn't sound right".

That's pulled straight out of your ass.

In fact, The Colorado Independent explained, in an article I linked to, that: "In establishing whether there were grounds to arrest the suspect, Greeley police had the victim phone the suspect from the police station. That call was recorded and entered into evidence. The recording was made without his knowledge, so it can't be used in court."

The tape was not admissable. That's what's known as a technicality. Surely someone as educated by what occurs on television procedurals as you are, would know that evidence that is deemed not admissable on a legal technicality is not something "that just doesn't sound right".

You fucking idiot.

You dare to come on this thread and post things you invented in your zeal to jerk off on a message board and apologize for a rapist.

Further, your invented belief that the police didn't believe her, is contradicted by this:

"The report, however, suggests that the police did recommend charges. “I advised (the suspect) that I would be requesting a felony summons for sexual assault,” Detective Michael Zeller wrote in the report. "

Once Buck's refusal to prosecute became a political issue, the police of chief denied that this was true, though on what grounds since the newspaper has the actual written report, I would be hard pressed to state. It's obvious that this has become a political hot potato.

But that's what the detective wrote in the report. Which you would have known if you had bothered to read anything on this thread before you began masturbating like the deranged monkey you are.

Try and get your facts straight idiot. This is not about what you think, what it sounds like to you, or most absurdly, what it "smells like" to you.

Read before commenting you incredible moron.
 
that is a lie....and the posts show that

too bad for you...nice try at recovery though....c- effort

Oh - missed this. I thought so.

You did get it wrong, and yes, the posts DO show that you got it wrong. And you've re-posted them so many times....ouch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top