"Lockdown protests" gets a few more results:
https://www.npr.org/2021/03/21/9796...ope-clash-with-police-over-covid-19-lockdowns
https://nypost.com/2021/03/20/france-adds-covid-19-restrictions-as-europeans-protest-rules/
https://www.foxnews.com/world/anti-lockdown-londoners-attack-police-in-mass-protest
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-germany-protest-idUSKBN2BC0NL
https://www.france24.com/en/europe/...-as-tempers-fray-over-tightening-restrictions
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...lice-criminalise-protesters-say-mps-and-peers
https://www.kob.com/albuquerque-new...old-anti-lockdown-anti-mask-protest-/6048793/
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rules-florida-widens-eligibility-virus-update
Not a lot of mainstream coverage, and what there is seems critical of the protesters.
Leprosy, could it be that this is not an earth-shattering event???????????????????
Could it?
Leprosy, I guess you need something to keep your spirit up, regardless how miniscule.
I saw the story on lib news, BBC and Newsy.
it starts with warnings and ends up with onerous regulations -why we are inherently resistant to "warnings"Probably not, people do that anywhere anytime, wasn’t that long ago when some said warnings on cigarette packages deprived them of their freedom to choose, same with seat belts, and I even recall Stop signs, always going be self centered people who see everything first person singular in every language
it starts with warnings and ends up with onerous regulations -why we are inherently resistant to "warnings"
I'm not interested in seeing a list of your personal accomplishments. Thanks anyway.
it starts with warnings and ends up with onerous regulations -why we are inherently resistant to "warnings"