US Debt Crosses 100% of GDP for First Time Since 1946—And This Time Is Different

T. A. Gardner said:
More than 50% of the federal budget today is on social-welfare spending that is locked in. That is, it can't be altered to reduce it nor can it be ended.

Tax cuts or hikes have little impact on the federal budget compared to profligate spending on welfare.
Click to expand...

“Tax cuts or hikes have little impact compared to welfare spending”​


This is flatly misleading.


✔️ Reality: Both sides matter​


The deficit is driven by two sides of the ledger:


  • Spending
  • Revenue (taxes)

Even small % changes in either can mean trillions over time.



3) Impact of Trump tax cuts (first term + extensions)​


Key facts​


  • The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) significantly reduced federal revenue.
  • Extending those cuts (a major policy goal) is projected to:
    • Add trillions to the deficit over time.

Examples:


  • CBO-type projections:
    • ~$4–5 trillion added to deficits over a decade from extending tax cuts
  • Other analyses:
    • ~$3.8 trillion revenue loss from extensions

And importantly:


  • Tax cuts directly increase deficits if not offset


4) Relative scale: spending vs tax policy​


Here’s the key misunderstanding in the original claim:


Spending side​


  • Mandatory spending ≈ 60% of budget

Revenue side​


  • Total revenue ≈ $4.9 trillion/year

👉 If you cut taxes by even ~10–15%:


  • That’s hundreds of billions per year
  • Which compounds to trillions over a decade

So:


  • Tax policy changes are absolutely large enough to materially affect debt


5) The real picture economists agree on​


The U.S. debt problem is driven by both:


Structural spending growth​


  • Aging population → Social Security + Medicare rising
  • Healthcare costs

Structural revenue choices​


  • Tax cuts (especially if not offset)
  • Tax base erosion

👉 Most serious analyses conclude:


  • You cannot stabilize debt without addressing BOTH spending and revenue


6) Clean verdict on the original statement​


Claim:​


“More than 50% is social welfare and can’t be changed”
Click to expand...

  • Half true / half false
    • ✔️ Large share
    • ❌ Not unchangeable

Claim:​


“Tax cuts or hikes have little impact”
Click to expand...

  • False
    • Tax policy changes have multi-trillion-dollar impacts
    • Trump-era tax cuts are a major contributor to projected deficits


7) The blunt reality​


If you strip away ideology:


  • You could eliminate all non-defense discretionary spending and still not balance the budget
  • You could raise taxes modestly and significantly reduce deficits
  • You could reform entitlements and significantly reduce deficits

👉 The math forces this conclusion:


The debt problem is too big to solve with only one lever.
 
QP! said:
Not really a partisan issue as both parties have piled in debts. Republicans tend to be the one who shout about debt being bad while adding the most to it, so that is an issue.

The biggest issue i see currently will be met as a partisan issue but i am not pushing it for that reason, but it is Trump pushing much of the world away from holding the US dollar and debt and them moving to other currencies and debt. that will end up repricing all US debt and making it more expensive which is worse than the impact of simply adding more debt.

US Debt Crosses 100% of GDP for First Time Since 1946—And This Time Is Different​


US public debt has reached 100 percent of GDP (gross domestic product) for the first time since the aftermath of World War II. Just because we have been here before, and we managed, doesn’t mean we will do so again. This time is different in important ways that are underappreciated by both policymakers and the public.

In 1946, the United States emerged from a global war with high debt, but also with a young population, strong growth prospects, and a political commitment to fiscal restraint. Today, America faces the opposite: an aging population, structurally rising entitlement spending, and persistent deficits with no credible plan to rein them in....

image-2.png


Do Debt Thresholds Matter?​

Economists have long debated whether there is a specific tipping point at which public debt begins to harm economic growth. While estimates vary, a broad body of research suggests that the risks become more pronounced as debt rises beyond roughly 80 percent of GDP for advanced economies. Sustained debt levels above this range are associated with slower economic growth, reduced investment, and diminished fiscal flexibility.

The United States has now moved well beyond the range where research suggests debt begins to weigh on growth. High debt levels gradually erode economic performance through crowding out private investment, increasing borrowing costs, and limiting the government’s ability to respond to future crises.

The United States is also different from other advanced economies due to the unique role that the US dollar plays in global financial markets. As the issuer of the world’s dominant reserve currency and a primary supplier of safe assets, the US benefits from what economists call an “exorbitant privilege.” This enables the US government to sustain higher debt levels than other countries.

Even this privilege is not without limits, however. Estimates suggest that the dollar’s status may expand the US government’s debt capacity by roughly 20 percent of GDP, putting the US threshold where debt begins to weigh on growth closer to 100 percent of GDP than 80.

And “exorbitant privilege” is not a permanent entitlement, either. It depends on investor confidence, the depth and liquidity of US financial markets, and the absence of credible alternatives to US dollar dominance. Should that confidence weaken, because of political dysfunction, fiscal irresponsibility, and the rise of competing safe assets, the US advantage could erode.



--------------------------


The real trouble with the US debt topping 100 percent of GDP​

Click to expand...
Trump has added over 10.5 Trillion to the debt in just over 5 years.
And it has been the Republicans that have run us into Recessions/ depressions 11 out of the last 12 Recessions started under Republican Presidents.
Reagan almost tripled the debt , Bush doubled the debt and ran us into a deep recession almost Depression and Obama got us out of it . Yes he added about 8 Trillion to the debt doing it , and it took him 8 years , now Trump took over an economy that was doing very well and ran that into the ground adding almost 8 Trillion to the debt and did it all in just 4 years.
Yep Republicans sure know how to fuck up our economy that is for sure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top